Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:23:05.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in ovulation rate and litter size of Cambridge sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. Ap Dewi ,
J. B. Owen ,
A. El-Sheikh ,
R. F. E. Axford  and
M. Beigi-Nassiri
I. Ap Dewi
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW
J. B. Owen
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW
A. El-Sheikh
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW
R. F. E. Axford
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW
M. Beigi-Nassiri
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW
Get access

Abstract

Ovulation rate (OR) and litter size (LS) were recorded in a flock of Cambridge sheep from 1984 to 1994 and from 1976 to 1994 respectively. There were 1516 and 2480 OR and LS records with means of 3·2 and 2·5 respectively. There was considerable variation in results between years ranging from 2·2 to 3·2 for LS and from 2·8 to 4·2 for OR. Ewe lamb OR was affected by year of recording, some years having higher OR than others. Rearing type (single, twin or triplet) also affected ewe lamb OR, twins having lower OR than both singles and triplets. Ewe lamb OR decreased with later date of birth reflecting a lower age at OR counting. Ewe lamb LS was affected by year of recording and there was also an interaction between date of birth and year indicating that OR decreased with later date of birth in some years but not in others. OR of adult ewes was affected by year of recording which also interacted with age (2, 3 and 4). Generally, OR increased with age but this trend was not observed in all years. LS of adult ewes was significantly affected by year and increased with ewe age (2, 3 and 4). Heritability and repeatability were determined for ewe lamb OR and LS and adult ewe OR and LS in univariate and two-trait analyses using DFREML. Heritabilities of ewe lamb OR (0·18 to 0·21) and LS (0·05 to 0·08) were lower than corresponding adult ewe values for OR (0·19 to 0·34) and LS (0·19 to 0·22). Ewe OR had a lower repeatability (0·43 to 0·55) than LS (0·30 to 0·80). High genetic correlations (>0·9) were obtained for combinations of ewe lamb OR, ewe lamb LS, adult ewe OR and adult ewe LS. The importance of analysing ewe lamb and ewe records separately is discussed as is the value of ewe lamb OR as a selection criterion.

