Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:46:27.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation during growth of twin cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. S. Taylor  and
Jean Craig
C. S. Taylor
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh 9
Jean Craig
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh 9
Get access

Extract

Phenotypic variances within pairs of monozygotic and dizygotic twin heifers and also genetic variances and heritabilities were calculated for 12 linear body measurements at a sequence of eight ages up to two years old. The 60 pairs of fraternal and 60 pairs of identical twins used were reared as part of a larger uniformity trial in which feeding was effectively ad libitum throughout.

Size differences between members of DZ twin pairs were found to be approximately normally distributed with about the same variance for all breeds and crosses. The variance within DZ pairs increased strongly with age, with a marked increase between 9 and 12 months of age and with most body measurements showing a broadly similar trend. On a logarithmic scale DZ variances increased roughly linearly with degree of maturity and at about the same rate in each body measurement. Coefficients of variation within DZ pairs corrected for measuring error had an average value of 2%. They did not change greatly with age, and were roughly the same for most body measurements although width measurements tended to be more variable than average.

Coefficients of variation within MZ pairs had a corresponding overall average of 1·4%; they declined rapidly with age from 2·0% to 1·1%, were roughly the same for all body measurements, but at early ages tended to be greater in late than in early maturing body parts. However, they showed no association with the earliness of maturing of a body part provided variation was measured at the same degree of maturity for each body part.

Genetic variation increased rapidly with age in all body measurements. The rate of increase with age was greater for late than for early maturing parts. The rate of increase with degree of maturity, however, was about the same for all body measurements. Coefficients of genetic variation increased slowly with age; they had an average value of 1·6%.

Estimates of heritability are given at a sequence of eight ages for each of 12 body measurements. They increased strongly with age from 0·14 on average at three months of age to 0·67 on average at two years of age. At any fixed age, early maturing body parts tended to have higher heritabilities than later maturing body parts. However, if heritability was measured at the same degree of maturity in each body part, early and late maturing parts had about equal heritabilities.

The present results are compared with those obtained from twin cattle studies in New Zealand, Sweden and Wisconsin, U.S.A.

Inferences from twins about genetic variances and heritabilities for unrelated animals are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , February 1967 , pp. 35 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bartlett, M. S., 1937. Cited in Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, 1954. Vol. 1, p. 57. Ed. E. S. Pearson and H. O. Hartley. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blackmore, D. W., McGilliard, L. D., & Lush, J. L., 1958. Genetic relations between body measurements at three ages in Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci., 41: 1045–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C. J., 1958. Heritability of weight and certain body dimensions of beef calves at weaning. Arkansas Ag. Exp. Sta. Bull., no. 597.Google Scholar
Brown, C. J., & Franks, L., 1964. Factors affecting size of young beef cows. J. Anim. Sci., 23: 665–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumby, P. J., & Hancock, J., 1956. A preliminary report of growth and milk production in identical—and fraternal—twin dairy cattle. N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. Agric, 38: 184–193.Google Scholar
Christian, L. L., Hauser, E. R., & Chapman, A. B., 1965. Heritability estimates in beef cattle based on identical and fraternal twin date. J. Anim. Sci., 24: 643–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, H. P., 1953. A study of variation in twin cattle. I. General description. J. Dairy Res., 20: 355–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, H. P., 1958. Evidence from twins on variation in growth and production of cattle. Proc. Xth Int. Congr. Genetics, 1: 225–235.Google Scholar
Geary, R. C., 1935. Cited in Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, 1954. Vol. 1, p. 62. Ed. E. S. Pearson and H. O. Hartley. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, J., 1932. Growth and the Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Johansson, I., 1958. The genetics of milk yield. Proc. Xth Int. Congr. Genetics, 1: 236–243.Google Scholar
Johansson, I., 1961. Genetic aspects of dairy cattle breeding. Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana, U.S.A.Google Scholar
King, J. W. B., & Donald, H. P., 1955. A study of variation in twin cattle. III. Growth. J. Dairy Res., 22: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendel, J., 1963. A study of variation in cattle twins and pairs of single-born animals, III body measurements. Z.Tierzücht Züchtungsbiol., 19: 319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shreffler, D. G., & Touchberry, R. W., 1959. Effects of crossbreeding on rate of growth in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 42: 607–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, St. C. S., 1962. Identical twins and developmental stability. Anim. Prod., 4: 144–164.Google Scholar
Taylor, St. C. S., 1963. Accuracy in measuring cattle with special reference to identical twins. Anim. Prod., 5: 105–115.Google Scholar
Taylor, St. C. S., & Craig, Jean, 1965. Genetic correlation during growth of twin cattle. Anim. Prod., 7: 83–101.Google Scholar
Theole, H. W., & Hervey, M. C., 1952. Growth uniformity trials with identical twin dairy heifers—estimates of heritability and twin efficiency. J. Dairy Sci., 35: 494–495 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Touchberry, R. W., 1951. Genetic correlations between five body measurements, weight type and production in the same individual among Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci., 34: 242–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, F., 1957. Die statistischen und genetischen Grundlagen von Korpermessungen und Rind. Z.Tierzücht Zuchtungsbiol., 69: 225–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar