Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T18:47:23.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intensive beef production. 8. The effect of chlortetracycline on growth, feed utilisation and incidence of liver abscesses in barley beef cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. F. Wieser
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen
T. R. Preston
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen
A. Macdearmid
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen
A. C. Rowland
Affiliation:
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Edinburgh
Get access

Extract

An experiment was conducted on 13 commercial barley beef units in Scotland, using a total of 301 early-weaned Friesian male calves. On each unit the trial batch of calves was divided into two groups, which were then allocated to a control diet (85% barley + 15% protein supplement) or the same diet supplemented with 20 mg. chlortetracycline per kg. of feed. The experiment was conducted over the live-weight range 115 to 360 kg.

The chlortetracycline significantly (P<0·01) improved live-weight gain ( + 4·9%) and feed utilisation ( + 4·8%). This overall effect was largely due to a high response during the first 12 weeks. From 13 to 28 weeks the chlortetracycline had only a marginal effect, which was not significant. There was no significant difference in the feed intakes of the two groups. There was a significant (P<0·01) negative correlation between the effect of the chlortetracycline on live-weight gain at each unit and the growth rate of the control animals at that unit; the response was greatest on farms with poor hygiene. The animals given chlortetracycline showed a significantly (P<0·05) lower incidence of liver abscesses (11·8%) than the controls (28·2%). Macroscopic examination of the rumens showed that rumenitis is common among intensively fed cattle, but no correlation could be found between incidence of liver abscesses and rumen lesions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, C. R., Reynolds, W. M., Sherman, W. C., & Luther, H. G., 1955. Diethylstilbestrol and oxytetracycline (Terramycin) in combination for growth promotion in feeder cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 14: 1242 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Braude, R., Wallace, H. D., & Cunha, T. J., 1953. The value of antibiotics in the nutrition of swine. A review. Antibiotics Chemother., 3: 271291.Google ScholarPubMed
Breirem, K., 1956. In Proc. 1st int. Conf. Antibiot. Agric. (Publ. no. 397, NAS-NRC, Washington, D.C.), pp. 147149.Google Scholar
Bush, L. J., Allen, R. S., & Jacobson, N. L., 1959. Effect of chlortetracycline on nutrient utilisation by dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 42: 671678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, M. E., Dickinson, C. D., Harrison, G. F., Kon, S. K., Porter, J. W. G., Cummins, S. H., & Cuthbertson, W. F. J., 1952. A mode of action of antibiotics in chick nutrition. J. Sci. Fd Agric., 3: 4348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinda, P. K., 1960. Some effects of chlortetracycline on the nutrition of the early weaned calf. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Edgerly, C. G. M., 1953. Antibiotics for dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 36: 145 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Ellsworth, S. A., Huffmann, C. T., Smith, C. K., & Ralston, N. R., 1953. Effect of feeding antibiotics to dairy calves. I. Aureomycin and Bacitracin feed supplements. Quart. Bull. Mich. Agric. Expt. Sta., 36: 6066.Google Scholar
Everett, J. P., Brown, C. D., Lassiter, C. A., Jacobson, D. R., & Rust, J. W., 1958. Aureomycin as a protein sparing agent and its influence on minimum starter protein level satisfactory for normal growth of dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 42: 14071416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, J. C., & Jensen, R., 1958. The effect of chlortetracycline fed continuously during fattening on the incidence of liver abscesses in beef cattle. Amer. J. vet. Res., 19: 830832.Google ScholarPubMed
Gordon, W. S., 1956. In Proc. 1st int. Conf. Antibiot. Agric. (Pubi. no. 397. NAS-NRC. Washington, D.C.), pp. 153160.Google Scholar
Heinemann, W. W., & Fanelli, H. H., 1963. Some effects of feeding stilbestrol, chlortetracycline and penicillin with alfalfa soilage on steer performance and carcass quality. J. Anim. Sci., 22: 1921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbs, J. W., Conrad, H. R., & Pounden, W. D., 1954. A high roughage system for raising calves based on the early development of rumen function. V. Some effects of feeding aureomycin with different ratios of hay to grain. J. Dairy Sci., 37: 724736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, N. L., Kaffetzakis, J. G., & Hohmeyer, P. G., 1952. The effect of aureomycin feeding on changes in weight and in body measurements of dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 35: 10941100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, R., Flint, J. D., & Griner, L. A., 1954a. Experimental hepatic necrobacillosis in beef cattle. Amer. J. vet. Res., 15: 514.Google ScholarPubMed
Jensen, R.Deane, H. M., Cooper, L. F., Miller, V. A., & Graham, W. R., 1954b. The rumenitis-liver abscess complex in beef cattle. Amer. J. vet. Res., 15: 202216.Google ScholarPubMed
Jensen, R., Connel, W. E., & Deem, W. A., 1954c. Rumenitis and its relation to rate of change of ration and the proportion of concentrate in the ration of cattle. Amer. J. vet. Res., 15: 425428.Google ScholarPubMed
Johansson, K. R., 1956. Mode of action of antibiotics on animal growth. In Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Antibiot. Agric. (Publ. no. 397, NAS-NRC, Washington, D.C.), pp. 127134.Google Scholar
Keith, T. M., 1955. Bovine hepatic abscesses due to spherophorus necrophorus. North Amer. Vet., 36: 911914.Google Scholar
Kolari, D. E., Harvey, A. L., Meiske, J. G., Aunan, W. J., & Hanson, L. E., 1960. Diethylstilbestrol, oxytetracycline, linseed oil meal, soyabean meal and levels of corn silage in cattle fattening rations. J. Anim. Sci., 19: 10411048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassiter, C. A., 1955. Antibiotics as growth stimulants for dairy cattle. A review. J. Dairy Sci., 38: 11021138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, S. P., Wing, J. M., & Dix Arnold, P. T., 1957. Effects of feeding aureomycin to dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 40: 12421249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, T. R., 1962. Antibiotics for the young ruminant. In Antibiotics in Agriculture, Butterworths, London, pp. 214222.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R., 1963. Barley beef production. Vet. Rec., 75: 13991402.Google Scholar
Scott, M. L., 1961. Do theories on mode of action of antibiotics explain their growth promoting effects? Proc. Europ. Symp. Antibiot. Anim. Nutr., Oslo, pp. 1520.Google Scholar
Shermann, W. C., Hale, W. H., Reynolds, W. M., & Luther, H. G., 1959. The effect of tranquilisers, diethylstilbestrol and oxytetracycline alone and in combination on performance of steers. J. Anim. Sci., 18: 198205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. A., 1944. Ulcerative lesions of the bovine rumen and their possible relation to hepatic abscesses. Amer. J. vet. Res., 5: 234243.Google Scholar
Smith, H., Taylor, I. H., & Quenouille, M. H., 1961. The continuous feeding of chlortetracycline to laying fowl. Brit. Poult. Sci., 2: 107131.Google Scholar
Smith, L. D., 1963. Spherophorus necrophorus and liver abscesses in cattle. Bull Off. int. Epizoot., 59: 15171526.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. H., 1957. The mode of action of antibiotics in promoting nimal growth. Vet. Rec., 69: 278288.Google Scholar
Vandersall, J. H., Hibbs, J. W., & Conrad, H. R., 1956. The influence of chlortetracy-cline on whole blood, plasma and corpuscles glucose relationships in calves fed high roughage pellets. J. Dairy Sci., 39: 929 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
White-Stevens, R. H., 1957. Antibiotics as dietary supplements for poultry. Vet. Rec., 69: 217228.Google Scholar
Wieser, M. F., 1965. The use of antibiotics in beef production. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar