Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:11:02.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the method of replicate blood sampling when assessing the mean concentration of insulin, prolactin and growth hormone in the plasma of heifers fed different diets at different frequencies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

W. Little ,
R. D. Harrison ,
Linda A. Williams  and
I. C. Hart
W. Little
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Research Council, Institute for Research on Animal Diseases, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire RG16 0NN
R. D. Harrison
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Research Council, Institute for Research on Animal Diseases, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire RG16 0NN
Linda A. Williams
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Research Council, Institute for Research on Animal Diseases, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire RG16 0NN
I. C. Hart
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
Get access

Abstract

Two groups of six heifers of mean age 284 days and mean body weight 233 kg were offered respectively, a barley-beef (BB) diet and a diet based on dried grass and sugar beet pulp (DG) at a rate calculated to give a live-weight gain of 0·5 kg/day. Three heifers from each group were fed twice daily, and the remaining three were fed through an out-of-parlour concentrate dispenser, and, during the period of blood sampling, hourly. Following a period of adaptation, blood samples were taken hourly during 24 h and the plasma analysed for insulin, prolactin and growth hormone (GH). The experiment was repeated 28 days later using the same heifers offered the same diets except that the twice-daily fed heifers were fed hourly and vice versa.

Comparing the heifers fed the BB diet and those fed the DG diet, insulin in plasma was higher (7·11 v. 3·54 mU/1, P < 0·001) and GH lower (2·48 v. 3·41 uxg/l, P < 0·05) in heifers fed the BB diet. There were no overall significant differences between the two diets for prolactin or between the two frequencies of feeding for all three hormones.

The residual variation among and within heifers was used to estimate the standard error of a treatment mean for different numbers of hourly samples on different numbers of heifers. Little was to be gained by taking in a day more than eight hourly-samples for insulin and more than 12 hourlysamples for GH and prolactin. Precision was most improved by increasing the number of heifers sampled. Feeding the heifers more than twice daily did not improve precision significantly.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , August 1985 , pp. 113 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bassett, J. M. 1974. Early changes in plasma insulin and growth hormone levels after feeding in lambs and adult sheep. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 27: 157–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowie, A. T., Forsyth, I. A. and Hart, I. C. 1980. Hormonal Control of Lactation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, E., Buchanan-Smith, J. G. and MacLeod, G. K. 1975. Postprandial patterns of plasma glucose, insulin and volatile fatty acids in ruminants fed lowand high-roughage diets. J. Anim. Sci. 41: 1474–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, I. C. 1973. Basal levels of prolactin in goat blood measured throughout a 24-h period by a rapid double antibody-solid phase radioimmunoassay. J. Dairy Res. 40: 235–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, I. C. 1983. Endocrine control of nutrient partitioning in lactating ruminants. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 42: 181–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, I. C., Flux, D. S., Andrews, P. and McNeilly, A. S. 1975. Radioimmunoassay for ovine and caprine growth hormone: its application to the measurement of basal circulating levels of growth hormone in the goat. Hormone Metab. Res. 7: 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hove, K. and Blom, A. K. 1973. Plasma insulin and growth hormone in dairy cows; diurnal variation and relation to food intake and plasma sugar and acetoacetate levels. Acta endocr., Copnh. 73: 289–303.Google ScholarPubMed
Koprowski, J. A., Tucker, H. A. and Convey, E. M. 1972. Prolactin and growth hormone circadian periodicity in lactating cows. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 140: 1012–1014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Tech. Bull. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Hart, I. C. and Broster, W. H. 1982. The effect of feeding frequency on energy metabolism in milking cows given low-roughage diets. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals (ed. Ekern, A. and Sundstol, F.), pp. 26–29. Agricultural University of Norway, Aas-NLH.Google Scholar
Tindall, J. S., Knaggs, G. S., Hart, I. C. and Blake, Laura A. 1978. Release of growth hormone in lactating and non-lactating goats in relation to behaviour, stages of sleep, electro-encephalograms, environmental stimuli and levels of prolactin, insulin, glucose and free fatty acids in the circulation. J. Endocr. 76: 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, C. K. and Elliot, J. M. 1973. Effect of roughage restriction on serum insulin in the dairy cow. J. Dairy Sci. 56: 375–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed