Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:12:05.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relative weight changes in the tissues of the gigot joint as Scottish Blackface castrated male lambs develop from weaning to maturity and an analysis of the observed individual variation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. H. Jackson
Affiliation:
The Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Get access

Summary

Eighty-two Scottish Blackface castrated male sheep were used to test whether, from weaning to near maturity, the gigot grew exactly proportionally to the half carcass and whether the tissue in the gigot grew at the same rate as the respective tissue of the half carcass.

While slight deviations from exact proportionality of growth occurred, none could be adjudged significant or important. If the gigot does not grow directly proportionally to the half carcass the data suggested that the gigot tended to grow slightly more slowly than the total half carcass over this period. If gigot muscle does not grow proportional to the total muscle the data suggested that gigot muscle might grow slightly more slowly. If growth of bone tissue is not directly proportional between the gigot and the half carcass the tendency was for the gigot bone to grow slightly faster than total bone while the fatty tissue of the gigot showed a slight tendency to grow more slowly than the half carcass fatty tissue.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barton, R. A. 1967. The relation between live animal conformation and the carcass of cattle. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 35: 121.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T., and Butterfield, R. M. 1966. Muscle : bone ratio and fat percentage as measures of beef carcass composition. Anim. Prod. 8: 111.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. 1964. Relative growth of the musculature of the ox. Symposium of carcass composition and appraisal of meat animals (ed. by Tribe, D. E.) C.S.I.R.O., Melbourne, Australia, 5: 111.Google Scholar
Cundiffe, L. V., Chambers, Doyle, Stephens, D. F. and Willham, R. L. 1964. Genetic analysis of some growth and carcass traits in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 11331138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, B. L., Le Guelte, P., and Arnoux, J. 1961. Étude biometrique des bovines de boucherie. I. Variabilite de la composition anatomique de la carcasse. Annls Zootech. 10: 149154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H., McDonald, I., and Fowler, V. R. 1964. The effect of plane of nutrition on the carcasses of pigs and lambs when variations in fat content are excluded. Anim. Prod. 6: 141154.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. 1932. Growth and the Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. 2nd ed.Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Jackson, T. H. 1967. The allometric relationship between carcass muscle and carcass bone in Scottish Blackface sheep. Anim. Prod. 9: 531533.Google Scholar
Luittngh, H. C. 1962. Developmental changes in beef steers as influenced by fattening, age and type of ration. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 58: 148.Google Scholar
Royal Smithfield Club (Undated) Major Beef Research Project. Underhill (Plymouth) Ltd., Regent Street, London.Google Scholar
Tulloh, N. M. 1963. Relation between carcass composition and live weight of sheep. Nature, Lond. 197: 809.Google Scholar