Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:11:33.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ground and pelleted straw and hay for fattening Israeli-Friesian male calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. Levy
Affiliation:
The Volcani Institute of Agricultural Research, Bet Dagan, Israel
S. Amir
Affiliation:
The Volcani Institute of Agricultural Research, Bet Dagan, Israel
Z. Holzer
Affiliation:
The Volcani Institute of Agricultural Research, Bet Dagan, Israel
H. Neumark
Affiliation:
The Volcani Institute of Agricultural Research, Bet Dagan, Israel
Get access

Summary

The performance of Israeli-Friesian male calves on six rations, including two levels (15% and 30%) of ground wheat straw and oatvetch hay in pelleted mixtures, and the same two levels of ground straw in non-pelleted mixtures, was examined.

Daily live-weight and carcass gain were higher on the lower level of both roughages. The differences in performance on hay and straw were insignificant. Feed intake was higher on the 15% level of both roughages when pelleted but the energy conversion ratio was higher on pelleted rations of both levels of straw.

The dressing percentage was higher for animals on pelleted rations. There was no significant difference in percentage fat trim, percentage bone or percentage saleable meat in the carcasses. There was 20% more kidney, pelvic and cod fat on the lower level of roughage.

The digestibility of organic matter was higher on rations with the lower level of roughage, and on the pelleted rations compared with the non-pelleted at equal level of roughage. This was not the case for the digestibility of crude fibre. Nitrogen retention was significantly higher on the lower levels of straw and on the pelleted rations of a similar level, and was higher on hay rations than on straw rations. Ration differences in the molar proportions of volatile fatty acids in the rumen liquor were detected.

Pelleting appeared to improve the nutritive value of straw.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Beardsley, D. W. 1964. Symposium on forage utilization: Nutritive value of forage as affected by physical form. II. Beef cattle and sheep studies. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 233245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, A. W. A. 1965. The nutritive value of ground and pelleted barley straw. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66: 131137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottyn, G. C. and Boucque, C. V. 1968. Rapid method for the gas-chromatographic determination of volatile fatty acids in rumen fluid. J. agric. Fd Chem. 16: 105107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, T. J., Irwin, J. H. and Raven, A. M. 1969. The use of coarsely chopped barley straw in high concentrate diets for beef cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 73: 347354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzer, Z. and Levy, D. 1969a. The estimation of empty-body weight of Israeli-Friesian and Herefordx Arab crossbred bull calves. Israeli, agric. Res. 19: 195198.Google Scholar
Holzer, Z. and Levy, D. 1969b. Wheat straw in pelleted fattening rations for cattle. Ktavim 19: 6571 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Kay, M., MacDearmid, A. and MacLeod, N. A. 1970. Intensive beef production. 10. Replacement of cereals with chopped straw. Anim. Prod. 12: 261266.Google Scholar
Kay, M., MacDearmid, A. and Massie, R. 1970. Intensive beef production. 11. Replacement of cereals with ground straw. Anim. Prod. 12: 419424.Google Scholar
Lamming, G. E., Swan, H. and Clarke, R. T. 1966. Studies on the nutrition of ruminants. I. Substitution of maize by milled barley straw in a beef fattening diet, and its effect on performance and carcass quality. Anim. Prod. 8: 303311.Google Scholar
Levy, D. and Holzer, Z. 1971. The relative value of roughage and concentrates for fattening cattle. Anim. Prod. 13: 569579.Google Scholar
Levy, D., Holzer, Z. and Volcani, R. 1968. The effect of age and live weight on feed conversion and yield of saleable meat of intact Israeli-Friesian male calves. Anim. Prod. 10: 325330.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J. 1963. The effect of pelleting and wafering on the feeding value of roughage. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18: 3944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, L. A. 1964. Symposium on forage utilization. Nutritive value of forage as affected by physical form. I. General principles involved with ruminants and effect of feeding pelleted or wafered forage to dairy cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 230238.Google Scholar
Nelson, A. B., Knox, J. H., Ray, E. E. and Neumann, A. L. 1967. Effects of grinding and pelleting a ration on performance of yearling steers. Bull. New Mex. State Univ., No. 512.Google Scholar
Pickard, D. W., Swan, H. and Lamming, G. E. 1969. Studies on the nutrition of ruminants. 4. The use of ground straw of different particle sizes for cattle from twelve weeks of age. Anim. Prod. 11: 543550.Google Scholar
Swan, H. and Lamming, G. E. 1967. Studies on the nutrition of ruminants. II. The effect of level of crude fibre in maize-based rations on the carcass of Friesian steers. Anim. Prod. 9: 203208.Google Scholar
Swan, H. and Lamming, G. E. 1970. The effects of diets containing up to 70% ground barley straw on live-weight gain and carcass composition of yearling Friesian cattle. Anim. Prod. 12: 6370.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. T., Bradley, N. W. and Little, C. O. 1965. Rumenal volatile fatty acid concentrations and performance of steers fed different levels and forms of hay and grain. J. Anim. Sci. 24: 11791183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar