Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:15:31.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maize gluten and rapeseed meal as protein supplements to barley or wheat for intensively finished Charolais-cross bulls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. Pullar
D. Pullar
Affiliation:
ADAS, High Mowthorpe, Duggleby, Malton, North Yorkshire YO17 8BP
Get access

Abstract

Four diets, barley/proprietary protein concentrate (B/PC), barley/maize gluten (B/MG), barley/rapeseed meal (B/RSM) and wheat/'rapeseed meal (W/RSM) were formulated to contain 165 g crude protein and 13·0 MJ metabolizable energy per kg dry matter. In experiment 1, all four diets were offered ad libitum to Charolais × Friesian bulls from 187 kg live weight to slaughter at about 488 kg live weight. In experiment 2, the B/PC and B/RSM were offered ad libitum to Charolais × (Hereford × Friesian) bulls from 222 kg live weight to slaughter at about 491 kg live weight. There were no significant differences between treatments in daily live-weight gain, percentage fat and lean in the live animal, slaughter weight or days on experiment in either experiment. In experiment 1, the carcasses from bulls given B/PC were 14 kg heavier than carcasses from bulls given W/RSM (P<0·05), but only 10 and 7 kg heavier than from bulls given B/MG and B/RSM respectively (P<0·05). The killing-out proportion of bulls given B/PC was significantly greater (P<0·05) than bulls given B/RSM. In experiment 2, carcass weights were similar but the killing-out proportion of bulls given B/PC were again greater (P < 0·001). It is concluded that B/MG and B/RSM were as effective as B/PC as finishing diets and that wheat can be successfully substituted for barley, when offered with rapeseed meal.

Keywords

bullscarcass compositioncereal-based dietsprotein supplements
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 49 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Scottish Agricultural College, UKASTA and British Veterinary Association. 1991. Report of the interdepartmental working party on the protein requirement of ruminants. ADAS, SAC, UKASTA and BVA.Google Scholar
Bastiman, B. 1975. The effect of different levels of protein in diets for intensive beef. Experimental Husbandry 29: 54–60.Google Scholar
Blood, D. C. and Radostits, O. M. 1989. Veterinary medicine 7th ed. Baillere and Tindall, London.Google Scholar
DiCostanzo, A., Chester-Jones, H., Plegge, S. D., Peters, T. M. and Meiske, J. C. 1990. Energy value of dry maize gluten feed in starter, growing or finishing steer diets. Animal Production 51: 75–84.Google Scholar
Harvey, P. N. 1975. The use of wheat to replace barley in rations for intensively fed beef. Experimental Husbandry 29: 102–106.Google Scholar
Kay, M., McDearmid, A. and MacLeod, N. A. 1970. Intensive beef production 10: replacement of cereals with chopped straw. Animal Production 12: 261–266.Google Scholar
Keane, M. G. and Drennan, M. J. 1988. Comparison of corn gluten and barley in all concentrate diets and effect of anabolic agents on performance of finishing steers. Irish journal of Agricultural Research 27: 99–104.Google Scholar
Lamming, G. E., Swan, H. and Clarke, R. T. 1966. Studies on the nutrition of ruminants I. Substitution of maize by milled barley straw in a beef fattening diet and its effect on performance and carcass quality. Animal Production 8: 303–312.Google Scholar
Mathison, G. W., Engstrom, D. F. and Macleod, D. D. 1991. Effect of feeding whole and rolled barley to steers in the morning or afternoon in diets containing differing proportions of hay and grain. Animal Production 53: 321–330.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1984. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. 2nd ed. Reference book 433. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1986. Feed composition — UK tables of feed composition and nutritive value for ruminants. Chalcombe publications, Marlow.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M. J. and Baumgardt, B. R. 1965a. Regulation of food intake in ruminants. 1. Pelleted rations varying in energy concentration. Journal of Dairy Science 48: 569–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, M. J. and Baumgardt, B. R. 1965b. Regulation of food intake in ruminants. 2. Rations varying in energy concentration and physical form. Journal of Dairy Science 48:1623–1628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, S. J., Owen, M. G., Page, S. J. and Fisher, A. V. 1990. Comparison of seven ultrasonic techniques for in vivo estimation of beef carcass composition with special reference to performance testing. Animal Production 51: 489–495.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R., Whitelaw, F. G., Aitken, J. N., McDearmid, A. and Charleson, E. B. 1963. Intensive beef production 1. Performance of cattle given complete ground diets. Animal Production 5: 47–52.Google Scholar
Walker, T., Kay, M., Preston, T. R., McDonald, I., MacLeod, N. A. and McDearmid, A. 1968. The performance of beef cattle given diets of barley supplemented with either vegetable protein or non-protein nitrogen. Animal Production 10: 381–391.Google Scholar