Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:49:11.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters of growth and carcass traits from closed lines of pigs on restricted feeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Y. Gu ,
C. S. Haley  and
R. Thompson
Y. Gu
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Edinburgh Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
C. S. Haley
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Edinburgh Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
R. Thompson
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Edinburgh Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
Get access

Abstract

Data from two selected lines of pigs in closed herds of a breeding company were collected over a 5-year period. The lines were selected for growth rate and leanness and were housed together in the same environment. Animals were performance tested from 35 kg for about 58 days, and were fed individually according to a scale determined by time on test; the boars were more liberally fed than the gilts. At the end of test, average daily gain (ADG) values were calculated and ultrasonic measures were taken of fat depths at the shoulder (SF), loin (LF) and last rib, 4·5 cm (CF) and 8 cm (KF) off the mid line.

Estimates of heritabilities, phenotypic and genetic correlations were obtained from paternal half-sib analyses. All heritability estimates were significantly different from zero and ranged from 0·18 to 0·42 for ADG and from 0·21 to 0·59 for fat depths. The genetic correlations between ADG and fat measurements in boars of the two lines were not significantly different from zero, averaging 0·08; in the gilts they were negative, averaging –0·39.

After long-term selection, appreciable genetic variation remained in the closed lines studied here for growth rate and fat depths. Although sex and feeding level were confounded, it is likely that the genetic correlation between growth rate and fat depth was influenced by the level of feeding and associated with partitioning of energy between lean and fat deposition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , December 1989 , pp. 467 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cameron, N. D., Curran, M. K. and Thompson, R. 1988. Estimation of sire with feeding regime interaction n i pigs. Animal Production 46: 87–95.Google Scholar
Gu, Y. 1988. Estimates of genetic parameters and prediction of responses to selection in commercial pigs. M. Phil. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1977. Users Guide for LSML76. Mixed model least-squares and maximum likelihood computer program. Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Hill, W. G. and Webb, A. J. 1982. Genetics of reproduction in the pig. In Control of Pig Reproduction (ed. Cole, D. J. A. and Foxcroft, G. R.), pp. 541–564. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Kielanowski, J. 1968. The method of pig progeny testing applied in Poland. 1. General principles and physiological background. Proceedings of Meeting of the Sub-Commission on Pig Progeny Testing. 9th Study Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Dublin.Google Scholar
McPhee, C. P. 1981. Selection for efficient lean growth in a pig herd. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32: 681–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPhee, C. P., Rathmell, G. A., Daniels, L. J. and Cameron, N. D. 1988. Selection in pigs for increased lean growth rate on a time-based feeding scale. Animal Production 47: 149–156.Google Scholar
Merks, J. W. M. 1987. Genotype × environment interactions in pig breeding programmes. II. Environmental effects and genetic parameters in central test. Livestock Production Science 16: 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merks, J. W. M. 1989. Genotype × environment interactions in pig breeding programmes. VI. Genetic relations between performances in central test, on-farm test and commercial fattening. Livestock Production Science. In press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G., Smith, C., Makower, M. and Bird, P. J. W. N. 1982. An economic appraisal of pig improvement in Great Britain. 1. Genetic and production aspects. Animal Production 35: 215–224.Google Scholar
Smith, C., King, J. W. B. and Gilbert, N. 1962. Genetic parameters of British Large White bacon pigs. Animal Production 4: 128–143.Google Scholar
Smith, C. and Ross, G. J. S. 1965. Genetic parameters of British Landrace bacon pigs. Animal Production 7: 291–301.Google Scholar
Standal, N. 1973. Studies on breeding and selection schemes in pigs. III. The effect of parity and litter size on the “on-the-farm” testing results. Ada Agriculturae Scandinavica 23: 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. 1982. Methods of estimation of genetic parameters. Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Madrid, Vol. 5, pp. 95–103.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. 1977. Selection for leanness and the energetic efficiency of growth in meat animals. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 36: 53–59.Google Scholar
Willeke, H. and Richter, L. 1979. The effect of parity and litter size on the “on-the-farm” performance tested gilts. Zechrift für Tierzuchtung und Züchtungsbiologie 96: 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar