Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:42:27.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lactational oestrus in the sow 4. Variation in the incidence and timing of lactational oestrus in groups of sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. J. Bryant ,
G. Palmer ,
D. J. Petherick  and
P. Rowlinson
M. J. Bryant
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 2AT
G. Palmer
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 2AT
D. J. Petherick
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 2AT
P. Rowlinson
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 2AT
Get access

Abstract

Eighty multiparous Camborough hybrid female pigs (sows) and their litters, on average 15 days post partum, were housed in groups of five in multi-accommodation pens. The sows were fed ad libitum on a proprietary diet containing 160 g crude protein per kg from grouping to 30 days post partum, when they were fed to scale twice daily in individual feeders until weaning at 42 days post partum. One of four Large White male pigs (boars) was introduced to each group on the day following grouping, each boar being run with four groups.

Oestrus occurred in 62 sows, on average 10·2 ± 3·3 days after grouping. The differences between groups in the interval from grouping and boar introduction to the onset of oestrus were statistically significant (P < 0·01). Neither the incidence nor the timing of oestrus could be related to the identity of the boar.

Regression analysis revealed relationships between a number of independent variables and the incidence and timing of lactational oestrus. Sows which gained more live weight from farrowing to weaning and whose litters consumed more creep food were more likely to show lactational oestrus. Sows were slower to show lactational oestrus when they gained little weight from farrowing to weaning, had lower live weights at weaning and gained less weight from the previous weaning, despite eating comparatively more food during grouping. The sows which took longer to show lactational oestrus also had heavier piglets at grouping and more piglets in their litters at weaning. The difficulties arising in the interpretation of these results are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , June 1983 , pp. 453 - 460
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1967. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 3, Pigs. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R. and Mitchell, K. G. 1955. Studies on milk production of Large White pigs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 46: 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, M. J., Rowlinson, P. and Van der steen, H. A. M. 1983. A comparison of the nursing and suckling behaviour of group- and individually-housed sows and their litters. Anim. Prod. 36: 445–451.Google Scholar
Crighton, D. B. 1970. The induction of pregnancy during lactation in the sow: the effects of a treatment imposed at 21 days of lactation. Anim. Prod. 12: 611–617.Google Scholar
Crighton, D. B. and Lamming, G. E. 1969. The lactational anoestrus of the sow: the status of the anterior pituitaryovarian system during lactation and after weaning. J. Endocr. 43: 507–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClintock, Martha K. 1971. Menstrual synchrony and suppression. Nature, Lond. 229: 244–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petchey, A. M. and Jolly, G. M. 1979. Sow service in lactation: an analysis of data from one herd. Anim. Prod. 29: 183–191.Google Scholar
Petherick, D. J., Rowlinson, P. and Bryant, M. J. 1977. Variation in the occurrence of oestrus in lactating sows in response to grouping, boar presence and an elevated feed level. Anim. Prod. 24: 155–156 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Rowlinson, P., Boughton, H. G. and Bryant, M. J. 1975. Mating of sows during lactation: observations from a commercial unit. Anim. Prod. 21: 233–241.Google Scholar
Rowlinson, P. and Bryant, M. J. 1981. Lactational oestrus in the sow. 1. The effect of the interval between farrowing and grouping on the incidence and timing of lactational oestrus in sows. Anim. Prod. 32: 315–323.Google Scholar
Rowlinson, P. and Bryant, M. J. 1982a. Lactational oestrus in the sow. 2. The influence of group-housing, boar presence and feeding level upon the occurrence of oestrus in lactating sows. Anim. Prod. 34: 283–290.Google Scholar
Rowlinson, P. and Bryant, M. J. 1982b. Lactational oestrus in the sow. 3. The influence of feeding level upon the occurrence of a fertile oestrus in lactating sows. Anim. Prod. 35: 49–53.Google Scholar
Russel, M. J., Switz, M. G. and Thompson, K. 1980. Olfactory influences on the human menstrual cycle. Pharmac. Biochem. Behav. 13: 737–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar