Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:21:44.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental effects of low intensity systems of animal production in the hills and uplands of the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. A. Milne
J. A. Milne
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH
Get access

Abstract

The extent to which grazing intensities of animal production systems in the uplands of the United Kingdom cause impacts on vegetation, soils, birds, mammals and invertebrates, and influence landscape value and water quality are reviewed. It is argued that these impacts need to be considered in an integrated manner in relation to their responses at the field and landscape scales. Evidence is presented which suggests that a range of grazing intensities is required to obtain significant benefits to the natural heritage. This suggests that new approaches are required to the mechanisms of delivering environmental benefits from grazing systems.

Keywords

animal productionenvironmental impact
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , December 1996 , pp. 363 - 371
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, C. E. and Cresser, M. S. 1995. An assessment of the possible impact of expansion of native woodland cover on the chemistry of Scottish freshwaters. Forest Ecology and Management. 73: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, H. M., Gordon, I. J., Grant, S. A., Hutchings, N. J., Illius, A. W., Milne, J. A. and Sibbald, A. R. 1997. A model of hill grazing systems in the UK. II. The prediction of offtake by sheep, journal ofApplied Ecology. In press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, H. M. and Milne, J. A. 1995. The effects of grazing on vegetation species composition. In Heaths and moorland cultural landscapes (ed. Thompson, D. B. A., Hester, A. and Usher, M. B.), pp. 174–179. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Bullock, C. 1995. Measuring the public benefits of landscape and environmental change: a case of upland grazing extensification. In Heaths and moorland cultural landscapes (ed. Thompson, D. B. A., Hester, A. J. and Usher, M. B.), pp. 277–281. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Chadwick, L. 1991. Farm management handbook 1991/1992. Scottish Agricultural College, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Curry, J. P. 1994. Grassland invertebrates. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Dennis, P., Gordon, I. J. and Aspinall, R. J. 1995. Spatial response of arthropods to patchiness of upland, semi-natural grassland generated by different grazing regimes. In Landscape ecology: theory and application (ed. Griffiths, G.), pp. 190–192. UK Region of the International Association of Landscape Ecology, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Downie, I. S., Brotherfield, J. E. L. and Culson, J. L. 1995. Habitat preferences of sub-montane species in northern England. Ecology. 18: 51–61.Google Scholar
Grieve, I. C., Davidson, D. A. and Gordon, J. E. 1995. Nature, extent and severity of soil erosion in upland Scotland. Land Degradation and Rehabilitation. 6: 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grime, J. P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
Hankey, M. S. 1995. Supporting the countryside — future opportunities. Scottish Land Owners' Federation, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Harding, N. J., Green, R. E. and Summers, R. W. 1994. The effects offuture changes in land use on upland birds in Britain. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. 1995. Eliciting and mapping the attributes of landscape perception. Ph.D. thesis, Heriot-Watt University.Google Scholar
Hester, A. J., Miller, D. R. and Towers, W. 1996. Landscape-scale vegetation change in the Cairngorms, Scotland, 1946·1988: implications for land management. Biological Conservation 77: 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Terrestrial Ecology. 1978. Upland land use in England and Wales (Report CCP 111). Countryside Commission of England and Wales.Google Scholar
McCracken, D. I. and Foster, G. N. 1993. Surface-active invertebrate communities and the availability of potential food for the Chough, Pyrrocoiax pyrrhocorax L., on pastures n i north-west Islay. Pedobiologia. 37: 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marriott, C. A., Bolton, G. R., Common, T. G., Small, J. L. and Barthram, G. T. 1997. Effects of extensification of sheep grazing systems on animal production and species composition of the sward. Proceedings of 16th general meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Grado, Italy. In pressGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. R., Kinnaird, J. W. and Cummins, R. P. 1982. Liability of saplings to browsing on a red deer range in the Scottish Highlands. Journal ofApplied Ecology. 19: 941–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, J. A. and Fisher, G. E. J. 1994. Sward structure with regard to production. In Grassland management and nature conservation (ed. Hagger, R. J. and Peel, S.), pp. 33–42. British Grassland Society occasional symposium No. 28, Reading.Google Scholar
Nolan, A. J., Henderson, D. J. and Merrell, B. G. 1995. The vegetation dynamics of wet heaths in relation to sheep. grazing intensity. In Heaths and moorland cultural landscapes (ed. Thompson, D. B. A., Hester, A. J. and Usher, M. B.), pp. 174–179. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Senft, R. L., Coughenous, M. B., Bailey, D. W., Rittenhouse, R. L., Sala, O. E. and Swift, D. H. 1987. Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies. Bioscience. 37: 789–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. S., Corkhill, P., Shiel, R. S. and Millward, D. 1996. The conservation management of mesotrophic (meadow) grassland in Northern England. II. Effects of grazing, cutting date, fertiliser and seed addition on the vegetation of an agriculturally improved sward. Grass and Forage Science. In press.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. B. A., Macdonald, A. J., Marsden, J. H. and Galbraith, C. A. 1995. Upland heather moorland in Great Britain: a review of international importance, vegetation change and some objectives for nature conservation. Biological Conservation 71: 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, I. A. and Connelly, J. 1995. Improved utilisation of heterogenous pastures by mixed species. In Recent developments in the nutrition of herbivores (ed. Journet, M., Grenet, E., Farce, M.-H., Theriez, M. and Demarquilly, C.), pp. 425–436. INRA, Paris.Google Scholar