Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:14:59.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationship of components of the body among mature cows as related to size, lactation potential and possible effects on productivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. G. Jenkins ,
C. L. Ferrell  and
L. V. Cundiff
T. G. Jenkins
Affiliation:
Roman L. Hruska US Meat Animal Research Center, US Department of Agriculture, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933, USA
C. L. Ferrell
Affiliation:
Roman L. Hruska US Meat Animal Research Center, US Department of Agriculture, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933, USA
L. V. Cundiff
Affiliation:
Roman L. Hruska US Meat Animal Research Center, US Department of Agriculture, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933, USA
Get access

Abstract

Attributes of lactation and weight of components of the empty body were analysed to evaluate relationships between performance potential of various breeds or breed crosses and the proportion of empty-body components relative to slaughter weight. Differences in major internal organs attributable to breed, breed cross, level of food intake, mature body size and milk production potential were observed. Milk yield was positively related to proportion of lung tissue, tended to be positively related to head and liver tissues but was negatively related to the proportion of warm carcass. As estimated from a three breed diallel, significant additive breed direct effects were observed for several empty-body components. In general, heterosis tended to be non-significant for all proportions of body components with the exception of proportion of head, fore and hind feet and lung tissue. Breed crosses characterized as having greater potential for mature weight were heavier at slaughter and had a greater proportion of structural components such as head, hide and fore and hind feet. Differences among visceral organs associated with production potential for size and milk production are discussed relative to the possible effect on basal energy expenditure and the effect these differences may have on the energy requirements for a cow/calf livestock enterprise.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , October 1986 , pp. 245 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, B. B. 1980. Feeding trials describing net requirements for maintenance as dependent on weight, feeding level, sex and genotype. Proceedings of Seminar on Energy and Protein Feeding Standards Applied to the Rearing and Finishing of Beef Cattle. Annales de Zootechnie Special Number, pp. 85–92.Google Scholar
Canas, R., Romero, J. J. and Baldwin, R. L. 1982. Maintenance energy requirements during lactation in rats. Journal of Nutrition 112: 1876–1880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, J. W., Ramsey, C. B., Hobbs, C. S. and Temple, R. S. 1964. Effects of type and. breed of British, Zebu and dairy cattle on production, carcass composition and palatability. Journal of Dairy Science 47: 1138–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cundiff, L. V., Ferrell, C. L. and Jenkins, T. G. 1983. Output/input differences among F, cows of diverse biological type. Journal of Animal Science 57: Suppl. 1, p. 148 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Ferrell, C. L. and Jenkins, T. G. 1984. Energy utilization by mature, nonpregnant, nonlactating cows of different types. Journal of Animal Science 58: 234–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrell, C. L. and Jenkins, T. G. 1986. Cow type and the nutritional environment. Journal of Animal Science In press.Google Scholar
Frisch, J. E. and Vercoe, J. E. 1976. Maintenance requirements fasting metabolism and body composition in different cattle breeds. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals (ed. Vermorel, M.), pp. 209–212. Bussac, Clermont-Ferrand.Google Scholar
Frisch, J. E. and Vercoe, J. E. 1977. Food intake, eating rate, weight gains, metabolic rate and efficiency of feed utilization in Bos taurus and Bos indicus crossbred cattle. Animal Production 25: 343–358.Google Scholar
Garrett, W. N. 1971. Energetic efficiency of beef and dairy steers. Journal of Animal Science 32: 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, K. E. 1972. Beef cattle type for maximum efficiency “Putting it all together”. Journal of Animal Science 34: 881–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, K. E. and Cundiff, L. V. 1980. Crossbreeding in beef cattle: Evaluation of systems. Journal of Animal Science 51: 1224–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, K. E., Cundiff, L. V., Smith, G. M., Laster, D. B. and Fitzhugh, H. A. 1978. Characterization of biological types of cattle — cycle II: I. Birth and weaning traits. Journal of Animal Science 47: 1022–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, T. G. and Ferrell, C. L. 1983. Nutrient requirements to maintain weight of mature, nonlactating, nonpregnant cows of four diverse breed types. Journal of Animal Science 56: 761–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, T. G. and Ferrell, C. L. 1984. A note on lactation curves of crossbred cows. Animal Production 39: 479–482.Google Scholar
