Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:37:06.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of sex and live weight on the growing pig's response to dietary protein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. G. Campbell ,
M. R. Taverner  and
D. M. Curic
R. G. Campbell
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia
M. R. Taverner
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia
D. M. Curic
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Thirty-two entire male and 32 female pigs were used to investigate responses to eight concentrations of dietary protein, with constant amino acid composition ranging from 90 to 248 g/kg over different live-weight stages between 20 and 90 kg.

With increasing live weight there was a continuous decline in the concentrations of dietary protein required to support maximum growth and an increasing difference between the sexes in their response to dietary protein. Between 20 and 40 kg live weight sex had no significant effect on growth performance or on the dietary protein concentration for maximum growth (P > 0·05). Over all heavier live-weight stages entire males grew faster and more efficiently than females, and between 20 and 70, 20 and 80, 20 and 90 and between 50 and 90 kg live weight they responded to higher concentrations of dietary protein than females. During the latter stages of growth, the performance of females was also depressed on the two highest-protein diets. This was associated with a significant increase in carcass fat thickness at 90 kg.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , February 1988 , pp. 123 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Batterham, E. S., Giles, L. R. and Dettmann, E. B. 1985. Amino acid and energy interactions in growing pigs. 1. Effects of food intake, sex and live weight on the responses of growing pigs to lysine concentration. Animal Production 40: 331–343.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G., Taverner, M. R. and Curic, D. M. 1983. The influence of feeding level from 20 to 45 kg live weight on the performance and body composition of female and entire male pigs. Animal Production 36: 193–199.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G., Taverner, M. R. and Curic, D. M. 1984. Effect of feeding level and dietary protein content on the growth, body composition and rate of protein deposition in pigs growing from 45 to 90 kg. Animal Production 38: 233–240.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G., Taverner, M. R. and Curic, D. M. 1985a. Effects of sex and energy intake between 48 and 90 kg live weight on protein deposition in growing pigs. Animal Production 40: 497–503.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G., Taverner, M. R. and Curic, D. M. 1985b. The influence of feeding level on the protein requirement of pigs between 20 and 45 kg live weight. Animal Production 40: 489–496.Google Scholar
Cooke, R., Lodge, G. A. and Lewis, D. 1972. Influence of energy and protein concentration in the diet on the performance of growing pigs. 1. Response to protein intake on a high-energy diet. Animal Production 14: 35–46.Google Scholar
Cresswell, D. C.Wallace, H. D., Combs, G. E., Palmer, A. Z. and West, R. L. 1975. Lysine and tryptophan in diets for boars and barrows. Journal of Animal Science 40: 167 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Fox, M. 1971. Nutritional evaluation of meat and bone meal. Divisional Report, Victorian Department of Agriculture, Division of Agricultural Chemistry, No. 2.Google Scholar
Giles, L. R., Batterham, E. S. and Dettmann, E. B. 1986. Amino acid and energy interactions in growing pigs. 2. Effects of food intake, sex and live weight on responses to lysine concentration in barley-based diets. Animal Production 42: 133–144.Google Scholar
Holmes, C. W., Carr, J. R. and Pearson, G. 1980. Some aspects of the energy and nitrogen metabolism of boars, gilts and barrows given diets containing different concentrations of protein. Animal Production 31: 279–289.Google Scholar
Newell, J. A. and Bowland, J. P. 1972. Performance, carcass composition and fat composition of boars, gilts and barrows fed two levels of protein. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 52: 543–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, J. H. D. and Lamming, G. E. 1967. The influence of castration on the growth of male pigs in relation to high levels of dietary protein. Animal Production 9: 535–545.Google Scholar
Taverner, M. R., Campbell, R. G. and King, R. H. 1977. The relative protein and energy requirements of boars, gilts and barrows. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 17: 574–580.Google Scholar
Tyler, R. W., Luce, W. G., Johnson, R. K., Maxwell, C. V., Hintz, R. L. and Walters, L. E. 1983. The effects of level of crude protein on performance of growing boars. Journal of Animal Science 57: 364–372.Google Scholar
Williams, I. H. 1976. The nutrition of young pigs in relation to body composition. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Williams, W. D., Cromwell, G. L., Stahly, T. S. and Overfield, J. R. 1984. The lysine requirement of the growing boar versus barrow. Journal of Animal Science 58: 657–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yen, H. T., Cole, D. J. A. and Lewis, D. 1986a. Amino acid requirements of growing pigs. 7. The response of pigs from 25 to 55 kg live weight to dietary ideal protein. Animal Production 43: 141–154.Google Scholar
Yen, H. T., Cole, D. J. A. and Lewis, D. 1986b. Amino acid requirements of growing pigs. 8. The response of pigs from 50 to 90 kg live weight to dietary ideal protein. Animal Production 43: 155–165.Google Scholar