Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:27:29.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of source population, feeding regimen, sex and day of slaughter on the muscle quality characteristics of British crossbred pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. J. Kempster
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, P.O. Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes MK2 2EF
D. G. Evans
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, P.O. Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes MK2 2EF
J. P. Chadwick
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, P.O. Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes MK2 2EF
Get access

Abstract

Data for 15 487 pigs taken from the first 8 years (1973–81) of the Meat and Livestock Commission's Commercial Pig Evaluation were used to examine the effects of sex, feeding regimen, slaughter weight and day of slaughter on muscle quality characteristics in 20 populations (pigs from different commercial breeding companies and control populations). The characteristics examined included pH measurements both at 45 min post mortem (pH,) and after overnight cooling (pH2), in the m. longissimus and m. semimembranosus. Visual assessments of m. longissimus colour and condition were also made.

The overall mean for pH, in the m. longissimus was 6·34; 0·12 of pH, values were less than 6·0. The proportion of carcasses visually assessed as either pale or wet was 0·116, and 0·027 were assessed as both pale and wet.

The populations were compared separately within each of three time periods (covering the full 8 years) since significant population × time period interactions were recorded for several characteristics. Within each period the populations differed significantly for all characteristics examined (P < 0·05); but with the exception of two extreme populations, the differences were relatively unimportant.

The effects of sex, feeding regimen and slaughter weight were negligible but the effect of day of slaughter was very important: the s.d. of pH1 was reduced by 0·15 when calculated within day but by only 0·01 when adjusted for all other factors.

Muscle quality characteristics were poorly correlated with carcass characteristics: the highest correlation within day of slaughter was −0·23, recorded between pH, and ham conformation score.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E., Forrest, J. C., Chapman, A. B., First, N., Bray, R. W. and Briskey, E. J. 1966. Phenotypic and genetic associations between porcine muscle properties. J. Anim. Sci. 25: 962966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton-Gade, P. A. 1979. Some experience of measuring the meat quality of pig carcasses. In Muscle Function and Porcine Meat Quality, pp. 6170. Acta Agric. scand. Suppl. 21.Google Scholar
Chadwick, J. P. and Kempster, A. J. 1983. A repeat national survey (ten years on) of muscle pH values in commercial bacon carcasses. Meat Sci. 9: 101111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallwey, W. J. and Tarrant, P. V. 1979. Influence of environmental factors on ultimate pH in commercial and purebred pigs. In Muscle Function and Porcine Meat Quality, pp. 3238. Acta Agric. scand. Suppl. 21.Google Scholar
Jonsson, P., Jensen, P. and Pedersen, O. K. 1972. Genetic aspects of meat quality in pigs. Annls. Gén. Sél. Anim. 4: 99116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempster, A. J. 1979. Effect of breed improvement on meat quality. Inst. Meat Bull. 103: 1220.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J. and Cuthbertson, A. 1975. A national survey of muscle pH values in commercial pig carcasses. J. Fd Technol. 10: 7380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. and Harrington, G. 1982. Carcase Evaluation in Livestock Breeding, Production and Marketing. Granada, St. Albans.Google Scholar
Lundstrom, K. 1975. Genetic parameters estimated on data from the Swedish pig progeny testing with special emphasis on meat colour. Swed. J. agric. Res. 5: 209221.Google Scholar
Lundström, K., Nilsson, H. and Malmfors, B. 1979. Interrelations between meat quality characteristics in pigs. In Muscle Function and Porcine Meat Quality, pp. 7180. Acta Agric. scand. Suppl. 21.Google Scholar
MacDougall, D. B., Cuthbertson, A. and Smith, R. J. 1969. The assessment of pig meat paleness by reflectance photometry. Anim. Prod. 11: 243246.Google Scholar
McGloughlin, Patricia and McLoughlin, J. V. 1975. The heritability of pH, in longissimus dorsi muscle in Landrace and Large White pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2: 271280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1980. Commercial Pig Evaluation, Management and Procedures. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1983. Very Lean Pigs. A Report Prepared by a Planning and Development Team. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Searle, S. R. 1971. Linear Models. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Smith, W. C. and Lesser, D. 1982. An economic assessment of pale, soft exudative musculature in the fresh and cured pig carcass. Anim. Prod. 34: 291299.Google Scholar
Staun, H. and Jensen, P. 1972. Phenotypic and genetic parameters of some carcass traits in Danish Landrace pigs. Yearbook, Roy. Vet. Agric. Univ. Copenhagen, pp. 104114.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. McM. 1966. The incidence of watery muscle in commercial British pigs. J. Fd Technol. 1: 193199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walstra, P., Minkema, D., Sybesma, W. and Van Des Pas, J. G. C. 1971. Genetic aspects of meat quality and stress resistance in experiments with various breeds and crosses. Proc. Conf. Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod., Paris. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Webb, A. J., Carden, A. E., Smith, C. and Imlah, P. 1982. Porcine stress syndrome in pig breeding. Proc. 2nd Wld Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Madrid, Vol. 5, pp. 588608.Google Scholar