Jenkins, T. G., Long, C. R., Cartwright, T. C. and Smith, G. C. 1981. Characterization of cattle of a fivebreed diallel. IV. Slaughter and carcass characters of serially slaughtered bulls. Journal of Animal Science 53: 62–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klosterman, E. W., Sanford, L. G. and Parker, C. F. 1968. Effect of cow size and condition and ration protein content upon maintenance requirements of mature beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 27: 242–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koong, L. J., Ferrell, C. L. and Nienaber, J. A. 1982. Effects of plane of nutrition on organ size and fasting heat production in swine and sheep. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals (ed. Ekern, A. and Sundstøl, F.), pp. 245–248. Agricultural University of Norway, Aas-NLH.Google Scholar
Koong, L. J., Ferrell, C. L. and Nienaber, J. A. 1986. Assessment of interrelationships among level of intake and production, organ size and fasting heat production in growing animals. Journal of Nutrition. In press.Google Scholar
Koong, L. J., Nienaber, J. A. and Mersmann, H. J. 1983. Effects of plane of nutrition on organ size and fasting heat production in genetically obese and lean pigs. Journal of Nutrition 113: 1626–1631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laster, D. B., Smith, G. M. and Gregory, K. E. 1976. Characterization of biological types of cattle. IV. Postweaning growth and puberty of heifers. Journal of Animal Science 43: 63–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ledger, H. P. and Sayers, A. R. 1977. The utilization of dietary energy by steers during periods of restricted food intake and subsequent realimentation. 1. The effect of time on the maintenance requirements of steers held at constant live weights. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88: 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leymaster, K. A. and Jenkins, T. G. 1985. Characterization of accretive rates for growth constituents in male Suffolk sheep. Journal of Animal Science 61: 430–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, R. M., Rempel, W. E., Cornelius, S. G. and Allen, C. E. 1984. Visceral characteristics of three breeds of swine and their crosses. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64: 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moav, R. 1966a. Specialised sire and dam lines. II. The choice of most profitable parental combination when component traits are genetically additive. Animal Production 8: 203–211.Google Scholar
Moav, R. 1966b. Specialised sire and dam lines. III. Choice of the most profitable parental combination when component traits are genetically non-additive. Animal Production 8: 365–374.Google Scholar
Neville, W. E. 1974. Comparison of energy requirements of non-lactating and lactating Hereford cows and estimates of energetic efficiency of milk production. Journal of Animal Science 38: 681–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Notter, D. R., Cundiff, L. V., Smith, G. M., Laster, D. B. and Gregory, K. E. 1978a. Characterization of biological types of cattle. VI. Transmitted and maternal effects on birth and survival traits in progeny of young cows. Journal of Animal Science 46: 892–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Notter, D. R., Cundiff, L. V., Smith, G. M., Laster, D. B. and Gregory, K. E. 1978b. Characterization of biological types of cattle. VII. Milk production in young cows and transmitted and maternal effects on preweaning growth of progeny. Journal of Animal Science 46: 908–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, A. J. F. and Wright, I. A. 1983. Factors affecting maintenance requirements of beef cows. Animal Production 37: 329–334.Google Scholar
Smith, G. M., Laster, D. B. and Gregory, K. E. 1976. Characterization of biological types of cattle. I. Dystocia and preweaning growth. Journal of Animal Science 43: 27–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sundstol, F. N., Standal, N. and Vangen, O. 1979. Energy metabolism in lines of pigs selected for thickness of backfat and rate of gain. Ada Agriculturae Scandinavica 29: 337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, T. G., Wood, J. D., Gregory, N. G. and Hart, I. C. 1983. Fat deposition in Hereford and Friesian steers. 3. Growth efficiency and fat mobilization. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100: 277–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, L. D., Cundiff, L. V., Crouse, J. D., Smith, G. M. and Gregory, K. E. 1978. Characterization of biological types of cattle. VIII. Postweaning growth and carcass traits of three-way cross steers. Journal of Animal Science 46: 1178–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar