Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:27:10.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vehicle motion and motion sickness in pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. M. Randall  and
R. H. Bradshaw
J. M. Randall
Affiliation:
Silsoe Research Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4HS
R. H. Bradshaw
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ES
Get access

Abstract

Low frequency oscillatory motion (0·05 to 0·5 Hz) experienced in ships and road vehicles is known to cause motion sickness in humans and some predictive models are available. There have been very few studies of the incidence of motion sickness in pigs and none which has attempted to identify the frequencies of motion of transporters which are likely to be implicated. In this study, the vibration and motion characteristics of a commercial pig transporter were measured while seven individually penned 40-kg pigs were transported for short (100 min) journeys and 80-kg pigs penned in groups of 12 or 13 were transported for longer (4·5 h) journeys. Direct behavioural observations were made of individual pigs for symptoms of travel sickness (sniffing, foaming at the mouth, chomping, and retching or vomiting). A comparison was then made between the incidence of travel sickness in pigs and that expected in humans given the measured vehicle vibration characteristics. The low frequencies of motion measured on the transporter (0·01 to 0·2 Hz) were well within the range implicated in human motion sickness with considerable power in the longitudinal and lateral axes but little in the vertical axis. On both short and long journeys pigs exhibited symptoms of travel sickness. The likely incidence of travel sickness on the short journeys predicted by the human model was 24 to 31% which corresponds to approximately two of the seven 40-kg pigs becoming travel sick. The numbers observed were generally lower than this although the same pigs were transported twice each day for 2 days and this may have therefore reflected the effects of habituation. The incidence of travel sickness on the long journeys predicted by the human model was 34%. During these journeys which involved four groups of 80-kg pigs which were not repeatedly transported, 26% of pigs vomited or retched (13 out of 50) while 50% showed advanced symptoms of foaming and chomping. These results are not inconsistent with the human model which should form the basis offurther research.

Keywords

motion sicknessnauseapigstransport
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 239 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradshaw, R. H. and Hall, S. J. G. 1996. Incidence of travel sickness in pigs. Veterinary Record 139: 503.Google ScholarPubMed
Bradshaw, R. H., Hall, S. J. G. and Broom, D. M. 1996a. Behavioural and cortisol response of pigs and sheep during transport. Veterinary Record 138: 233–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradshaw, R. H., Parrott, R. F., Forsling, M. L., Goode, J. A., Lloyd, D. M., Rodway, R. G. and Broom, D. M. 1996b. Stress and travel sickness in pigs: effects of road transport on plasma concentrations of cortisol, beta-endorphin and lysine vasopressin. Animal Science 63: 507–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, R. H., Parrott, R. F., Goode, J. A., Lloyd, D. M., Rodway, R. G. and Broom, D. M. 1996c. Behavioural and hormonal responses of pigs during transport: effect of mixing and duration of journey. Animal Science 62: 547–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, R. H., Randall, J. M., Stiles, M. A., Brown, S. N., Forsling, M. L., Rodway, R., Goode, J. A., Warriss, P. D. and Broom, D. M. 1997. Effects of travel sickness on stress hormones and meat quality in pigs. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 1997, p. 103.Google Scholar
British Standards Institution. 1987. Measurement and evaluation of human exposure to whole-body mechanical vibration and repeated shock. BS 6841. British Standards Institution, London.Google Scholar
Forsling, M. L., Sharman, D. F. and Stephens, D. B. 1984. Vasopressin in the blood plasma of pigs and calves exposed t o noise and vibration comparable with that experienced during transport. Journal of Physiology 357: 96P.Google Scholar
Fox, R. A., Keil, L. C., Daunton, N. G., Crampton, G. H. and Lucot, J. 1987. Vasopressin and motion sickness in cats. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 58: A143–A147.Google ScholarPubMed
Golding, J. F. and Markey, H. M. 1996. Effect of frequency of horizontal linear oscillation on motion sickness and somatogravic illusion Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 67: 121–126.Google ScholarPubMed
Golding, J. F., Markey, H. M. and Stott, J. R. R. 1995. The effects of motion direction, body axis, and posture on motion sickness induced by low frequency linear oscillation. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 66: 1046–1051.Google ScholarPubMed
Griffin, M. J. 1990. Handbook of human vibration. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Lawther, A. and Griffin, M. J. 1986. The motion of a ship at sea and the consequent motion sickness amongst passengers Ergonomics 29: 535–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perremans, S., Randall, J. M., Allegaert, L., Stiles, M. A., Rombouts, G. and Geers, R. 1998. Influence of vertical vibration on the heart rate of pigs. Journal of Animal Science In press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riches, H., Guise, J. and Penny, R. 1996. Preliminary investigation of frequency of vomiting by pigs in transport. Veterinary Record 139: 428.Google ScholarPubMed
Stephens, D. B. and Perry, G. C. 1990. The effects of restraint, handling, simulated and real transport in the pig (with reference to man and other species) Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. 1992. A description of low frequency motion in road coaches. Proceedings of the United Kingdom meeting human response to vibration, 28 to 30 September, I.S.V.R University of Southampton, Southampton, pp. 323–339.Google Scholar
Turner, M. 1994. Driven to sickness? The effect of individual driving style on motion sickness occurrence. Proceedings of the United Kingdom meeting on human to vibration, 19 to 21 September, Institute of Naval Medicine, Alverstoke, Hampshire, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Vogel, H., Kohlhaas, R. and Baumgarten, R. J. von. 1982. Dependence of motion sickness in automobiles on the direction of linear acceleration European Journal of Applied Physiology 48: 399–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed