Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:43:22.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Production, carcass and meat quality traits of F2-crosses between European Wild Pigs and domestic pigs including halothane gene carriers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

K. Lundström ,
A. Karlsson ,
J. Håkansson ,
I. Hansson ,
M. Johansson ,
L. Andersson  and
K. Andersson
K. Lundström
Affiliation:
Departments of Food Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
A. Karlsson
Affiliation:
Departments of Food Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
J. Håkansson
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
I. Hansson
Affiliation:
Departments of Food Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
M. Johansson
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
L. Andersson
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
K. Andersson
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

A pedigree originally designed for pig genome mapping was used in order to study carcass and muscle development as well as meat quality of F2-crosses between the European Wild Pig and the domestic Large White pig (no. = 191). As a marker for the influence of genes inherited from the ‘wild’ and domestic grandparents, grouping based on the length of the small intestine was used. The pigs were also typed for genetic polymorphism at the calcium release channel (CRO locus controlling halothane susceptibility in pigs, and one of the Wild boars was found to be a carrier of the halothane mutation. At assessment, the carcasses were divided into cuts, the back and ham were defatted, and m. longissimus dorsi and the large muscles of the ham were weighed separately.

Wlien grouped according to length of the small intestine, those animals with a short small intestine were more similar to Wild Pig, e.g. they were older at slaughter and had a slower growth rate than the other group. Their carcasses contained less lean meat, more flare fat and more subcutaneous fat. No difference in meat quality could be discerned between the groups, except for a tendency to greater pigment content and higher shear force value in the group with a short small intestine.

The effect of the halothane mutation at the CRC locus was very prominent, although no animals had the gene in homozygous form. Carriers of the gene were leaner and had a higher reflectance value, lower water-holding capacity, lower pHu, higher protein denaturation and higher shear force value.