Keywords

genetic parameterslitter sizeovulation rateprolificacy
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , June 1996 , pp. 489 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ap Dewi, I., Owen, J. B., Axford, J. P. and Hanrahan, J. P. 1995. Variation in progeny performance of prolific ewes of extreme phenotype. Animal Science 60:522(abstr.).Google Scholar
Boujenane, I., Bradford, G. E., Berger, Y. M. and Lahlou Kassi, A. 1991. Repeatability estimates for litter size and its components in sheep. Animal Reproduction Science 26:107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, G. E., Inounu, I., Iniguez, L. C., Tiesnamurti, B. and Thomas, D. L. 1991. The prolificacy gene of Javanese sheep. In Major genes for reproduction in sheep (ed. Elsen, J. M., Bodin, L. and Thimonier, J.), 2nd international workshop, Toulouse, 07 16–18, 1990, pp. 67-73. INRA, Paris.Google Scholar
Bunge, R., Thomas, D. L. and Nash, T. G. 1993. Performance of hair breeds and prolific wool breeds of sheep in southern Illinois: lamb production of F1 ewe lambs. Journal of Animal Science 71:2012–2017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castonguay, F., Minvielle, F. and Dufour, J. J. 1990. Reproductive performance of Booroola × Finnish Landrace and Booroola × Suffolk ewe lambs, heterozygous for the F gene, and growth traits of their three-way cross lambs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 70:55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. and Maxwell, W. M. C. 1987. Salamon's artificial insemination of sheep and goats. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Eythorsdottir, E., Adalsteinsson, S., Jonmundson, J. V. and Hanrahan, J. P. 1991. Research work on the Icelandic Thoka gene;. In Major genes for reproduction in sheep (ed. Elsen, J. M., Bodin, L. and Thimonier, J.), 2nd international workshop, Toulouse, 07 16–18, 1990, pp. 75-84. INRA, Paris.Google Scholar
Fahmy, M. 1989. Repeatabilit y of ovulation rate, number of lambs born and ova loss in sheep with different ovulation rates. Canadian journal of Animal Science 69:307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahmy, M. 1990. Follicle number and uterine measurements in crossbred Finnish Landrace and other ewe lambs, fed at a high or low level and slaughtered at different ages and weights. Bulletin of the research branch of Agriculture Canada 13:25–28.Google Scholar
Fahmy, M. 1992. Effect of diet on ovarian and uterine measurements of ewe lambs with or without Finnsheep breeding. Small Ruminant Research 7:271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanrahan, J. P. 1987. Genetic variation in ovulation rate in sheep. In New techniques in sheep production (ed. Marai, I. F. M., and Owen, J. B.), pp. 37–46. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanrahan, J. P. and Owen, J. B. 1985. Variation and repeatability of ovulation rate in Cambridge ewes. Animal Production 40:529.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1990. User's guide for LSMLMW and MIXMDL PC-2 version.Google Scholar
Kleemann, D. O., Walker, S. K., Walkley, J. R. W., Ponzoni, R. W., Smith, D. H., Grimson, R. J. and Seamark, R. F. 1991. Effect of pre-mating nutrition on reproductive performance of Booroola Merino × South Australian Merino ewes. Animal Reproduction Science 26:269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamberson, W. R. and Thomas, D. L. 1982. Effects of season and breed of sire on incidence of estrus and ovulation rate in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 54:533–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leymaster, W. R. and Bennett, G. L. 1990. Models of litter size and their consequences. Proceedings of the fourth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Edinburgh. 16:299–308.Google Scholar
McNatty, K. P., Henderson, K. M., Fleming, J. S., Price, C. A. and Clarke, I. J. 1990. How does the F gene influence ovulation rates in Booroola ewes? A 1990 perspective. Proceedings of tlie New Zealand Society of Animal Production 50:135–140.Google Scholar
Meyer, H. H. and Piper, L. R. 1992. Embryo survival relative to ovulation rate in Booroola and control Merinos and crosses with medium wool breeds. Proceedings of the Western Section of the American Society of Animal Science 43:103–105.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. 1993. DFREML Version 2.1 — programs to estimate variance components by restricted maximum likelihood using a derivative-free algorithm. User notes. Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.Google Scholar
Morris, C. A. 1990. Theoretical and realised responses to selection for reproductive rate. Proceedings of the fourth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Edinburgh 16:309–318.Google Scholar
Nawaz, M. and Meyer, H. H. 1991. Effects of genotype and mating weight on ovulation rate, litter size, and uterine efficiency of Coopworth, Polypay, and crossbred ewes. journal of Animal Science 69:3925–3930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, J. B. and Ap Dewl, I. 1988. The Cambridge sheep — its exploitation for increased efficiency of lamb production. journal of Agricultural Science in Finland 60:585–590.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B., Whitaker, C. J., Axford, R. F. E. and Ap Dewi, I. 1990. Expected consequences of the segregation of a major gene in a sheep population in relation to observations on a flock of Cambridge sheep. Animal Production 51:277–282.Google Scholar
Ricordeau, G., Thimonier, J., Poivey, J. P., Driancourt, M. A., Hochereau de Reviers, M. T. and Tchamitchian, L. 1990. I.N.R.A. research on the Romanov sheep breed in France: a review. Livestock Production Science 24:305–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez Iglesias, R. M., Irazoqui, H., Ciccioli, N. H. and Giglioli, C. 1993. Seasonality of oestrus and ovulation in Corriedale ewes: repeatabilities and phenotypic correlations, journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 120:115–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez Iglesias, R. M., Miquel, M. C., Vulich, S. A. and Murtagh, J. J. 1992. Heritability of ovulation rate and litter size at birth in Corriedale ewes. Revista Argentina de Production Animal 12:169–175.Google Scholar
Schoenian, S. G. and Burfening, P. J. 1990. Ovulation rate, lambing rate, litter size and embryo survival of Rambouillet sheep selected for high and low reproductive rate. Journal of Animal Science 68:2263–2270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C. and McMillan, I. 1989. Use of identified genes in animal breeding. In Evolution and animal breeding (ed. Hill, W. G. and MacKay, F. C.), pp. 237–241. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Smith, J. F. 1989. Principles of reproduction. In Sheep production: volume 1. Breeding and reproduction (ed. Wickham, G. A. and McDonald, M. F.), pp. 211–237. New Zealand Institute of Agricultural Science.Google Scholar
Waldron, D. F. and Thomas, D. L. 1992. Increased litter size in Rambouillet sheep: I. Estimation of genetic parameters. Journal of Animal Science 70:3333–3344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiener, G., Lee, G. J. and Woolliams, J. A. 1992. Effects of rapid inbreeding and of crossing inbred lines on conception rate, prolificacy and ewe survival in sheep. Animal Production 55:115–121.Google Scholar
Young, L. D. and Dickerson, G. E. 1991. Comparison of Booroola Merino and Finnsheep: effects on productivity of mates and performance of crossbred lambs. Journal of Animal Science 69:1899–1911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed