Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:11:04.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ileal digestibility of amino acids in pigs given a barley-based diet with increasing inclusion of lucerne leaf meal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. Reverter  and
J. E. Lindberg
M. Reverter
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7024, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
J. E. Lindberg
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7024, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Ileal digestibility of amino acids in barley-based diets with increasing inclusion of lucerne leaf meal (LLM; 0, 50, 100 and 200 g/kg) was studied in a change-over experiment with post-valve T-caecum cannulated growing pigs. The apparent Heal digestibility of crude protein, as well as of most of the essential (EAA) and non-essential amino acids (NEAA) was not significantly affected by the dietary inclusion of LLM. The exceptions were cystine, methionine, phenylalanine, glutamic acid and serine, all of which showed a significant (P < 0·05) reduction in apparent Heal digestibility with increasing inclusion of LLM. In contrast, the calculated true Heal digestibility of all EAA (with the exception of arginine and lysine) and the NEAA glutamic acid and serine were significantly (P < 0·05) reduced with the inclusion of LLM. Associated with an increased crude protein intake, there was a significant (P < 0·05) increase in the amount of absorbed EAA when the proportion of LLM was increased in the diet. With increasing proportion of fibre in the diet, there was a significant (P < 0·05) increase in the Heal flow of glucosamine.

It can be concluded from the present data that the inclusion of LLM in a barley-based diet for growing pigs will result in an improvement in the absorbed amino-acid profile due to a significant increase in the absorption of all of the EAA.

