Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:32:47.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficiency of nucleus breeding schemes in dual-purpose cattle of Tanzania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. S. Kasonta  and
G. Nitter
J. S. Kasonta
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Husbandry and Breeding, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstrasse 17, 7000 Stuttgart 70, West Germany
G. Nitter
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Husbandry and Breeding, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstrasse 17, 7000 Stuttgart 70, West Germany
Get access

Abstract

For the Mpwapwa cattle breed in Tanzania, the efficiency of various breeding schemes including an open nucleus was investigated by model calculations. Artificial insemination and intensive recording of production are assumed to be applied in a nucleus which is the main breeding unit. As a pre-nucleus, associated herds with less intense data recording serve as the basis to screen superior cows for nucleus replacements, provide the capacity for progeny testing, and operate as bull multipliers for commercial herds.

The criteria of efficiency were genetic gain and profit from selection for a dual purpose breeding objective (milk and beef) in a total population of 10 000 cows. Introducing a two breeding tier scheme through separating all recorded cows into a nucleus and pre-nucleus leads to an increase of the genetic gain rather than the profit. Further improvement is obtained by introduction of artificial insemination in pre-nucleus herds. The nucleus size should not exceed about 5% of the cow population and an optimum size of the pre-nucleus is about 15%. Opening the nucleus to replacement cows coming from the pre-nucleus affects the aggregate genetic gain very little although it can be recommended if milk yield is to be mainly improved or if the total profit is taken into account. Furthermore, the nucleus should be opened if there is little difference between the heritabilities in the nucleus and pre-nucleus and also in order to avoid detrimental effects of inbreeding and genotype × environment interaction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 245 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cunningham, E. P. 1983. Report on conservation of the Kenana and Butana breeds. Consultancy Report. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
Getz, W. R., Hutchison, H. G., Kyomo, M. L., MacHa, A. M. and Mpiri, D. 1986. Development of a dual-purpose cattle composite in the tropics. 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Lincoln, Nebraska, Vol. XI, pp. 493–498.Google Scholar
Hopkins, I. R. 1978. Some optimum age structures and selection methods in open nucleus breeding schemes with overlapping generations. Animal Production 26: 267–276.Google Scholar
Jackson, N. and Turner, H. N. 1972. Optimal structure for a cooperative nucleus breeding system. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 9: 55–64.Google Scholar
James, J. W. 1977. Open nucleus breeding systems. Animal Production 24: 287–305.Google Scholar
Jones, L. P. and Napier, K. M. 1980. Economic comparison of open and closed nucleus breeding schemes for wool production. Agricultural Systems 5: 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasonta, J. S. 1988. Population analysis and model calculations for a breeding scheme in the Mpwapwa cattle of Tanzania. Thesis, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Katyega, P. M. J. 1987. Mpwapwa cattle of Tanzania. Animal Genetic Resources Information 6: 23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHau, K. W. 1988. Production characteristics of Mpwapwa cattle. 1. Lactation yield and length. World Animal Review 65: 11–17.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development. 1980. Key activities in livestock development National Food Strategy Vol. 1, pp. 49–Google Scholar
Niebel, E. and Karras, K. 1987. ZUPLAN. An extended version of a general computer program for model calculations and optimization of animal breeding plans. Institute of Animal Husbandry and Breeding, University of Hohenheim. (Mineo).Google Scholar
Niebll, E. and Fewson, D. 1988. Population sector models — cattle breeding programmes. In Modelling of Livestock Production Systems (ed. Korver, S. and Arendonk, J. A. M. van), pp. 182–191. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1988. Genetic improvements of livestock using nucleus breeding units. World Animal Review 65: 2–10.Google Scholar