Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:51:29.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the use of sarcomere length measurements as predictors of longitudinal growth in skeletal muscles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. V. J. Hegarty
P. V. J. Hegarty
Affiliation:
Meat Research Department, The Agricultural Institute, Castleknock, Co. Dublin, Ireland
Get access

Summary

Sarcomere length and fibre diameter were measured in the biceps brachii and sternomastoideus muscles from 35 male mice (5·3-38·0 g body weight). The fore-limbs of each animal were either folded or stretched maximally immediately post mortem and allowed to go into rigor mortis in that position. Unfixed isolated fibres were separated and the sarcomere length and fibre diameter measured. Sarcomere length remained unchanged with increasing body weight irrespective of whether the muscles were in the folded or stretched position. Sarcomere length was shorter in the folded biceps brachii (P < 0·01) and sternomastoideus (P < 0·05) than in the corresponding stretched muscles at all body weights. The results indicate that sarcomere length cannot be used as an indicator of the longitudinal growth of muscle, and that limb position during rigor development is a significant factor in altering sarcomere length.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , February 1974 , pp. 97 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Goldspink, G. 1964. Increase in length of skeletal muscle during normal growth. Nature, Lond. 204: 1095–1096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldspink, G. 1968. Sarcomere length during post-natal growth of mammalian muscle fibres. J. Cell Set. 3: 539–548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldspink, G. 1970. In The Physiology and Biochemistry of Muscle as a Food (ed. Briskey, E. J., Casseus, R. G. and Marsh, B. B.), Vol. 2, pp. 521–536. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
Griffin, G. E., Williams, P. E. and Goldspink, G. 1971. Region of longitudinal growth in striated muscle fibres. Nature, new Biol., Lond. 232: 28–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hegarty, P. V. J. 1971. Muscle fiber growth and development. Proc. 24th Annual Reciprocal Meat Conference, pp. 319–344. National Live Stock and Meat Board, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hegarty, P. V. J. and Hooper, A. C. 1971. Sarcomere length and fibre diameter distributions in four different mouse skeletal muscles. J. Anat. 110: 249–257.Google ScholarPubMed
Hegarty, P. V. J. and Naudé, R. T. 1970. The accuracy of measurement of individual skeletal muscle fibres separated by a rapid technique. Lab. Pract. 19: 161–164.Google ScholarPubMed
Herring, H. K. 1968. Muscle contraction and tenderness. Proc. 21st Annual Reciprocal Meat Conference, pp. 47–54. National Live Stock and Meat Board, Chicago.Google Scholar
Rowe, R. W. D. 1967. The postnatal growth and development of striated muscle fibres in normal and dystrophic mice. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hull.Google Scholar