Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T12:54:33.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intensive beef production. II. Replacement of cereals with ground straw

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. Kay
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
A. Macdearmid
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
R. Massie
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
Get access

Summary

1. A growth trial was carried out with 21 Friesian steers given diets containing either 0%, 30% or 50% ground straw, and concentrates up to 100%.

2. Steers offered the diet containing 0% straw consumed less dry matter per day than steers on the other two treatments.

3. Rates of live-weight gain were 1·20, 1·04 and 0·87 kg/day for the three treatments respectively, and carcass gains were 690, 550 and 440 g/day.

4. Killing-out percentage dropped and alimentary-tract fill increased as the proportion of straw in the diet increased.

5. The dry-matter digestibility coefficients for the three diets, determined at maximal intake, were 79·1%, 62·3% and 56·6%, respectively.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2. Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Association Of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1965. Official Methods of Analysis. The Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. and Graham, N. Mc. 1956. The effect of the grinding and the cubing process on the utilization of the energy of dried grass. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 47: 207217.Google Scholar
Bowers, H. B., Preston, T. R., McDonald, I., Macleod, N. A. and Philip, Euphemia B. 1965. Intensive beef production. 4. The effect on nitrogen retention of all-concentrate diets containing different levels offish meal. Anim. Prod. 7: 19–25.Google Scholar
Forbes, T. J., Irwin, J. H. D. and Raven, A. M. 1969. The use of coarsely ground barley straw in high concentrate diets for beef cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 73: 347354.Google Scholar
Forbes, T. J., Raven, A. M. and Irwin, J. H. D. 1969. The use of coarsely milled barley straw in finishing diets for young beef cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 73: 365372.Google Scholar
Kay, M., Macdearmid, A. and Macleod, N. A. 1970. Intensive beef production. 10. Replacement of cereals with chopped straw. Anim. Prod. 12: 261266.Google Scholar
Lamming, G. E., Swan, H. and Clarke, R. T. 1966. Studies on the nutrition of ruminants. 1. The substitution of maize by milled barley straw in a beef fattening diet and its effect on performance and carcass quality. Anim. Prod. 8: 303312.Google Scholar
Owen, E., Perry, F. G., Burt, A. W. A. and Pearson, M. C. 1969. Variation in the digestibility of barley straws. Anim. Prod. 11: 272 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Swan, H. and Lamming, G. E. 1967. Studies on the nutrition of ruminants. 2. The effect of level of crude fibre in maize-based rations on the carcass composition of Friesian steers. Anim. Prod. 9: 203208.Google Scholar
Swan, H. 1969. The effect of ground roughage in rations for beef cattle. Feed Forum 4: 111.Google Scholar