Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:00:51.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance of Friesian cows with high and low breeding indexes 2. Energy and nitrogen balance experiments with lactating and pregnant, non-lactating cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. Grainger ,
C. W. Holmes  and
Y. F. Moore
C. Grainger
Affiliation:
Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
C. W. Holmes
Affiliation:
Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Y. F. Moore
Affiliation:
Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access

Abstract

Six lactating Friesian cows (three high and three low breeding index cows) were subjected to a total of 28 complete energy and nitrogen balances during early and late lactation. In addition, 12 non-lactating Friesian cows (six high and six low breeding index cows) were offered individually pasture indoors for 62 days, beginning at approx. 180 days of pregnancy. Cows within each genotype were randomly allocated to feeding levels which were nominally equivalent to their requirements for maintenance or twice maintenance. Eight of the 12 cows (four high and four low breeding index) were each subjected to two energy balance periods at approx. 210 (period 1) and 230 (period 2) days of pregnancy.

When offered pasture ad libitum during lactation, cows with high breeding indexes consumed significantly more gross energy per unit of metabolic live weight (P < 0·05) than did cows with low breeding indexes, but the two genotypes did not differ in their ability to metabolize the gross energy of the food, or in the individual losses of energy in faeces, urine or methane.

There were no significant differences between genotypes in their heat production at a common energy intake except during restricted feeding in early lactation when high breeding index cows produced less heat than did low breeding index cows (P < 0·05). During lactation high breeding index cows retained a higher proportion of their total energy retention (milk + body tissue energy) as milk in late lactation (P < 0·01) but not in early lactation.

For non-lactating cows, both genotypes required similar amounts of metabolizable energy to maintain zero maternal body energy retention, 0·79 and 0·80 MJ/M0·75 for periods 1 and 2 respectively. The efficiency with which metabolizable energy was converted to net energy (kg) was similar for both genotypes at both stages of pregnancy, the mean value being 0·52. The metabolizable energy required to maintain body condition was estimated to be 0·78 and 0·71 MJ/M0·75 for high and low breeding index cows respectively. The metabolizable energy required in excess of maintenance to promote a gain of one unit of body condition was estimated to be 2290 MJ. This is equivalent to 27 MJ energy retained per kg live-weight gain.

For lactating and non-lactating cows the differences between genotypes in their utilization of nitrogen were small and inconsistent.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , June 1985 , pp. 389 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Brouwer, E. 1965. Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. In Energy Metabolism (ed. Blaxter, K. L.), pp. 441–443. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Ekern, A., Blaxter, K. L. and Sawers, D. 1965. The effect of artificial drying on the energy value of grass. Br. J. Nutr. 19: 417–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, J. L. 1978. Design and Analysis of Experiments in the Animal and Medical Sciences. Vol. 2. Iowa State University Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Grainger, C., Davey, A. W. F. and Holmes, C. W. 1985. Performance of Friesian cows with high and low breeding indexes. 1. Stall feeding and grazing experiments and performance during the whole lactation. Anim. Prod. 40: 379–388.Google Scholar
Grainger, C. and McGowan, A. A. 1982. significance of pre-calving nutrition of the dairy cow. In Dairy Production front Pasture (ed, MacMillan, K. L. and Taufa, V. K.), pp. 134–171. Clark and Matheson, Hamilton, NZ.Google Scholar
Grieve, D. G., MacLeod, G. K., Batra, T. R., Burnside, E. B. and Stone, J. B. 1976. Relationship of feed intake and ration digestibility to estimated transmitting ability, body weight, and efficiency in first lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 59: 1312–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, C. W. and McLean, N. R. 1974. The effect of low ambient temperatures on the energy metabolism of sows. Anim. Prod. 19: 1–12.Google Scholar
Kleiber, M. 1965. Metabolic body size. In Energy Metabolism (ed. Blaxter, K. L.), pp. 427–432. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Kramer, C. Y. 1978. An overview of multivariate analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 61: 848–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, P. W. and Tyrrell, H. F. 1972. Metabolizable energy requirements of pregnant dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 55: 480–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, I. M. 1976. Modifications in the structure of the triacylglycerols of bovine milk fat. Ph.D Thesis, Fac. Biochem., Massey Univ.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967. Statistical Methods. 6th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Triog, T. E. and Parr, C. W. 1981. Aspects of energy metabolism of Jersey cows differing in breeding index. Proc. NZ Soc. Anim. Prod. 41: 44–47.Google Scholar
Van Es, A. J. H. 1976. Factors affecting the efficiency of energy utilization by beef and dairy cattle. In Principles of Cattle Production (ed. Swan, H. and Broster, W. H.), pp. 237–253. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Young, B. A., Kerrigan, B. and Christopherson, R. J. 1975. A versatile respiratory pattern analyzer for studies of energy metabolism of livestock. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 55: 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar