Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:17:46.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of station and field tests for the improvement of milking performance in dairy cattle. II. Milking rate and time as indicators of a cow's milking ability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. J. M. Hinks ,
E. O. Nielsen  and
A. Neimann-Sørensen
C. J. M. Hinks
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Husbandry, Rolighedsvej 25, Copenhagen, Denmark
E. O. Nielsen
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Husbandry, Rolighedsvej 25, Copenhagen, Denmark
A. Neimann-Sørensen
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Husbandry, Rolighedsvej 25, Copenhagen, Denmark
Get access

Extract

An investigation of milking ability in three dairy breeds has shown that selection for superior productive performance would contribute little to the improvement of milking time. The heritability of both average rate of flow and milking time was reasonably high in all three breeds, however, and direct selection should result in effective improvements.

The problem of slow milking was more acute in the Danish Red breed, in which almost one cow in ten needed more than six minutes to milk out, than in the Black Pied or Danish Jersey breeds.

A comparison of the average rate of flow and milking time as criteria of selection for milking ability indicated that both measures were equally effective in the Black Pied and Jersey breeds, but that rate of flow was considerably more (40%) effective than milking time in the Danish Reds. This was largely because the heritability of milking time in this breed was only one-third that of milking rate.

It was concluded that the average rate of flow was to be preferred to milking time as a criterion of selection for milking ability in the Danish station testing programme.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , May 1968 , pp. 201 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andreae, U. 1954. Untersuchungen über die Melkbarkeit der Euterviertel. Dissertation, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Andreae, U. 1964. Einfluss der Gemelksgrösse und des Alters auf die Milchflussintensität bei Kiihen. Züchtungskunde 36: 340–355.Google Scholar
Baxter, E. S., Clarke, P. M., Dodd, F. H. and Foot, A. S. 1950. Factors affecting the rate of machine milking. J. Dairy Res. 17: 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, G. H., Fryer, G. C. and Roark, D. B. 1951. Use and interpretation of milk flow curves in measuring variations in the response of cows to machine milking. J. Dairy Sci. 34: 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumby, P. J. 1956. The milking characteristics of identical twin cattle. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 16: 89–94.Google Scholar
Brumby, P. J. 1961. The genetic basis of milk flow rates in cattle. VIII Internationaler Tierzuchtkongress, Hamburg, 171–173.Google Scholar
Clough, P. A. and Dodd, F. H. 1957. The relationship between milk secretion and the rate of milking by machine. J. Dairy Res. 24: 152–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desvignes, A. and Portous, M. 1963. [A preliminary study of the milking characteristics of dairy cows]. Ann. Zootech. (Paris) 12: 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, F. H. 1953. Normal variations in the rate of machine milking. J. Dairy Res. 20: 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, F. H. and Neave, F. K. 1951. Machine milking rate and mastitis. J. Dairy Res. 18: 240–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, H. P. 1960. Genetical aspects of maximum rate of flow during milking. J. Dairy Res. 27: 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeler, W., Keller, K. and Meli, H. 1964. [Results of ease of milking tests in Swiss Brown cattle]. Mitt. Schweiz. Braun VichzVerb. 4: 187–191.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. 1961. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Griffin, T. K. and Dodd, F. H. 1962. A note on the indirect measure of machine milking rate. J. Dairy Res. 29: 207–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Happ, H. 1962. [Genetic evaluation of bulls with regard to ease of milking]. Tierzüchter 15: 775–776.Google Scholar
Hickman, C. G. 1964. Teat shape and size in relation to production characteristics and mastitis in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 47: 777–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinks, C. J. M. 1968. The use of station and field tests for the improvement of milking performance in dairy cattle. I. Variation in milk yield and butterfat in test station records. Anim. Prod. 10: 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, I. and Malven, P. 1960. The infiuence of yield, udder pressure, size of teats and of the teat oriflce on rate of milking. Z. Tierzucht. ZüchtBiol. 74: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keestra, J. 1963. Melkbaarheidsonderzoek van het swartbontevee in Friesland. Versi. Landbouwk. Onderz. (Wageningen). 153 pp.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E. O., Nielsen, A. and Vesth, B. 1967. Afkomsprøver med tyre. XXI. Beretn. Forsøgslab., No. 355. 263 pp.Google Scholar
Nielsen, S. M. and Madsen, P. S. 1967. Heläarsforsøg med kvaeg. Beretn. Forsøgslab., No. 358: 24–33.Google Scholar
Politiek, R. D. 1964. [The examination of milking characteristics in dams of bulls]. Veetelt-en Zuivelber. 7: 313–326.Google Scholar
Sandvik, Ø. 1957. The relationship between milking rate and milk yield. J. Dairy Res. 24: 316–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venge, O. 1963. Investigations of milking characteristics in Swedish Red and White cattle. LantbrHögsk. Annlr 29: 187–214.Google Scholar