Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T02:25:30.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on intake and digestibility of a fibrous diet self fed to primiparous sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. E. Zoiopoulos ,
P. R. English  and
J. H. Topps
P. E. Zoiopoulos
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
P. R. English
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
J. H. Topps
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
Get access

Abstract

In an attempt to establish an ad libitum, labour saving feeding system 12 Large White primiparous sows were used to investigate the effects on food intake and digestibility of including oat husks in a conventional concentrate diet. The diet contained 500 g ground oat husks per kg diet and was compared with the undiluted concentrate given in restricted amounts during pregnancy (1·8 kg/day) and lactation (5·4 kg/day). The mean daily food intakes for the oat husk diet were 5·50 and 6·29 kg during pregnancy and lactation respectively. The apparent digestibility of the dry matter of the oat husk diet (0·58) was significantly lower than that of the concentrate (0·80), but values for apparent digestibility of nitrogen were similar (0·77 and 0·78, respectively).

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , August 1983 , pp. 153 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1967. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 3, Pigs. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1970. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 11th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Clawson, A. J., Reid, J. T.Shefiy, B. E. and Willman, J. P. 1955. Use of chromium oxide in digestion studies with swine. J. Anim. Sci. 14: 700–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D. J. A., Hardy, B. and Lewis, D. 1972. Nutrient density in pig diets. In Pig Production (ed. Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 243–257. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Elsley, F. H. W. 1973. Some aspects of productivity in the sow. In The Improvement of Sow Productivity (ed. Jones, A. S., Fowler, V. R. and Yeats, J. C. R.). Occ. Publ. Rowett Res. Inst., No. 3. pp. 71–87.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. J. and Speer, V. C. 1975. Threonine requirement of the lactating sow. J. Anim. Sci. 40: 892–899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lodge, G. A. 1962. The nutrition of the lactating sow. In Nutrition of Pigs and Poultry (ed. Morgan, J. T. and Lewis, D.), pp. 224–245. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A. 1969. Nutrition of the sow. In Nutrition of Animals of Agricultural Importance (ed. Cuthbertson, D. P.). pp. 1053–1094. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Low, A. G. 1977. Digestibility at several intestinal sites in pigs. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 36: 189–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmon-Legagneur, E. and Rerat, A. 1962. Nutrition of the sow during pregnancy. In Nutrition of Pigs and Poultry (ed. Morgan, J. T. and Lewis, D.), pp. 207–223. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Van Kempen, G. J. and Grimbergen, A. H. M. 1977. The once or twice daily feeding of lactating sows housed on slatted floors or on straw. Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernahr. Futtermittelk. 38: 158–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zoiopoulos, P. E., English, P. R. and Topps, J. H. 1982. High-fibre diets for ad libitum feeding of sows during lactation. Anim. Prod. 35: 25–33.Google Scholar
Zoiopoulos, P. E., Topps, J. H. and English, P. R. 1978. Digestion by growing pigs of fibrous diets measured over-all and at the terminal ileum. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 37:78A (Abstr.).Google ScholarPubMed