No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Problems involved in the utilization of alkali-treated fibrous roughages 1. The effects of level of roughage and protein in the diet and neutralization of residual alkali†
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2010
Abstract
Wheat straw treated with 35 g NaOH per kg was offered to male calves at three levels: 300 (A), 500 (B), and 700 (C) g/kg diet, in a metabolism trial and in a feeding trial. In the former the wheat straw was offered either neutralized with HC1 (N) or unneutralized (U), in six subtreatments (AN, BN, CN, AU, BU and CU) in a 3 × 2 factorial design to a total of 24 calves. Dry-matter intake per kg W0·73 was 123, 108, 104, 122, 105 and 91 g/day, and the digestibility of the organic matter of the straw was 0·388, 0·616, 0·629, 0·385, 0·528 and 0·544 respectively. The apparent digestibility of the crude protein of the straw was negative. Nitrogen retention per kg W0·73 was 0·91, 0·58, 0·52, 0·97, 0·57 and 0·50 g/day, respectively.
In the feeding trial, unneutralized, NaOH-treated wheat straw was offered to a total of 84 calves for 100 days at the above three levels with two protein levels: standard, 120 g/kg (S) and high, 140 g/kg (H), in six subtreatments (AS, BS, CS, AH, BH and CH) in a 3 × 2 factorial design. The concentrates were pelleted. From day 101 to slaughter all the calves were offered one finishing diet.
Level of protein had no effect on performance. Increasing the levels of straw in the first 100 days sharply reduced average daily gains; these were 1 074, 825 and 583 g, respectively. However, the respective average daily gains on the finishing diet were 1 131, 1 272 and 1 316 g, indicating a considerable amount of compensatory growth.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983
References
REFERENCES
Acock, C. W., Ward, J. K., Rush, I. G. and Klopfenstein, T. J. 1979. Wheat straw and sodium hydroxide treatment in beef cow rations. J. Anim. Sci. 49: 354–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, L. L., Klopfenstein, T. J. and Britton, R. A. 1979. Effect of sodium hydroxide on efficiency of rumen digestion. J. Anim. Sci. 49: 1317–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, L. L., Klopfenstein, T. J. and Britton, R. A. 1980. Effect of sodium hydroxide treatment on rate of passage and rate of ruminal fiber digestion. J. Anim. Sci. 50: 745–749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braman, W. L. and Abe, R. K. 1977. Laboratory and in vivo evaluation of the nutritive value of NaOH-treated wheat straw. J. Anim. Sci. 45: 496–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, J. B., Dinius, D. A. and Wheeler, W. E. 1979. Effect of alkali treatment on intake and digestion of barley straw by beef steers. J. Anim. Sci. 49: 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottyn, B. C. and Boucque, C. V. 1968. Rapid method for gas-chromatographic determination of volatile fatty acids in rumen fluid. J. agric. Fd Chem. 16: 105–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulombe, J. J. and Favreau, L. 1963. A new simple semi-micro method for the colorimetric determination of urea. Clin. Chem. 9: 102–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, W. N., Walker, H. G., Kohler, G. O. and Hart, M. R. 1979. Response of ruminants to diets containing sodium hydroxide or ammonia treated rice straw. J. Anim. Sci. 48: 92–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. 1976. Improving the nutritive value of straw by alkali treatment. A.R.C. Res. Rev. 2: 67–70.Google Scholar
Hasimoglu, S., Klopfenstein, T. J. and Doane, T. H. 1969. Nitrogen source with sodium hydroxide treated wheat straw. J. Anim. Sci. 29: 160 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Jackson, M. G. 1977. Review article: The alkali treatment of straws. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 2: 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klopfenstein, T. J. 1978. Chemical treatment of crop residues. J. Anim. Sci. 46: 841–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, V. F., Israelsen, M. and Neimann-sØrensen, A. 1981. Processed feed from straw for ruminants. Rep. Natn. Inst. Anim. Sci., Copenhagen, pp. 1–22. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Levy, D., Holzer, Z. and Folman, Y. 1980. Chemical processing of wheat straw and cotton by-products for fattening cattle. 3. Performance of animals receiving material in complete feeds. Anim. Prod. 31: 27–33.Google Scholar
Miller, E. L., Johnson, I. L., Briggs, M. C. E. andK Empsey, R. G. 1977. The effect of alkali and urea on ground and pelleted all-straw diets for sheep. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 36: 129A (abstr.).Google ScholarPubMed
National Research Council. 1971. Atlas of Nutritional Data on United States and Canadian Feeds. National Academy of Science, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Oji, U. I., Mowat, D. N. and Winch, J. E. 1977. Alkali treatment of corn stover to increase nutritive value. J. Anim. Sci. 44: 798–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and Grubb, D. A. 1978. Validation of new systems for protein evaluation in ruminants by testing the effect of urea supplementation on intake and digestibility of straw with or without sodium hydroxide treatment. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 91: 483–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, E. 1979. Processing of roughages. In Recent advances in Animal Nutrition—1978 (ed. Haresign, W. and Lewis, D.), pp. 127–148. Butterworth, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rexen, F., Stigsen, P. and Kristensen, F. V. 1976. The effect of a new alkali technique on the nutritive value of straws. In Feed Energy Sources for Livestock (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 65–82. Butterworth, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, S. K., Otterby, D. E., Donker, J. D. and Good, A. L. 1971. Effects of feeding alkali-treated oat straw supplemented with soybean meal or nonprotein nitrogen on growth of lambs and on certain blood and rumen liquor parameters. J. Anim. Sci. 33: 485–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed