Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:26:21.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pre-pubertal mammogenesis in the sheep 3. The effects of restricted feeding or daily administration of bovine growth hormone and bromocriptine on mammary growth and morphology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. D. Johnsson ,
I. C. Hart  and
A. Turvey
I. D. Johnsson
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
I. C. Hart
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
A. Turvey
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
Get access

Abstract

In crossbred female lambs reared on a concentrate diet between 8 and 20 weeks of age, a restriction in food intake to 40 g/kg body weight per day decreased live-weight gain (155 g/day) compared with that in control lambs fed ad libitum (284 g/day) and significantly reduced final live weight and the size of the mammary fat pad (P < 0·001). However, restricted lambs at 20 weeks had more total parenchymal deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA; 54·7 v. 47·5 mg) occupying a greater mass of mammary fat pad (17·0 v. 13·2 g) than control lambs (P > 0·10). Restricted feeding had little effect on mean plasma growth hormone (GH) concentrations at 12 and 18 weeks of age, but decreased plasma insulin and prolactin concentrations.

In lambs fed ad libitum, daily subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of 0·1 mg bovine pituitary GH per kg live weight between 8 and 20 weeks of age significantly increased daily live-weight gain (347 g/day; P < 0·001) and also increased total mammary parenchymal DNA (71·2 mg; P < 0·10) and the mass of fat pad occupied by parenchymal tissue (20·6 g; P < 0·05), compared with the control treatment. Daily s.c. injection of bromocriptine (1 mg/day) had no effect on either body or mammary growth, but tended to reduce the effects of bovine GH when given in combination. Secretory activity was observed in the parenchymal tissue of the eight lambs receiving bovine GH alone, and also in five control lambs and three lambs receiving bromocriptine alone. Three lambs that had attained puberty by 20 weeks of age had the poorest mammary development of their respective treatment groups.

Mammary gland development at 20 weeks of age was significantly correlated across treatment means with plasma GH concentrations estimated at 18 weeks of age (r = 0·95; P < 0·05), but no correlations of similar magnitude were found between individuals within treatments at 20 weeks. Strongest correlations were found among 8-week-old lambs, where mammary parenchymal DNA was positively correlated with mean plasma GH (r = 0·62) and the GH:insulin ratio (r = 0·79) and negatively correlated with the prolactin:GH ratio (r = -0·65).

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , February 1986 , pp. 53 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, R. R. 1975. Mammary gland growth in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 41: 118–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowie, A. T., Forsyth, I. A. and Hart, I. C. 1980. Hormonal Control of Lactation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, S. 1961. Studies on the serial extraction of pituitary proteins. Endocrinology 69: 554–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ensor, D. M. 1978. Comparative Endocrinology of Prolactin. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Gordon, H. and Sweet, H. H. 1936. A simple method for the silver impregnation of reticulum. Am. J. Physiol. 12: 545–551.Google ScholarPubMed
Harrison, R. D., Reynolds, I. P. and Little, W. 1983. A quantitative analysis of mammary glands of dairy heifers reared at different rates of live-weight gain. J. Dairy Res. 50: 405–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnsson, I. D. and Hart, I. C. 1984. The effects of exogenous bovine growth hormone and bromocryptine mesilate on mammary development in ewe lambs. Anim. Prod. 38: 523 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Johnsson, I. D. and Hart, I. C. 1985. Pre-pubertal mammogenesis in the sheep. 1. The effects of level of nutrition on growth and mammary development in female lambs. Anim. Prod. 41: 323–332.Google Scholar
Johnsson, I. D., Hart, I. C. and Butler-hogg, B. 1985a. The effects of exogenous bovine growth hormone and bromocriptine on growth, body development, fleece weight and plasma concentrations of growth hormone, insulin and prolactin in female lambs. Anim. Prod. 41: 207–217.Google Scholar
Johnsson, I. D., Hart, I. C., Simmonds, A. D. and Morant, S. V. 1985b. Pre-pubertal mammogenesis in the sheep. 2. The effects of level of nutrition on the plasma concentrations of GH, insulin and prolactin at various ages in female lambs and their relationship with mammary development. Anim. Prod. 41: 333–340.Google Scholar
Petitclerc, D., Chapin, L. T. and Tucker, H. A. 1984. Carcass composition and mammary development responses to photoperiod and plane of nutrition in Holstein heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 58: 913–919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritchard, D. E., Hafs, H. D., Tucker, H. A., Boyd, L. J., Purchas, R. W. and Huber, J. T. 1972. Growth, mammary, reproductive and pituitary hormone characteristics of Holstein heifers fed extra grain and melengestrol acetate. J. Dairy Sci. 55: 995–1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, I. P. 1982. The impairment of lactation associated with rapid growth in Friesian heifers. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Reading.Google Scholar
Sejrsen, K. 1984. Effect of anabolic steroids and growth hormone on mammary development in heifers. In Manipulation of Growth in Farm Animals (ed. Roche, J. F. and O'Callaghan, D.), pp. 233–245. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sejrsen, K., Foldager, J., Sorensen, M. T. and Bauman, D. E. 1983a. Regulation of mammary development in dairy heifers. 34th A. Meet. Study Commission Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod., Madrid. Paper No. c5a.2.Google Scholar
Sejrsen, K., Huber, J. T. and Tucker, H. A. 1983b. Influence of amount fed on hormone concentrations and their relationship to mammary growth in heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 66: 845–855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sejrsen, K., Huber, J. T., Tucker, H. A. and Akers, R. M. 1982. Influence of nutrition on mammary development in pre- and postpubertal heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 65: 793–800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sykes, J. F. and Wrenn, T. R. 1950. Hormonal development of the mammary gland of dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 33: 194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umberger, S. H. 1980. The effect of accelerated growth and fattening from early weaning to parturition on ewe reproduction and lactation. Ph.D. Thesis, N. C. State Univ., Raleigh.Google Scholar
Wallace, C. 1953. Observations on mammary development in.calves and lambs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 43: 413–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weibel, E. R. 1979. Stereological Methods. Vol. 1. Practical Methods for Biological Morphometry. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar