Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T12:43:59.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Livestock production in central Mali: environmental factors affecting weight in traditionally managed goats and sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. T. Wilson
R. T. Wilson
Affiliation:
Small Ruminant and Camel Group, International Livestock Centre for Africa, PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Get access

Abstract

A study of the factors affecting weight in traditionally managed goats and sheep in central Mali was undertaken during 1978–84. Sheep were heavier than goats at all ages. Birth weights of goats (2·2 kg) were significantly affected by year and season of birth, parity, type of birth, sex and system (rain-fed millet or irrigated rice). Lamb birth weights (2·9 kg) were affected by all these sources of variation except year. System did not exert a significant influence on kid weights at 30 (4·3 kg), 90 (7·5 kg) or 150 days (10·5 kg) but the random effects of flocks and dams and the fixed effects of season, year, parity, type of birth, sex and the interaction of season × year were all significant at all three ages except for year at 30 days. Lamb weights (5·7, 11·1 and 15·5 kg) were significantly affected at all three ages by all sources of variation except season × year effects at 90 and 150 days. Repeatabilities of lamb weights were higher than of kids, probably due to milk being taken for human consumption from goats. There were few significant effects at post weaning to 730 days except those related to sex. Post-partum weights of goats (26·0 kg) were not affected by system, by the type of parturition nor by the sex of the young but were affected by season and year of parturition and by parity. Ewe post-partum weights (30·6 kg) were affected only by system and parity. Changes in weight over the year, pooled for 7 years, in specific age and sex groups averaged proportionately about 005 above and below the annual mean. Weights of mature animals were about 0·05 lower in 1984 than in 1978. Seasonal and long-term effects on weight are much less marked in small ruminants than in cattle under the same management system in the central Mali environment and the allocation of future research effort should take into consideration the relative advantages of the two types of stock.

Type
Papers
Information
Animal Production , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , October 1987 , pp. 223 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carles, A. J. 1985. Factors affecting the growth of sheep and goats in Africa. In Small Ruminants in African Agriculture (ed. Wilson, R. T. and Bourzat, D.), pp. 34–44. International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Chopra, S. C. and Acharya, R. M. 1971. A note on non-genetic factors affecting body weights of Bikaneri sheep (Magra strain). Animal Production 13: 349–351.Google Scholar
Dass, G. S. and Acharya, R. M. 1970. Growth of Bikaneri sheep. Journal of Animal Science 31: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fall, A., Diop, M., Sandford, J., Gueye, E., Wissoco, Y. J., Durkin, J. and Trail, J. C. M. 1983. Etude sur la productivite du mouton Djallonke au Centre de Recherches Zootechniques de Kolda au Senegal. II. Poids corporels, Productivite des brebis et du troupeau. Revue d'Elevage et de Medecine Veterinaire des Pays Tropicaux 36: 283–289.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1977. Users' guide for LSML76. Mixed model least-squares and maximum likelihood computer program. Ohio State University, Columbus. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Karam, H. A. 1959. Birth, weaning and yearling weights of Rahmani sheep. I. Effects of some environmental factors. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 27: 313–319.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L. 1969. A world dictionary of livestock breeds, types and varieties. 2nd ed. Technical Communication, Commonwealth Bureau of Animal Breeding and Genetics, No. 8. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Sidwell, G. M. and Miller, L. R. 1971. Production in some pure breeds of sheep and their crosses. II. Birth weights and weaning weights of lambs. Journal of Animal Science 32: 1090–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrill, C. E., Sidwell, G. M. and Hazel, L. N. 1948. Effects of some environmental factors on yearling traits of Columbia and Targhee rams. Journal of Animal Science 7: 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, G. 1967. A comparison of body size, fleece weight and maternal performance of five breeds of sheep kept in one environment. Animal Production 9: 177–195.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. and Hayter, S. 1974. Body size and conformation in sheep from birth to maturity as affected by breed, crossbreeding, maternal and other factors. Animal Production 19: 47–65.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. T. 1987a. Productivity of traditionally managed small ruminants in an agro-pastoral system in northern Burkina Faso. Tropical Agriculture 64: 163–169.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. T. 1987b. Livestock production in central Mali: factors influencing growth and live-weight in agro-pastoral cattle. Tropical Animal Health and Production 19: 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. T. and Durkin, J. W. 1983. Livestock production in central Mali: weight at first conception and ages at first and second parturitions in traditionally managed goats and sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100: 625–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. T. and Durkin, J. W. 1987. Livestock production in central Mali: litter sizes, parturition intervals and annual reproductive rates in traditionally managed goats and sheep. Animal Reproduction Science. In press.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. T., Peacock, C. P. and Sayers, A. R. 1982. Livestock production on Masai group ranches. 2. Growth and liveweight in goats and sheep at Elangata Wuas and the factors influencing them. Beitrage zur Tropischen Landwirtschaft and Veterinarmedizin 21: 191–198.Google Scholar