Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:28:23.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Separate and combined effects of ephedrine and caffeine on protein and lipid deposition in finishing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

N. Oksbjerg  and
M. T. Sørensen
N. Oksbjerg
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Science, Foulum Research Centre, PO Box 39, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
M. T. Sørensen
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Science, Foulum Research Centre, PO Box 39, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to examine the effects of dietary inclusion of an ephedrine (Eph)/caffeine (Caf) mixture on finishing (55 to 100 kg live weight) castrated male pigs. The first experiment was conducted as a dose-response study and showed that the mixture had an optimal effect on performance and carcass composition at a dietary inclusion level of approximately 56/560 mg/kg of Eph and Caf, respectively. In the second experiment, interactions between the compounds were studied by dietary inclusion of Eph (56 mg/kg) and Caf (560 mg/kg) separately or as a mixture (56/560 mg/kg). The mixture reduced food intake by 0·12 and improved the food: gain ratio by 0·08. Muscle protein deposition rate was increased proportionately by 0·25, lipid accretion rate was decreased proportionately by 0·27, and gross energetic efficiency of energy deposition decreased proportionately by 0·09. This resulted in a changed proportional carcass composition towards more muscle (0·08) and less fat (0·21) after treatment with the mixture. The reduction in food intake was sustained due to an interaction over the first 3 weeks of treatment changing to additive effects by the compounds. The increased muscle protein deposition rate after feeding the mixture was entirely due to Eph, while the decreased gross energetic efficiency of energy deposition was caused by Caf. On the other hand, both compounds contributed almost equally to the decrease in lipid accretion rate. These results show that an Eph/Caf mixture markedly improves performance and body composition in finishing castrated pigs.

Keywords

caffeinecarcass compositionephedrineperformancepigs
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , April 1995 , pp. 299 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, P. E. and Just, A. 1983. Tabeller over foderstoffers sammensaetning m. m. 8. udgave, Landhusholdningsselskabets Forlag, København.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Astrup, A., Buemann, B., Christensen, N. J., Victor, O. J., Thorbek, G., Isaksson, B. and Quaade, F. 1990a. Stimulation of energy expenditure and fat loss, and preservation of LBM by ephedrine/caffeine in obese women. A double blind placebo trial. International journal of Obesity 14: suppl. 2, p.49.Google Scholar
Astrup, A., Toubro, S., Cannon, S., Hein, P., Breum, L. and Madsen, J. 1990b. Caffeine: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of its thermogenic, metabolic, and cardiovascular effects in healthy volunteers. American journal of Clinical Nutrition 51: 759–767.Google Scholar
Astrup, A., Toubro, S., Cannon, S., Hein, P. and Madsen, J. 1990c. Thermogenic, metabolic, and cardiovascular effects of a sympathomimetic agent, ephedrine. Current Therapeutic Research 48: 1087–1100.Google Scholar
Astrup, A., Toubro, S., Cannon, S., Hein, P. and Madsen, J. 1990d. Thermogenic synergism between ephedrine and caffeine in healthy volunteers: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Metabolism 40: 1–7.Google Scholar
Boisen, S. and Fernández, J. A. 1991. In vitro digestibility of energy and amino acids in pig feeds. In Digestive physiology in pigs (ed. Verstegen, M. W. A., Huisman, J. and Hartzog, L. A.), pp. 231–236, Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Buttery, P. J., Dawson, J. M., Beever, D. E. and Bardsley, R. G. 1991. Manipulation of protein deposition in animals and possible consequences on the quality of animal. Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on protein metabolism and nutrition, European Association of Animal Production, publication no. 59, vol. 1, pp. 88–102.Google Scholar
Dulloo, A. G. and Miller, D. S. 1984. Thermogenic drugs for the treatment of obesity: sympathetic stimulants in animal models. British Journal of Nutrition 52: 179–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dulloo, A. G. and Miller, D. S. 1986. The thermogenic properties of ephedrine/methylxanthines mixtures: animal studies. American journal of Clinical Nutrition 43: 388–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulloo, A. G. and Miller, D. S. 1987a. Prevention of genetic fa/fa obesity with an ephedrine-methylxanthines thermogenic mixture. American journal of Physiology 252: R507–R513.Google ScholarPubMed
Dulloo, A. G. and Miller, D. S. 1987b. Reversal of obesity in the genetically obese fa/fa zucker rat with an ephedrine/methylxanthines thermogenic mixture. Journal of Nutrition 117: 383–389.Google Scholar
European Economic Community. 1979. Development of uniform methods for pig carcass classification in the EEC. Document Vl/5804/78 rev.Google Scholar
Fain, J. N. and Malbon, C. C. 1979. Regulation of adenylate cyclase by adenosine. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 25: 143–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
García-Sáinz, J. A. and Tomer, M. L. 1985. Rat fat-cells have three types of adenosine receptors (Ra Ri, and P). Biochemical journal 232: 439–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, H. M. and Robinson, D. W. 1971. Evidence for hypothalamic α and β-adrenergic receptors involved in the control of food intake in the pig. British Veterinary Journal 127: li–liii.Google Scholar
Just, A. 1982. The net energy value of crude (catabolized) protein for growth in pigs. Livestock Production Science 9: 349–360.Google Scholar
Londos, C., Cooper, D. M. F. and Wolff, J. 1980. Subclasses of external adenosine receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 77: 2551–2554.Google Scholar
Massoudi, M., Evans, E. and Miller, D. S. 1983. Thermogenic drugs for the treatment of obesity: screening using obese rats and mice. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 27: 26–37.Google Scholar
Milner, B. A. and Whiteside, P. J. 1981. Introduction to atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Pye Unicam Ltd, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1989. SAS user's guide: statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Stiles, G. L., Caron, M. G. and Lefkowitz, R. J. 1984. β-adrenergic receptors: biochemical mechanisms of physiological regulations. Physiological Reviews 64: 661–743.Google Scholar
Stoldt, W. 1952. Vorslag zur Vereinheitlichung der Fettbestimmung in Lebensmitteln. Fette u. Seifen 54: 206–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuffins, C. B. 1967. The determination of phosphate and calcium in feeding stuffs. Analyst, London 92: 107–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiner, N. 1980. Norepinephrine, epinephrine and the sympathomimetic amines. In The pharmacological basis of therapeutics (ed. Gilman, A. and Goodman, L. S.), pp. 138–175.Google Scholar
Williams, P. E. V. 1987. The use of β-agonists as a means of altering body composition in livestock species. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews. Series B 57: 453–464.Google Scholar