Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:45:26.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of nutrition in early life on growth and development of the pig 3. Effects of energy intake prior and subsequent to 10 kg on growth and development to 30 kg live weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. G. Campbell
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
A. C. Dunkin
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
Get access

Abstract

1. Forty-two piglets were used to study the effects of a low, medium or high level of energy intake (1·0, 1·4 and 1·9 MJ gross energy per kg W0·75 per day respectively) from 1·8 to 10 kg live weight and a low or high level of energy intake (1·4 and 1·8 MJ digestible energy per kg W075 per day respectively) subsequent to 10 kg live weight on growth performance, body composition and the cellularity of muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue to 30 kg live weight. During both live-weight periods all pigs received the same daily intake of crude protein.

2. Raising energy intake in the period prior to 10 kg live weight increased (P < 0·-05) growth rate, body fat content and fat cell size but reduced food conversion efficiency, body protein and water (P < 0·05) and muscle deoxyribonucleic acid. These effects on body composition and muscle deoxyribonucleic acid at 10 kg live weight were still evident at 30 kg live weight.

3. Subsequent to 10 kg live weight, pigs previously given the lowest energy intake deposited protein and fat at a faster rate and exhibited more rapid and efficient growth (P < 0·05) than pigs previously given the high energy intake.

4. At 30 kg live weight pigs given the two higher levels of energy intake before 10 kg live weight contained less deoxyribonucleic acid (P < 0·05) in subcutaneous adipose tissue and had larger (P < 0·05) fat cells than those given the lowest energy intake before 10 kg live weight.

5. The effects of energy intake subsequent to 10 kg live weight on growth performance, body composition and the cellularity of muscle and adipose tissue were qualitatively the same as those for the period 1·8 to 10 kg live weight.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1967. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 3, Pigs. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G. and Biden, R. S. 1978. The effect of protein nutrition between 5–5 and 20 kg live weight on the subsequent performance and carcass quality of pigs. Anim. Prod. 27: 223228.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G. and Dunkin, A. C. 1980. Influence of early nutrition on the development of body fat and cellularity of adipose tissue in the growing pig. Proc. Nutr. Soc. Aust. 5: 156 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G. and Dunkin, A. C. 1982. The effects of birth weight and level of feeding in early life on growth and development of muscle and adipose tissue in the young pig. Arum. Prod. 35: 185192.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G. and Dunkin, A. C. 1983a. The influence of nutrition in early life on growth and development of the pig. 1. Effects of protein nutrition prior and subsequent to 6–5 kg on growth and development to 45 kg. Anim. Prod. 36: 415423.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G. and Dunkin, A. C. 1983b. The influence of nutrition in early life on growth and development of the pig. 2. Effects of rearing method and feeding level on growth and development to 75 kg. Anim. Prod. 36: 425434.Google Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H. 1963. Studies of growth and development in the young pig. Part II. A comparison of the performance to 200 lb of pigs reared along different growth curves to 56 days of age. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 61: 243251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, R. and McCracken, K. J. 1980. Effect of confinement in a respiration chamber and changes in temperature and plane of nutrition on heat production of 25 kg pigs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 95: 123133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, R. L. and Allen, C. E. 1977. The cellularity of porcine adipose tissue. J. Lipid Res. 18: 275281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucas, I. A. M., Calder, A. F. C. and Smith, H. 1959. The early weaning of pigs. VI. The effects of early weaning and of various growth curves before 50 lb live weight upon subsequent performance and carcass quality. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 53: 136144.Google Scholar
Martin, R. F., Donohue, Diana C. and Finch, L. R. 1972. New analytical procedure for the estimation of DN A with pnitrophenylhydrazine. Analyt. Biochem. 47: 562574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. G., Ezekwe, M., Herbein, J. H., Sherritt, G. W., Gobble, J. L. and Ziegler, J. H. 1974. Effects of neonatal nutritional experiences on growth and development of the pig. J. Anim. Sci. 39: 521526.Google Scholar
Nielsen, H. E. 1964. Effects in bacon pigs of differing levels of nutrition to 20 kg body weight. Anim. Prod. 6: 301308.Google Scholar
Smith, V., Sjostrom, L. and Bjorntorp, P. 1972. Comparison of two methods for determining human adipose cell size. J. Lipid Res. 13: 822824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, I. H. 1976. Nutrition of the young pig in relation to body composition. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Melb.Google Scholar
Wyllie, D., Speer, V. C., Ewan, R. C. and Hays, V. W. 1969. Effect of starter protein level on performance and body composition of pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 29: 433438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, L. G. and Sharma, V. D. 1973. Influence of energy intake by the neonatal pig on subsequent growth and development. J. Anim. Sci. 36: 183187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, D. R. and Khajarern, S. 1973. Starter protein nutrition and compensatory responses in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 36: 189194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar