Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:23:12.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on the value of dried citrus pulp and grape marc as barley replacements in calf fattening diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. Hadjipanayiotou
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
A. Louca
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
Get access

Summary

Two trials with 44 and 30 British Friesian male calves were conducted over a period of 48 and 30 weeks respectively, to study the value of dried citrus pulp and grape marc as substitutes for part of the barley in calf-fattening diets. In each case the diets were fortified with additional crude protein to compensate for the lower digestible crude protein contents of these substitutes.

Including dried citrus pulp at 60% of the concentrate diet had no effect on calf performance or feed intake, and provided additional protein is supplied, citrus pulp appears to compare favourably with barley as an energy source.

Inclusion of grape marc at 15 and 30% of the diet tended to reduce live-weight gain at the higher level and to reduce killing-out percentage and increase feed intake at both levels, resulting in poor feed utilization. Its value as an energy source appears to be about half that of barley.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock.No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Economides, S. 1974. The effect of dried citrus pulp and grape marc on milk yield and milk composition of dairy cows. Tech. paper agric. Res. Inst., Nicosia, Cyprus, No. 7.Google Scholar
Economides, S. and Hadjidemtriou, D. 1974. The nutritive value of some agricultural by-products. Tech. Bull, agric. Res. Inst., Nicosia, Cyprus, No. 18.Google Scholar
Louca, A. and Papas, A. 1973. The effect of different proportions of carob pod meal in the diet on the performance of calves and goats. Anim. Prod. 17: 139146.Google Scholar
Mavrogenis, A., Louca, A. and Lawlor, M. J. 1973. The use of grape pulp, grape seed meal and barley straw in lamb fattening diets. Tech. Bull, agric. Res. Inst., Nicosia, Cyprus, No. 12.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M. J. and Baumgardt, B. R. 1965. Regulation of food intake in ruminants. I. Pelleted rations varying in energy concentration. J. Dairy Sci. 48: 569574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council. 1971. Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. No. 3. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 4th ed. National Research Council, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Sánchez Vizcaíno, E. and Smilg, N. 1971. [Energy value of a grape by-product for sheep.] Revta Nutr. anim. 9: 153166.Google Scholar