Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:13:47.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth, hormonal and metabolic response of post-pubertal entire male cattle to trenbolone acetate and hexoestrol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

H. Galbraith
H. Galbraith
Affiliation:
North of Scotland College of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen, AB9 1UD
Get access

Abstract

The response of post-pubertal entire male cattle (bulls) to implantation with trenbolone acetate and hexoestrol was studied in two experiments. In experiment 1, eight British Friesian bulls, weighing approximately 359 kg at the beginning of a 90-day experiment, were either sham-implanted or implanted with 45 mg hexoestrol, followed 21 days later with a further implantation of 300 mg trenbolone acetate. In experiment 2, 16 bulls (14 British Friesian and two Simmental < ♂ × (Hereford < 5 × Friesian ♀), weighing approximately 349 kg, were similarly untreated or implanted with 30 mg hexoestrol and 300 mg trenbolone acetate. Treatment with hexoestrol gave a small and non-significant increase in live-weight gain in both experiments. However, live-weight gain and efficiency of conversion of food into live-weight gain were significantly improved in both studies following implantation with trenbolone acetate (P < 0·05). Treated bulls had heavier carcasses and greater mean values for estimated carcass gain (P < 005 in experiment 2). Comparison of mean values for blood metabolites indicated significant differences in concentrations of plasma glucose, free fatty acids and cortisol, and serum total protein, growth hormone, insulin and prolactin. Mean values were significantly lower in treated animals for serum albumin in experiment 2 (P < 001) and for plasma urea in both experiments (P < 0·001; P < 0·05). Treatment with hexoestrol resulted in lower mean concentrations of plasma androgens. These were further reduced following treatment with trenbolone acetate (P < 0·01). The results suggest that the combination of trenbolone acetate plus hexoestrol may improve growth performance, by altering protein metabolism, in post-pubertal entire male cattle. The combination of trenbolone acetate plus hexoestrol appears to have more potent anabolic activity than the endogenous hormones of these animals.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , October 1982 , pp. 269 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, F. H. and Arthaud, V. H. 1972. Use of hormones or hormone active agents in production of slaughter bulls. J. Anim. Sci. 35: 752–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesworth, J. M. 1977. Radioimmunoassays of ovine LH and ovine prolactin using polymerized second antisera. Analyl. Biochem. 80: 31–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, S. L., Ohlson, D. L., Klindt, J. and Anfinson, M. S. 1978. Episodic patterns of prolactin and thyrotropin secretion in rams and wethers: influence of testosterone and diethylstilbestrol. J. Anim. Sci. 46: 1724–1729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, I. A. 1977. The action of anabolic steroids on nitrogen metabolism and the endocrine system in ruminants. Ph.D.Thesis, Univ. Reading.Google Scholar
Edwards, I. E., Galbraith, H. and Carswell, A. J. P. 1980. Th e effect o f castration on th e response of intensively-fed cattle to dietary nitrogen level. Anim. Prod. 30: 492 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Galbraith, H. 1979a. Growth, metabolic and hormonal response in blood of British Friesian entire male cattle treated with trenbolone acetate and hexoestrol. Anim. Prod. 28: 417 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Galbraith, H. 1979b. Effect of Zeranol implantation on the growth and blood metabolites and hormones of beef heifers. Anim. Prod. 28: 417–418 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Galbraith, H. 1980a. The effect of trenbolone acetate on growth, blood hormones and metabolites, and nitrogen balance of beef heifers. Anim. Prod. 30: 389–394.Google Scholar
Galbraith, H. 1980b. Effects of trenbolone acetate on growth, blood metabolites and hormones of cull beef cows. Vet. Rec. 107: 559–560.Google ScholarPubMed
Galbraith, H. and Chesworth, J. M. 1977. A doubl e antibody solid phase method for the radioimmunoassay of bovine growth hormone. Lab. Pract. 26: 471–472.Google Scholar
Galbraith, H. and Dempster, D. G. 1979. Effect of hexoestrol on the response of finishing steers to treatment with trenbolone acetate. Vet. Rec. 105: 283–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galbraith, H., Dempster, D. G. and Miller, T. B. 1978. A note on the effect of castration on the growth performance and concentrations of some blood metabolites and hormones in British Friesian male cattle. Anim. Prod. 26: 339–342.Google Scholar
Galbraith, H. and Topps, J. H. 1981. Effect of hormones on the growth and body composition of animals. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. Ser. B 51: 521–540.Google Scholar
Galbraith, H., Topps, J. H., Coelho, J. F. S. and Yasin, A. R. M. 1980. Studies on the effect of hormonal anabolic compounds on protein metabolism and carcase deposition in sheep. In Proc. 3rd Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. Symp. Protein Metab. Nutr. (ed. Oslage, H. J. and Rohr, K.), pp. 509–514.Google Scholar