Keywords

carcass compositionhalothane susceptibilitymeat qualitypigssmall intestine
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , October 1995 , pp. 325 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, K. 1980. Studies on crossbreeding and carcass evaluation in pigs. Dissertation. Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agicultnral Sciences, Uppsala, Report 46.Google Scholar
Andersson, K. 1984. SLU-normen-en ny utfodringsnorm till slaktsvin. Fakta-Husdjur no. 15. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Andersson, L., Archibald, A. L., Gellin, J. and Schook, L. B. 1993. 1st pig gene mapping workshop (PGM1), 7 August 1992, Interlaken, Switzerland. Animal Genetics 24: 205–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersson, L., Haley, C. S., Ellegren, H., Knott, S. A., Johansson, M., Andersson, K., Andersson-Eklund, L., Edfors-Lilja, I., Fredholm, M., Hansson, I., Hakansson, J. and Lundstrom, K. 1994. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for growth and fatness in pigs. Science, USA 263: 1771–1774.Google ScholarPubMed
Boles, J. A., Parrish, F. C., Skaggs, C. L. and Christian, L. L. 1991. Effect of porcine somatotropin, stress susceptibility, and final end point of cooking on the sensory, physical and chemical properties of pork loin chops. Journal of Animal Science 69: 2865–2870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clausen, H. and Gerwig, C. 1955. Resultate eines Versuches betreffend Verdrängungskreuzung dänische Landrasse × europäisches Wildschwein. In Schzveinezucht und Scluveincleistungspriifungen unter besonderer Beriicksichtigung diinischer Versuchsergebnisse, pp. 32–35. Schriften der Schweiz. Vereinigung fiir Tierzucht, nr 20. Benteli-Verlag, Bern-Bümpliz.Google Scholar
Clausen, H. and Nielsen, H. E. 1962/1963. Der Einfluss von Zucht und Futterung auf die Langenzunahme des Darmkanals bein Schwein. Zeitschrift fiir Tierziichtung and Ziichtungsbiologie 78: 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, J., Otsu, K., Zorzato, F., De Leon, S., Khanna, V. K., Weiler, J. E., O'Brien, P. J. and MacLennan, D. H. 1991. Identification of a mutation in porcine ryanodine receptor associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science, USA 253: 448–451.Google ScholarPubMed
Håkansson, J. and Andersson, J. 1992. Foder till vildsvinskorsningar. Fakta-Husdjur no. 8. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Upsala.Google Scholar
Honikel, K. O. 1987. How to measure water-holding capacity of meat? Recommendation of standardized methods. In Evaluation and control of meat quality in pigs (ed. Tarrant, P. V., Eikelenboom, G. and Monin, G.), pp. 129–142. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, M., Ellegren, H., Marklund, L., Gustavsson, U., Ringmar-Cederberg, E., Andersson, K., Edfors-Lilja, I. and Andersson, L. 1992. The gene for dominant white color in the pig is closely linked to ALB and PDGFRA on chromosome 8. Genomics 14: 965–969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karlsson, A., Enfalt, A-C., Essen-Gustavsson, B., Lundstrom, K., Rydhmer, L. and Stern, S. 1993. Muscle histochemical and biochemical properties in relation to meat quality during selection for increased lean tissue growth rate in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 71: 930–938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karlsson, A. and Lundstrom, K. 1991. Meat pigment determination by a simple and non-toxic alkaline haematin method — (an alternative to the Hornsey and the cyanometmyoglobin methods). Meat Science 29: 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, R. G., Eikelenboom, G., Wai, P. G. van der, Merkus, G. and Zaar, M. 1986. The use of filter paper to estimate drip loss of porcine musculature. Meat Science 18: 191–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundström, K., Barton-Gade, P., Andersson, R. J. and Hansson, I. 1988. Pale pig meat — relative influence of PSE and low pigment content. Proceedings of the thirty-fourth international congress of meat science and technology, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 584–587.Google Scholar
Lundstrom, K., Essen-Gustavsson, B., Rundgren, M., Edfors-Lilja, I. and Malmfors, G. 1989. Effect of halothane genotype on muscle metabolism at slaughter and its relationship with meat quality: a within-litter comparison. Meat Science 25: 251–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McPhee, C. P., Thornton, R. F., Trappett, P. C., Biggs, J. S., Shorthose, W. R. and Ferguson, D. M. 1991. A comparison of the effects of porcine somatotropin, genetic selection and sex on performance, carcase and meat quality traits of pigs fed ad libitum. Livestock Production Science 28: 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariani, P., Johansson, M., Ellegren, H., Harbitz, I., Juneja, R. K. and Andersson, L. 1992. Multiple restriction fragment length polymorphisms in the porcine calcium release channel gene (CRC ): assignment to the halothane (HAL) linkage group. Animal Genetics 23: 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersson, H., Häkansson, J. and Eriksson, S. 1979. A preliminary study of the length, area and dryweight of the small intestine in slaughter pigs. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 9: 75–82.Google Scholar
Rede, R., Pribisch, V. and Rahelic, S. 1986. Untersuchungen iiber die beschaffenheit von Schlachttierkdrpern und Fleisch primitiver und hochselektierter Schweinerassen. Fleischwirtschaft 66: 898–907.Google Scholar
Rundgren, M., Lundström, K. and Edfors-Lilja, I. 1990. A within-litter comparison of the three halothane genotypes. 2. Performance, carcass quality, organ development and long-term effects of transportation and amperozide. Livestock Production Science 26: 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1989. SAS/STATR user's guide, version 6, 4th ed. vol. 2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Townsend, W. E., Brown, W. L., McCampbell, H. C. and Davis, C. E. 1978. Comparison of chemical, physical and sensory properties of loins from Yorkshire, crossbred and wild pigs. Journal of Animal Science 46: 646–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, W. E., Brown, W. L., McCampbell, H. C. and Davis, C. E. 1979. Chemical, physical, curing and sensory properties of hams from Yorkshire, crossbred and wild pigs. Journal of Animal Science 49: 1219–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vries, A. G. de., Wai, P. G. van der, Long, T., Eikelenboom, G. and Merks, J. W. M. 1994. Genetic parameters of pork quality and production traits in Yorkshire populations. Livestock Production Science 40: 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, J. D. and Nute, G. R. 1990. Carcass and meat quality in Iron Age' pigs. Animal Production 50: 566 (abstr.).Google Scholar