Keywords

amino acidsdigestibilityfibreglucosaminepigs
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , August 1998 , pp. 131 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergner, H. 1982. Fiber and nitrogen excretion. In Physiology digestive chez le pore. Jouy-en-Josas. Les Colloques de l'INRA, vol. 12, pp. 237–240.Google Scholar
Bergner, H., Simon, O. and Zimmer, M. 1975. Einfluβ des Gehaltes nativer Rohfaser in Diaeten von Ratten auf die Aminosäurenresoption. Archiv für Tierernährung 25:95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, R. 1979. A handbook of decomposition methods in analytical chemistry. International Textbook Company, London.Google Scholar
Boisen, S. and Moughan, P. J. 1996. Dietary influences on endogenous ileal protein and amino acid loss in the pig. A review. Acta Agriculture Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 46:154–164.Google Scholar
Borg Jensen, B. and Jørgensen, H. 1994. Effect of dietary fiber on microbial activity and microbial gas production in various regions of the gastrointestinal tract of pigs. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 60:1897–1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, W. N. and Cole, D. J. A. 1994. The living gut. Context Publications, 117 Carrycastle Road, Dungannon, Co Tyrone, N. Ireland, BT70 1LT.Google Scholar
Gerloff, E. D., Lima, I. H. and Stahmann, M. A. 1965. Amino acid composition of leaf protein concentrates. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 13:139–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. H. G., Bayley, H. S. and Leadbeater, P. A. 1974. Digestion of protein in small and large intestine of the pig. British Journal of Nutrition 32: 479–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Just, A. 1982. The influence of crude fibre from cereals on the net energy value of diets for growth in pigs. Livestock Production Science 9: 569–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kass, M. L., Van Soest, P. J., Pond, W. G., Lewis, B. and McDowell, R. E. 1980. Utilisation of dietary fibre from alfalfa by growing swine. I. Apparent digestibility of diet components in specific segments of the gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Animal Science 50:175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuan, K. K., Stanogias, G. and Dunkin, A. C. 1983. The effect of proportion of cell-wall material from lucerne leaf meal on apparent digestibility, rate of passage and gut characteristics in pigs. Animal Production 36:201–209.Google Scholar
Langlois, A., Corring, T. and Février, C. 1987. Effects of wheat bran on exocrine pancreas secretion in the pig. Reproduction, Nutrition, Dévelopement 27:929–939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laplace, J. P., Darcy-Vrillon, B., Perez, J. M., Henry, Y., Giger, S. and Sauvant, D. 1989. Associative effects between two fibre sources on ileal and overall digestibilities of amino acids, energy and cell-wall components in growing pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 61: 75–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leeuwen, P., Kleef, D. J. van, Kempen, G. J. M. van, Huisman, J. and Verstegen, M. W. A. 1991. The post valve T-caecum cannulation technique in pigs applicated to determine the digestibility of amino acids in maize, groundnut and sunflower meal. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 65:183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, J. E. 1997. A comparison of the total tract digestibility in intact and PVTC-cannulated pigs. Proceedings of the seventh international symposium on digestive physiology in pigs, Saint Malo, 26-28 May 1997 (ed. Laplace, J. C., Fevrier, C. and Barbeau, A.), pp. 404–407. EAAP-publication no. 88, Saint Malo, France.Google Scholar
Lindberg, J. E. and Cortova, Z. 1995. The effect of increasing inclusion of lucerne leaf meal in a barley-based diet on the partition of digestion and on nutrient utilisation in pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 56:11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, J. E., Cortova, Z. and Thomke, S. 1995. The nutritive value of lucerne leaf meal for pigs based on digestibility and nitrogen utilisation. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 45:245–251.Google Scholar
Low, A. G. 1989. Secretory response of the pig gut to non-starch polysaccharides. Animal Feed Science and Technology 23: 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, A. G. 1993. Role of dietary fibre in pig diets. In Recent developments in pig nutrition 2 (ed. Cole, D. J. A., Haresign, W. and Garnsworthy, P. C.), pp. 137–162. Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
Madsen, A., Mortensen, H. P. and Hall, D. D. 1987. Protein og aminosyrer til slagtesvin. 627 beretning fra Statens Husdyrbrugsforsøg, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Malmlöf, K., Hellberg, S., Grajewski, J. and Cortova, Z. 1990. Lucern som svinfoder. 2. Näringsvardet av torkade och ensilerade lucernblad för växande svin. Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet (SLU) Rapport 196. Uppsala:SLU.Google Scholar
Mariscal-Landín, G., Sève, B., Colléaux, Y. and Lebreton, Y. 1995. Endogenous amino nitrogen collected from pigs with end-to-end ileorectal anastomosis is affected by the method of estimation and altered by dietary fibre. Journal of Nutrition 125:136–146.Google Scholar
Mason, V. C., Just, A. and Bech-Andersen, S. 1976. Bacterial activity in the hindgut of pigs. 2. Its influence on the apparent digestibility of nitrogen and amino acids. Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie Tierernährung und Futtermittelkunde 36:310–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, S. 1963. On the determination of cystine as cysteic acid. Journal of Biological Chemistry 238:235–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordkvist, E. and Åman, P. 1986. Changes during growth in anatomical and chemical composition and in vitro degradability of lucerne. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 37:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rérat, A. 1991. Carbohydrate interactions on protein and amino acid digestibility and absorption and metabolic consequences in the pig. Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on protein metabolism and nutrition, Herning, 9-14 June 1991 (ed. Eggum, B.O., Boisen, S., Børsting, C., Danfœr, A. and Hvelplund, T.), pp. 37–53. EAAP-publication no. 59, Research Center Foulum, Herning, Denmark.Google Scholar
Sauer, W. C., Mosenthin, R., Ahrens, F. and Hartog, L. A. den. 1991. The effect of source of fiber on ileal and fecal amino acid digestibility and bacterial nitrogen excretion in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 69:4070–4077.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauer, W. C. and Ozimek, L. 1986. Digestibility of amino acids in swine: results and their practical applications. A review. Livestock Production Science 15:367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, W. C., Stothers, S. C. and Philips, G. D. 1977. Apparent availabilities of amino acids in corn, wheat and barley for growing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 57: 585–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, N., Mokhtar, A. T., Raymond, R. M. and Pellett, P. L. 1982. Effect of dietary fibre components on fecal nitrogen excretion and protein utilisation in growing rats. Journal of Nutrition 112:658–668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, D. 1964. Chemical composition of herbage with advance in maturity of alfalfa, medium red clover, ladino clover and birdsfoot trefoil. University of Wisconsin, Experimental Station, research report no. 16.Google Scholar
Spackman, D. H., Stein, W. H. and Moore, S. 1958. Automatic recording apparatus for use in chromatography of amino acids. Analytical Chemistry 30:1190–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanogias, G. and Pearce, G. R. 1985. The digestion of fibre by pigs. 1. The effects of amount and type of fibre on apparent digestibility, nitrogen balance and rate of passage. British Journal of Nutrition 53: 513–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1988. SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.03 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Taverner, M. R., Hume, I. D. and Farrell, D. J. 1981a. Availability to pigs of amino acids in cereal grains. 1. Endogenous levels of amino acids in ileal digesta and faeces of pigs given cereal diets. British Journal of Nutrition 46: 149–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taverner, M. R., Hume, I. D. and Farrell, D. J. 1981b. Availability to pigs of amino acids in cereal grains. 2. Apparent and true ileal availability. British Journal of Nutrition 46:159–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, T. C. and Fuller, M. F. 1989. The optimum dietary amino acid pattern for growing pigs. 1. Experiments by amino acid deletion. British Journal of Nutrition 62: 77–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiesemiiller, W. and Poppe, S. 1990. Lucerne silage as a feedstuff for sows. World Review of Animal Production XXV: 47–53.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. F. and Tilley, J. M. A. 1965. Amino acid composition of lucerne and grass preparations. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 16:173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wünsche, J., Herrmann, U., Meinl, M., Hennig, U., Kreienbring, F. and Zwierz, P. 1987. Einfluβ exogener Faktoren auf die präzäkale Nährstoff- und Aminosäurenresorption, ermittelt Zerkleinerungsgrades von Getreide. Archives of Animal Nutrition 37: 745–764.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, T., Buraczewska, L. and Zebrowska, H. 1984. Apparent digestibility of nitrogen and amino acids of cereal grains in pigs. Proceedings of the VI international symposium on amino acids, Warszawa, pp. 128–132.Google Scholar