Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:15:39.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth and estimated heat balance of pigs raised under different housing conditions during summer in southern australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

B. A. Stone
Affiliation:
Animal Industry Division‡, Northfield Pig Research Unit, Department of Agriculture, Box 1671, GPO, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia
P. A. Heap
Affiliation:
Animal Industry Division‡, Northfield Pig Research Unit, Department of Agriculture, Box 1671, GPO, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia
Get access

Abstract

1. An experiment was carried out to describe growth rate, efficiency and thermal balance of pigs accommodated in three different housing conditions during summer in southern Australia.

2. Housed pigs grew at a similar rate to those in an outside pen with a wallow and shelter (418g/day compared with 404g/day respectively; P > 0·05), and both groups utilized food with similar efficiency (food conversion ratios of 3·07 and 3·14 respectively; P > 005). A group accommodated in an outside pen with a wallow but no shelter grew at a significantly slower rate (347g/day; Z <001) with a lower efficiency of food conversion (3·35; P < 005) than either of the other two groups. At slaughter, pigs housed outside without shelter showed a significantly higher dressing proportion (0·749; P < 005) and had less backfat (11·6mm; P < 0·05) than the inside group (0·723 and 13·4mm respectively).

3. Estimated heat storages at 12.00 h of pigs housed inside and outside without shelter were respectively, and approximately, 50 and 18·5 × greater than in those pigs housed outside with shelter.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brody, S. 1945. Bioenergetics and Growth: with Special Reference to the Efficiency Complex in Domestic Animals, Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. M. and Clark, J. J. 1979. Models of heat production and critical temperature for growing pigs. Anim. Prod. 28: 353369.Google Scholar
Close, W. H. and Mount, L. E. 1978. The effects of plane of nutrition and environmental temperature on the energy metabolism of the growing pig. 1. Heat loss and critical temperature. Br. J. Nutr. 40: 413421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heitman, H. Jr and Hughes, E. H. 1949. The effects of air temperature and relative humidity on the physiological well being of swine, J. Anim. Sci. 8: 171181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitman, H. JrKelly, C. F. and Bond, T. E. 1958. Ambient air temperature and weight gain in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 17: 6267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, D. L. 1965. Evaporative cooling in the pig. Nature, Land. 207: 415416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monteith, J. L. 1973. Principles of Environmental Physics. Arnold, London.Google Scholar
Morrison, S. R., Bond, T. E. and Heitman, H. 1967. Skin and lung moisture loss from swine. Trans. Am. Soc. agric. Engrs 10: 691696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, S. R., Heitman, H. Jr and Givens, R. L. 1975. Effect of diurnal air temperature cycles on growth and food conversion in pigs. Anim. Prod. 20: 287291.Google Scholar
Mount, L. E. 1968. The Climatic Physiology of the Pig. Arnold, London.Google Scholar
Mount, L. E. 1977. The use of heat transfer coefficients in estimating sensible heat loss from the pig. Anim. Prod. 25: 271279.Google Scholar
Mount, L. E. 1979. Adaptation to Thermal Environment: Man and his Productive Animals. Arnold, London.Google Scholar
NOBLE, I. R. 1975. Computer simulations of sheep grazing in the arid zone, Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Adelaide.Google Scholar
Porter, W. P. and Gates, D. M. 1969. Thermodynamic equilibria of animals with environment. Ecol. Monogr. 39: 227244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. V. 1964. Animal housing and meteorology. III. A quantiative relationship between environment, comfort and animal productivity. Agric. Meteorol. 1: 249270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, B. A. 1980. Studies on the effects of elevated environmental temperature on fertility of the boar. M. Agric. Sc. Thesis, Univ. Adelaide.Google Scholar