Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Taylor, C. S.
and
Murray, J. I.
1987.
Voluntary food intake of cattle differing in breed size in a time-controlled feeding system.
Animal Science,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 3,
p.
433.
Loewer, O.J.
Taul, K.L.
Turner, L.W.
Gay, N.
and
Muntifering, R.
1987.
Graze: A model of selective grazing by beef animals.
Agricultural Systems,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 4,
p.
297.
Illius, A. W.
1989.
Allometry of food intake and grazing behaviour with body size in cattle.
The Journal of Agricultural Science,
Vol. 113,
Issue. 2,
p.
259.
Groen, A.F
and
Korver, S
1989.
The economic value of feed intake capacity of dairy cows.
Livestock Production Science,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
269.
Rook, A. J.
Dhanoa, M. S.
and
Gill, M.
1990.
Prediction of the voluntary intake of grass silages by beef cattle 3. Precision of alternative prediction models.
Animal Science,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 3,
p.
455.
Rook, A. J.
and
Gill, M.
1990.
Prediction of the voluntary intake of grass silages by beef cattle. 1. Linear regression analyses.
Animal Science,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 3,
p.
425.
OLDHAM, J.D.
SIMM, G.
and
MARSDEN, S.
1992.
Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition.
p.
73.
Ingvartsen, K.Lønne
1994.
Models of voluntary food intake in cattle.
Livestock Production Science,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 1,
p.
19.
Mackle, T. R.
Parr, C. R.
Stakelum, G. K.
Bryant, A. M.
and
MacMillan, K. L.
1996.
Feed conversion efficiency, daily pasture intake, and milk production of primiparous Friesian and Jersey cows calved at two different liveweights.
New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 3,
p.
357.
Ingrand, S.
and
Agabriel, J.
1997.
Typology of the evolution of intake by Charolais cows around calving.
Animal Science,
Vol. 65,
Issue. 3,
p.
361.
Nielsen, H.M.
Friggens, N.C.
Løvendahl, P.
Jensen, J.
and
Ingvartsen, K.L.
2003.
Influence of breed, parity, and stage of lactation on lactational performance and relationship between body fatness and live weight.
Livestock Production Science,
Vol. 79,
Issue. 2-3,
p.
119.
Casasús, I.
Sanz, A.
Villalba, D.
Ferrer, R.
and
Revilla, R.
2004.
Intake capacity of two breeds of suckler cattle of different milk yield potential and validation of prediction models.
Livestock Production Science,
Vol. 89,
Issue. 2-3,
p.
195.
Pearson, R. A.
Archibald, R. F.
and
Muirhead, R. H.
2006.
A comparison of the effect of forage type and level of feeding on the digestibility and gastrointestinal mean retention time of dry forages given to cattle, sheep, ponies and donkeys.
British Journal of Nutrition,
Vol. 95,
Issue. 1,
p.
88.
Whetsell, M. S.
Rayburn, E. B.
and
Osborne, P. I.
2006.
Evaluation in Appalachian pasture systems of the 1996 (update 2000) National Research Council model for weaning cattle1,2.
Journal of Animal Science,
Vol. 84,
Issue. 5,
p.
1265.
Hall, S.J.G.
Lenstra, J.A.
and
Deeming, D.C.
2012.
Prioritization based on neutral genetic diversity may fail to conserve important characteristics in cattle breeds.
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics,
Vol. 129,
Issue. 3,
p.
218.
Huuskonen, Arto
Huhtanen, Pekka
and
Joki-Tokola, Erkki
2013.
The development of a model to predict feed intake by growing cattle.
Livestock Science,
Vol. 158,
Issue. 1-3,
p.
74.
Holmøy, Ingrid H.
Nelson, Sindre T.
Martin, Adam D.
and
Nødtvedt, Ane
2017.
Factors associated with the number of calves born to Norwegian beef suckler cows.
Preventive Veterinary Medicine,
Vol. 140,
Issue. ,
p.
1.
Jardstedt, Mikaela
Hessle, Anna
Nørgaard, Peder
Frendberg, Linn
and
Nadeau, Elisabet
2018.
Intake and feed utilization in two breeds of pregnant beef cows fed forages with high-fiber concentrations1.
Journal of Animal Science,
Vol. 96,
Issue. 8,
p.
3398.
2022.
2022.