Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:42:15.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Milk production from grass silage diets: effects of high-protein concentrates for lactating heifers and cows on intake, milk production and milk nitrogen fractions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. D. Sutton ,
K. Aston ,
D. E. Beever  and
M. S. Dhanoa
J. D. Sutton
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
K. Aston
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
D. E. Beever
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
M. S. Dhanoa
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
Get access

Abstract

To examine the effects of increasing the crude protein (CP) content of concentrates at either equal concentrate intake (increasing CP intake) or at reducing concentrate intake (equal CP intake), 44 multiparous Holstein-Friesian cows were allocated to one of five treatments for weeks 4 to 18 of lactation. The treatments were 6 kg dry matter (DM) per day of concentrates containing nominally 200, 300 or 400 g CP per kg DM or 9 or 3 kg DM per day of concentrates containing 200 or 600 g CP per kg DM respectively. In addition 23 first-calf cows (heifers) were offered 5 kg DM per day of concentrates containing 200, 300 or 400 g CP per kg DM. All the animals were offered first-cut perennial ryegrass silage ad libitum. Increasing the concentrate CP content at equal intake caused only small and non-significant increases in silage intake by both heifers and cows. It significantly increased yields of milk and milk protein for both groups but whereas the cows responded to both increments of CP, the heifers only responded to the first. The concentrations of total protein, true protein, casein and non-protein nitrogen (NPN) in milk were significantly increased but the concentration of whey protein remained unchanged. Increasing CP concentration while the concentrate ration was reduced enhanced silage intake but had no significant effect on yields of milk or milk solids. The concentrations of total protein, true protein (non-significant), casein and NPN all increased but whey protein was unchanged. Overall the concentrations of casein and NPN were linearly related to the dietary CP concentration. With both concentrate strategies the proportion of true protein in total milk protein decreased and the proportion of NPN increased with increasing dietary CP concentration but the changes, though highly significant, were relatively small. It is concluded that the strategy of reducing the concentrate ration while maintaining concentrate CP intake causes only small reductions in milk solids production but it is dependent for success on supplies of high-quality grass silage to substitute for the concentrates.

Keywords

dairy cowsgrass silageheifersmilk proteinprotein intake
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , April 1996 , pp. 207 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1993. Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. Energy and Protein Requirements of Ruminants. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Aston, K., Sutton, J. D. and Fisher, W. J. 1995. Milk production from grass silage diets: strategies for concentrate allocation.Animal Science 61: 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aston, K., Thomas, C., Daley, S. R. and Sutton, J. D. 1994a. Milk production from grass silage diets: effects of the composition of supplementary concentrates. Animal Production 59: 335–344.Google Scholar
Aston, K., Thomas, C., Daley, S. R., Sutton, J. D. and Dhanoa, M. S. 1994b. Milk production from grass silage diets: effects of silage characteristics and the amount of supplementary concentrate. Animal Production 59: 31–41.Google Scholar
Ciszuk, P., Spömdly, E., Gebregziabher, T. and Oltner, R. 1993. Diurnal variation in urea content of blood, milk and urine in lactating cows and goats. Report 224, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
DePeters, E. J. and Cant, J. P. 1992. Nutritional factors influencing the nitrogen composition of bovine milk: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 2043–2070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DePeters, E. J. and Ferguson, J. D. 1992. Nonprotein nitrogen and protein distribution in the milk of cows. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 3192–3209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, F. J. 1984. The effect of level of concentrate supplementation given with grass silage during the winter on the total lactation performance of autumn-calving cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102: 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenward, M. G. 1987. A method for comparing profiles of repeated measurements. Applied Statistics 36: 296–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, J. A., Beever, D. E., Sutton, J. D., Wray-Cahen, D., Evans, R. T., Humphries, D. J., Backwell, F. R. C., Bequette, B. J. and MacRae, J. C. 1994. The effect of supplementary protein on in vivo metabolism of the mammary gland in lactating dairy cows, Journal of Dairy Science 77: 1816–1827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oltner, R. and Sjaunja, L-O. 1982. Evaluation of a rapid method for the determination of urea in cow's milk. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 23: 39–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roffler, R. E., Satter, L. D., Hardie, A. R. and Tyler, W. J. 1978. Influence of dietary protein concentration on milk production by dairy cattle during early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 61: 1422–1428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowland, S. J. 1938. The precipitation of the proteins in milk. I. Casein. II. Total protein. III. Globulin. IV. Albumin and proteose-protein. journal of Dairy Research 9: 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Aston, K., Beever, D. E. and Fisher, W. J. 1994. Milk production from grass silage diets: the relative importance of the amounts of energy and crude protein in the concentrates. Animal Production 59: 327–334.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. 1980. Conserved forages. In Feeding strategics for dairy cows (ed. Broster, W. H., Johnson, C. L. and Tayler, J. C.), pp. 8.1–8.14. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Aston, K., Tayler, J. C., Daley, S. R. and Osbourn, D. F. 1981. Milk production from silage. 1. The influence of an additive containing formaldehyde and formic acid on the response of lactating heifers and cows to supplementary protein. Animal Production 32: 285–295.Google Scholar
Waite, R., White, J. C. D. and Robertson, A. 1956. Variation in the chemical composition of milk with particular reference to the solids-not-fat. 1. The effect of stage of lactation, season of year and age of cow. journal of Dairy Research 23: 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, B. L., Roberts, D. J. and Hunter, E. A. 1991. Dietary effects of energy and crude protein content on lactation and intake in dairy cattle. Animal Production 52: 594.Google Scholar