Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:39:20.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on live weight and intake and digestibility of food by draught cattle after supplementation of rice straw with the fodder tree Ficus auriculata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. Anne Pearson
R. Anne Pearson
Affiliation:
Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG
Get access

Abstract

One group of five oxen in the Koshi hills of Nepal ate rice straw plus 4 kg fresh weight per day of the fodder tree Ficus auriculata. Another group of five oxen ate only rice straw. Calculations showed both diets were low in rumen degradable nitrogen (RDN). The animals which ate the tree fodder had a higher dry matter (DM) intake than those eating rice straw alone. Both groups consumed less food and lost weight in weeks when they worked for 5 to 6 h (walking 16 km, climbing 600 mlday) than in weeks when they were not walking. No significant differences in digestibility of food were seen. In the weeks after work the group receiving the tree fodder regained weight, while cattle eating only rice straw remained at a lower weight. Supplementation of rice straw with tree fodder rather than expensive concentrate may be acceptable when feeding working oxen although both diets are likely to be deficient in RDN.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , December 1990 , pp. 635 - 638
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Bamualim, A. and Ffoulkes, D. 1988. Effect of work and level of feed intake on nutritional parameters and body weight change of swamp buffalo cows. DAP Project Bulletin 7: 2–8.Google Scholar
Gatenby, R. M., Mahato, S. N. and Shrestha, N. P. 1989. Animal production in the hills of Nepal: potential for improvement. Technical Paper 112, Pakhribas Agricultural Centre, Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
Hopkins, N. C. G. 1985. Nepal: fodder trees. World Animal Review 56: 18–23.Google Scholar
Lawrence, P. R. 1985. A review of nutrient requirements of draught oxen. In Draught Animal Power for Production (ed. Copland, J. W.), ACIAR Proceedings Series No. 10, pp. 59–68. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Panday, K. 1982. Fodder Trees and Tree Fodder in Nepal. Swiss Development Corporation, Berne and Swiss Federal Institute of Forestry Research, Birmendsdorf, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Pearson, R. A. 1989. A comparison of draught cattle (Bos indicus) and buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) carting loads in hot conditions. Animal Production 49: 355–363.Google Scholar
Pearson, R. A., Lawrence, P. R. and Ghimire, C. 1989. Factors influencing the work done by draught oxen: a study in the eastern hills of Nepal. Animal Production 49: 345–353.Google Scholar
Wanapat, M. and Wachirapakorn, C. 1987. Effect of walking on feed intake and digestibility of rice straw by water buffaloes. Proceedings of the 4th Australasian Association for Animal Production, Animal Science Congress, pp. 332.Google Scholar
Winugroho, M. 1990. The effect of work durations on voluntary feed intake and digestibility, liveweights and physiology of buffaloes fed a grass: rice straw diet. Proceedings of the Congress of the Sixth Federation of Asian Veterinary Association (FAVA), October 16–19, 1988, Denpasar, Bali. In press.Google Scholar