Galbraith, H. and Watson, Helen B. 1978. Performance, blood and carcase characteristics of finishing steers treated with trenbolone acetate and hexoestrol. Vet. Rec. 103: 28–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gortsema, S. R., Jacobs, J. A., Sasser, R. G., Gregory, T. L. and Bull, R. C. 1974. Effects of endogenous testosterone on production and carcass traits in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 39: 680–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandadam, J. A., Scheid, J. P., Jobard, A., Dreux, H. and Boisson, J. M. 1975. Results obtained with trenbolone acetateR in conjunction with estradiol 17β in veal calves, feedlot bulls, lambs and pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 41: 969–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitzman, R. J. 1976. The effectiveness of anabolic agents in increasing rate of growth in farm animals; report on experiments in cattle. In Anabolic Agents in Animal Production, EQS Suppl. Vol. V (ed. Coulston, F. and Korte, F.), pp. 89–98. Thieme, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Heitzman, R. J. 1981. Mode of action of anabolic agents. In Hormones and Metabolism in Ruminants (ed. Forbes, J. M. and Lomax, M. A.), pp. 129–139. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Heitzman, R. J., Chan, K. H. and Hart, I. C. 1977. Liveweight gains, blood levels of metabolites, proteins and hormones following implantation of anabolic agents in steers. Br. vet. J. 133: 62–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hristic, V., Knezevic, J., Cuperlowic, M. and Milosevic, M. 1980. The effect of subcutaneous implantation of Revalor on performance and some physiological parameters in bulls. In Steroids in Animal Production (ed. Jasiorowski, H., pp. 179–186. Roussel-Uclaf/Warsaw Agricultural University, Warsaw.Google Scholar
Johke, T. 1970. Factors affecting plasma prolactin levels in the goat and cow as determined by radioimmunoassay. Endocr.jap. 17: 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, N. A., MacDearmid, A. and White, F. 1975. The effect of anabolic steroids and partial castration on the performance of beef cattle. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Ser.) 4: 98 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Neumann, F. 1976. Pharmacological and endocrinological studies on anabolic agents. In Anabolic Agents in Animal Production, EQS Suppl. Vol. V (ed. Coulston, F. and Korte, F.), pp. 253–264. Thieme, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Osmond, T. J., Carr, W. R., Hinks, C. J. M., Land, R. B. and Hill, W. G. 1981. Physiological attributes as possible selection criteria for milk production. 2. Plasma insulin, tri-iodothyronine and thyroxine in bulls. Anim. Prod. 32: 159–163.Google Scholar
Rawlings, N. C., Hafs, H. D. and Swanson, L. V. 1972. Testicular and blood plasma androgens in Holstein bulls from birth through puberty. J. Anim. Sci. 34: 435–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roche, J. F. 1980. The use of growth promoters in beef cattle. In The Use, Residues and Toxicology of Growth Promoters, pp. 1–12. An Foras Taluntais, Dublin.Google Scholar
Secchiari, P., Martorana, F., Pellegrini, S. and Luisi, M. 1976. Variation of plasma testosterone in developing Friesian bulls. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 405–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Signoret, J. P. 1976. Influence des agents anaboliques sur les comportements. In Anabolic Agents in Animal Production, EQS Suppl. Vol. V (ed. Coulston, F. and Korte, F.), pp. 143–150. Thieme, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Snochowski, M., Lundstrom, K., Dahlberg, E., Petersson, H. and Edqvist, L.-E. 1981. Androgen and glucocorticoid receptors in porcine skeletal muscle. J. Anim. Sci. 53: 80–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sykes, A. R. 1978. An assessment of th e value of plasma urea nitrogen and albumin concentrations as monitors of the protein status of sheep. In The Use of Blood Metabolites in Animal Production, Occ. Publ. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod., No. 1, pp. 143–154.Google Scholar
Trenkle, A. 1976. The anabolic effect of estrogens on nitrogen metabolism of growing and finishing cattle and sheep. In Anabolic Agents in Animal Production, EQS Suppl. Vol. V (ed. Coulston, F. and Korte, F.), pp. 79–88. Thieme, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Trenkle, A. and Topel, D. G. 1978. Relationships of some endocrine measurements to growth and carcass composition of cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 46: 1604–1609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der wal, P. 1976. General aspects of the effectiveness of anabolic agents in increasing protein production in farm animals, in particular bull calves. In Anabolic Agents in Animal Production, EQS Suppl. Vol. V (ed. Coulston, F. and Korte, F.), pp. 60–78. Thieme, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Van der wal, P., Berende, P. L. M. and Sprietsma, J. E. 1975. Effect of anabolic agents on performance of calves. J. Anim. Sci. 41: 978–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. B., Vetter, R. L., Burroughs, W. and Topel, D. G. 1975. Dairy beef production as influenced by sex, protein level and diethylstilbestrol. J. Anim. Sci. 41: 1532–1541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar