Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:55:00.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Endogenous hormone and metabolite concentrations in different breeds of beef steer on two systems of production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. M. Beeby
Affiliation:
Department of Agricuhure and Horticulture, University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD
W. Haresign
Affiliation:
Department of Agricuhure and Horticulture, University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD
H. Swan
Affiliation:
Department of Agricuhure and Horticulture, University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD
Get access

Abstract

The experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of sire breed and production system on serum GH, insulin, prolactin, glucose and blood urea nitrogen concentrations in growing beef cattle. A total of 187 steers, representing a wide range of maturity types, was reared to slaughter on either the 16-month or 24-month production systems in experiment 1, and blood samples for hormone and metabolite determinations were collected at 3-monthly intervals. Experiment 2 compared only the extremes of maturity type, with four early- and four late-maturing animals on each production system. Blood samples from these animals were collected hourly for 10 h on 2 or more consecutive days at six different time periods during the growth of the animals.

Although significant between-breed differences in hormone concentrations were observed in experiment 1, there were no significant correlations between growth rate and circulating hormone concentrations. These results were largely borne out by the more detailed blood sampling used in experiment 2.

Differences did occur in live-weight gain, GH and insulin concentrations between production systems, although these were largely determined by the induced changes resulting from the imposition of a store period on the animals produced through the 24-month production system.

These results indicate that between-breed differences in growth rate cannot be accounted for by differences in circulating GH, insulin and prolactin concentrations. Rather, it appears that the hormones are primarily used to enable the animal to adjust its metabolism to changes in nutrient supply.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bassett, J. M. 1975. Dietary and gastro-intestinal control of hormones regulating carbohydrate metabolism in ruminants. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (ed. McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 383398. University of New England Publishing Unit, Armidale, Australia.Google Scholar
Beeby, J. M. and Swan, H. 1983. Hormone and metabolite concentrations in beef steers of two maturity types under two systems of production. Animal Production 37: 345351.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M., Driver, P. M., Brown, W. B., Scanes, C. G. and Hart, I. C. 1979. The effect of daylength on the growth of lambs. 2. Blood concentrations of growth hormone, prolactin, insulin and thyroxine, and the effect of feeding. Animal Production 29: 4351.Google Scholar
Grigsby, M. E. and Trenkle, A. H. 1979. Effect of biological type and estradiol implants on plasma growth hormone and insulin in steers. Journal of Animal Science 49: Suppl. 1, p. 371 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Hart, I. C., Bines, J. A., James, S. and Morant, S. V. 1985. The effect of injecting or infusing low doses of bovine growth hormone on milk yield, milk composition and the quantity of hormone in the milk serum of cows. Animal Production 40: 243250.Google Scholar
Hart, I. C. and Johnsson, I. D. 1986. Growth hormone and growth in meat producing animals. In Control and Manipulation of Animal Growth (ed. Buttery, P. J. and Haynes, N. B.), pp. 135159. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, I. C., Morant, S. V. and Roy, J. H. B. 1981. A note on the variability of hormone concentrations in twice-weekly blood samples taken from heifer calves during the first 110 days of life. Animal Production 32: 215217.Google Scholar
Keller, D. G., Smith, V. G., Coulter, G. H. and King, G. J. 1979. Serum growth hormone concentration in Hereford and Angus calves: effects of breed, sire, sex, age of dam and diet. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 59: 367373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlson, D. L., Davis, S. L., Ferrell, C. L. and Jenkins, T. G. 1981. Plasma growth hormone, prolactin and thyrotropin secretory patterns in Hereford and Simmental calves. Journal of Animal Science 53: 371375.Google Scholar
Preston, R. L., Schnakenberg, D. D. and Pfander, W. H. 1965. Protein utilization in ruminants. 1. Blood urea nitrogen as affected by protein intake. Journal of Nutrition 86: 281288.Google Scholar
Raud, H. R., Kiddy, C. A. and Odell, W. D. 1971. The effect of stress upon the determination of serum prolactin by radioimmunoassay. Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine 136: 689693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, J. H. B., Hart, I. C., Gillies, C. M., Stobo, I. J. F., Ganderton, P. and Perfitt, M. W. 1983. A comparison of preruminant bull calves of the Hereford × Friesian, Aberdeen Angus × Friesian and Friesian breeds. Plasma metabolic hormones in relation to age, and the relationship of metabolic hormone concentration with dry-matter intake and heart rate. Animal Production 36: 237251.Google Scholar
Southgate, J. R., Cook, G. L. and Kempster, A. J. 1982. A comparison of the progeny of British Friesian dams and different sire breeds in 16- and 24-month beef production systems. 1. Live-weight gain and efficiency of food utilization. Animal Production 34: 155166.Google Scholar
Treacher, R. J. 1978. Dietary protein levels and blood composition of dairy cattle. In The Use of Blood Metabolites in Animal Production (ed. Lister, D.), Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, No. 1, pp. 133142.Google Scholar
Truscott, T. G., Wood, J. D., Gregory, N. G. and Hart, I. C. 1983. Fat deposition in Hereford and Friesian steers. 3. Growth efficiency and fat mobilization. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100: 277284.Google Scholar
Verde, L. S. and Trenkle, A. 1982. Concentration of hormones in plasma from cattle with different growth potentials. Journal of Animal Science 55: Suppl. 1, p. 230 (Abstr.).Google Scholar