Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:02:52.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth of bovine tissues 3. Genetic influences on patterns of fat growth and distribution in young bulls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. T. Berg ,
B. B. Andersen  and
T. Liboriussen
R. T. Berg
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Science, Rolighedsvej 25, 1958 Copenhagen V, Denmark
B. B. Andersen
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Science, Rolighedsvej 25, 1958 Copenhagen V, Denmark
T. Liboriussen
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Science, Rolighedsvej 25, 1958 Copenhagen V, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

Fat growth and distribution were studied by jointing and complete tissue separation of carcasses from 277 young bull progeny of eight sire breeds and two dam breeds, serially slaughtered at 300 kg live weight, 12 and 15 months of age. Growth impetus for fat in each joint was established from the allometric equation (Y = aXb). Differential growth of fat in different joints resulted in marked differences in percentage of fat in various joints as fattening progressed. Growth coefficients, b, for fat in each joint were homogeneous among breed groups, indicating similar fat development patterns over the weight range studied. Growth impetus for fat was lowest in the distal limbs and in the proximal hind limb. Fat growth in the proximal fore limb was proportional to total fat. Along the dorsal line, low impetus was found in neck and rump regions, increasing to a high impetus in the mid-back region. Ventrally the fat of the flank showed the highest growth impetus of all regions with fat in the brisket and flat ribs also showing an increasing proportion with increases in total fat.

Small but significant differences among sire breeds were found for the amount of fat in each joint at a standard amount of total fat in the carcass. Differences found among sire breeds in fat distribution were not associated with differences in maturity type.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , August 1978 , pp. 63 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, C. E. 1976. Cellularity of adipose tissue in meat animals. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 35: 2302–2307.Google ScholarPubMed
Berg, R. T., Andersen, B. B. and Liboriussen, T. 1978a. Growth of bovine tissues. 1. Genetic influences on growth patterns of muscle, fat and bone in young bulls. Anim. Prod. 26: 245–258.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T., Andersen, B. B. and Liboriussen, T. 1978b. Growth of bovine tissues. 2. Genetic influences on muscle growth and distribution in young bulls. Anim. Prod. 27: 51–61.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T. and Butterfield, R. M. 1976. New Concepts of Cattle Growth. University of Sydney Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Callow, E. H. 1948. Comparative studies of meat. II. The changes in the carcass during growth and fattening, and their relation to the chemical composition of the fatty and muscular tissues. J. agric. Sci., Comb. 38: 174–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, E.H. 1961. Comparative studies of meat. VII. A comparison between Hereford, Dairy Shorthorn and Friesian steers on four levels of nutrition. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 56: 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, D. D. and Johnson, E. R. 1976. Breed differences in amount and distribution of bovine carcass dissectible fat. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 332–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harte, F. J. and Conniffe, D. 1967. Studies on cattle of varying growth potential for beef production. II. Carcass composition and distribution of ‘lean meat’, fat and bone. Ir. J. agric. Res. 6: 153–170.Google Scholar
Hood, R. L. and Allen, C. E. 1973. Cellularity of bovine adipose tissue. J. Lipid Res. 14: 605–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempster, A. J., Avis, P. R. D. and Smith, R. J. 1976. Fat distribution in steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses. 2. Distribution between joints. Anim. Prod. 23: 223–232.Google Scholar
Ledger, H. P. 1959. A possible explanation for part of the difference in heat tolerance exhibited by Bos taurus and Bos indicus beef cattle. Nature, Lond. 184: 1405–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. and Tulloh, N. M. 1968. Developmental growth and body weight loss of cattle. II. Dissected components of the commercially dressed and jointed carcass. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19: 477–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, T. G., Lang, C. P. and Tulloh, N. M. 1976. A comparison of body composition and tissue distribution of Friesian and Angus steers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 87: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar