Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:51:53.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the comparison of barley-urea, maize gluten and rapeseed meal as supplements to ad libitum winter wheat straw for spring-calving suckler cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. Pullar  and
I. Rigby
D. Pullar
Affiliation:
ADAS High Mowthorpe, Duggleby, Malton YO17 8BP
I. Rigby
Affiliation:
AD AS Headquarters, Oxford Spires Business Park, The Boulevard, Kidlington OX5 1NZ
Get access

Abstract

The effects on animal performance of barley-urea (BU), maize gluten (MG) and rapeseed meal (RSM) offered with ad libitum winter wheat straw, were examined with 138 pregnant Hereford (♂ × Friesian ♀ cows over two winters (1987/88 and 1988/89). In each year, seven young cows and 16 old cows per treatment were offered respectively 3·0 or 1·5 kg fresh weight per head per day, of BU, MG or RSM for 167 days. There were no treatment effects on live weight, condition score or calf birth weight. In terms of animal performance BU, MG and RSM were equally effective.

Keywords

barleymaize glutenrapeseed oil mealstrawsuckler cowsurea
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , August 1993 , pp. 169 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Scottish Agricultural College, UKASTA, British Veterinary Association. 1991. Report of the interdepartmental working party on the protein requirement of ruminants. ADAS, SAC, UKASTA, BVA.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1984. The nutrient requirements of ruminnat livestock. Suppl. no. 1. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Al-Saghier, O. A. S. and Campling, R. C. 1991. Energy and protein supplements to straw-based diets for yearling cattle: effects of straw intake and digestibility. Animal Production 52: 83–92.Google Scholar
Givens, D. I. 1987. The nutritive value of untreated cereal straws in the UK: a short review. Agricultural Progress 62: 26–34.Google Scholar
Leng, R. A., Kempton, T. J. and Nolan, J. V. 1977. Nonprotein nitrogen and bypass proteins in ruminant diets. AMRC Review 33:1–21.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, C. 1989. Straights (raw materials for animal feed compounders and farmers). Chalcombe publications, Marlow.Google Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Scott, N. A. and Somerville, S. H. 1976. Condition scoring of cattle. Revised ed. Bulletin, East of Scotland College of Agriculture, no. 6.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1984. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. 2nd ed. Reference book 433. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1986. Feed composition — UK tables offeed composition and nutritive value for ruminants. Chalcombe publications, Marlow.Google Scholar
Rigby, I., Bastiman, B. and Perks, D. A. 1988. The development of a suckler beef system for arable farms with limited areas of permanent grassland. In Efficient beef production from grass. British Grassland Society occasional symposium no. 22, pp. 79–86.Google Scholar
Shand, W. J., Ørskov, E. R. and Morrice, L. A. F. 1988. Rumen degradation of straw. 5. Botanical fractions and degradability of different varieties of oat and wheat straws. Animal Production 47: 387–392.Google Scholar
Wright, I. A., Russel, A. J. F. and Hunter, E. A. 1986. The use of body condition scoring to ration beef cows in late pregnancy. Animal Production 43: 391–396.Google Scholar