Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:45:03.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationships between fat depots and body condition score or tail fatness in the Rasa Aragonesa breed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. Teixeira
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Servicio de Investigación Agraria de la Diputación General de Aragón, Apartado 727 Zaragoza, Spain
R. Delfa
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Servicio de Investigación Agraria de la Diputación General de Aragón, Apartado 727 Zaragoza, Spain
F. Colomer-Rocher
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Servicio de Investigación Agraria de la Diputación General de Aragón, Apartado 727 Zaragoza, Spain
Get access

Abstract

The relationships between body fat depots and body condition score (BCS) were determined in 52 adult Rasa Aragonesa ewes aged 10 (s.d. 2) years and ranging in BCS from 1·5 to 4·5. BCS of each ewe was assessed by three people, the repeatability within individuals being 90% and between individuals 80%. The ewes were weighed before slaughter. After slaughter the omental, mesenteric, kidney and pelvic fat were separated and weighed. The fat of the left side of the carcass was separated into subcutaneous and intermuscular depots. The relationship between live weight and BCS was semilogarithmic and those between fat depots and BCS were logarithmic. Regression analysis was also used to describe the relationships between the various fat depots and BCS or live weight. Of the variation in total fat weight, proportionately 0·90 was accounted for by variations in BCS, while 0·84 was accounted for by variations in live weight. For individual fat depots proportionately 0·86 to 0·90 of the variation was accounted for by variation in BCS and 0·69 to 0·79 by variation in live weight. BCS was a better predictor than live weight of the weight of both total body fat and the individual fat depots.

A curvilinear regression between BCS and live weight showed that the increases in live weight for a unit change in BCS was 7, 10, 12 and 16 kg for each one point increase in BCS from 1 to 5 respectively.

The tail fat depot (tail fatness score) was assessed in the same ewes by score on a three-point scale. Of the variation in the weight of individual fat depots, proportionately 0·79 to 0·86 was accounted for by variation in tail fatness score. Thus the tail fatness score could be used as an additional method of assessing body condition in the Aragonesa breed.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Butler-Hogg, B. W. 1982. Fat partitioning in Clun and Southdown lambs. Animal Production 34: 377 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Donald, H. P., Read, J. L. and Russell, W. S. 1970. Influence of litter size and breed of sire on carcass weight and quality of lambs. Animal Production 12: 281290.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. G., Doney, J. M. and Russel, A. J. F. 1969. Fertility in Scottish Blackface ewes as influenced by nutrition and body condition at mating. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 73: 289294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, R. G., Doney, J. M. and Russel, A. J. F. 1972. Embryo mortality in Scottish Blackface ewes as influenced by body condition at mating and post-mating nutrition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79: 1925.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. G., Doney, J. M. and Smith, W. F. 1979. Fertility in Cheviot ewes. 2. The effect of level of pre-mating nutrition on ovulation rate and early embryo mortality in North and South Country Cheviot ewes in moderately good condition at mating. Animal Production 29: 1723.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. 1932. Growth and the Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. 2nd ed. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Huxley, J. S. 1932. Problems of Relative Growth, p. 276. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Jefferies, B. C. 1961. Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasmanian Journal of Agriculture 32: 1921.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J. 1980. Fat partition and distribution in the carcass of cattle, sheep and pigs: a review. Meat Science 5: 8398.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Croston, D. and Jones, D. W. 1987. Tissue growth and development in crossbreed lambs sired by ten breeds. Livestock Production Science 16: 145162.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J. and Cuthbertson, A. 1977. A survey of the carcass characteristics of the main types of British lamb. Animal Production 25: 165179.Google Scholar
McClelland, T. H. and Russel, A. J. F. 1972. The distribution of body fat in Scottish Blackface and Finnish Landrace lambs. Animal Production 15: 301306.Google Scholar
Milligan, K. E. and Broadbent, J. S. 1974. Condition scoring of sheep. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 34: 114 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Murray, J. A. 1919. Meat production. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 9: 174181.Google Scholar
Paramio, M. T. and Folch, J. 1985. Puntuación de la conditión corporal en la oveja Rasa Aragonesa y su relación con las reservas energeticas y los parametros reproductivos. Informacíon Técnica Económica Agravia 58: 2944.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. and Gunn, R. G. 1969. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72: 451454.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. and Gunn, R. G. 1971. The distribution of chemical fat in the bodies of Scottish Blackface ewes. Animal Production 31: 503509.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Gunn, R. G., Skhdd, E. and Doney, J. M. 1968. Relationships between chemical and physical composition of Scottish Blackface ewes. Animal Production 10: 5358.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. M., Atkins, K. D. and Gilmour, A. R. 1979. Carcass characteristics of heavyweight crossbred lambs. II. Carcass composition and partitioning of fat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30: 12071214.Google Scholar