Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:09:57.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of selection for production and maternal diet on maiden dairy heifer fertility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

J. E. Pryce ,
G. Simm  and
J. J. Robinson
J. E. Pryce*
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
G. Simm
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
J. J. Robinson
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
*
Corresponding author: Livestock Improvement Corporation Ltd, Private Bag 3016, Hamilton, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to investigate reproductive performance and the influence of maternal environment on reproductive performance in two genetic lines of maiden heifers. These were given food and managed in the same way at the Langhill Dairy Cattle Research Centre. The two genetic lines were established in 1973; one has been selected for high combined yield of fat plus protein (selection line; S) and the other has been maintained at around the UK average for genetic merit of yield of fat plus protein (control line; C). Analysis of the reproductive performance of 988 heifers born between 1981 and 1998 showed that S heifers were poorer (all P < 0·05) than C heifers for all reproductive measures: conception at first service (S: 0·64, s.e. 0·02; C: 0·71, s.e. 0·03), interval between first and last service (S: 18·2 days, s.e. 2·2; C: 13·4 days, s.e. 2·2) and number of services per conception (S: 1·49 services, s.e. 0·06; C: 1·39 services, s.e. 0·06). S heifers were also younger at first service than C heifers (474·9 days v. 480·1 days, s.e. 1·9, for S and C respectively; P • 01). Fertility of service sires may have had some influence on these results, but this could not be investigated here, as S heifers were mated only to high merit bulls and C heifers to average merit bulls. However, within genetic line, the yearly downward trend in the average number of services per conception of heifers was significantly different from zero for the S line, but not the C line. There were no statistically significant relationships between conception rates in maiden heifers and their subsequent reproductive performance in first lactation. The effect of maternal environment on the reproductive performance of daughters as maiden heifers was investigated. There were no statistically significant relationships between daughter reproductive performance and dam parity or the feeding system of the dam (either a high or low level of concentrates). Within the limited range of nutritional status of dams during the periods post calving and in early pregnancy, there was no statistically significant effect of maternal nutrition on daughter reproductive performance.

Keywords

fertilityheifersmaternal effects
Type
Breeding and genetics
Information
Animal Science , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , June 2002 , pp. 415 - 421
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, D. J. P. 1992. Impact of diet on critical events in development: the effect of nutrition of the fetus and neonate on cardiovascular disease in adult life. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 51: 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borwick, S. C., Rhind, S. M., McMillen, S. R. and Racey, P. A. 1997. Effect of undernutrition of ewes from the time of mating on fetal ovarian development in mid gestation. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 9: 711–715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domecq, J. J., Skidmore, A. L., Lloyd, J. W. and Kaneene, J. B. 1997. Relationship between body condition scores and conception at first artificial insemination in a large dairy herd of high yielding Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 113–120.Google Scholar
Esslemont, R. J. and Kossaibati, M. A. 1997. Culling in 50 dairy herds in England. Veterinary Record 140: 36–39.Google Scholar
Ford, J. T. and Klindt, J. 1989. Sexual differentiation and the growth process. In Animal growth regulation (ed. Campion, D. R. Housman, G. J., and Martin, R. J.), pp. 317–336. Plenum Publishing Corporation, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnsworthy, P. C. 1988. The effect of energy reserves at calving on performance of dairy cows. In Nutrition and lactation in the dairy cow (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C.), pp. 157–170. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. G., Sim, D. A. and Hunter, E. A. 1995. Effects of nutrition in utero and in early life on the subsequent lifetime and reproductive performance of Scottish Blackface ewes in two management systems. Animal Science 60: 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, L. B., Freeman, A. E. and Berger, P. J. 1983. Association of heifer fertillity with cow fertility and yield in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 66: 306–314.Google Scholar
Hawkins, P., Crowe, C., McGarrigle, H., Saito, T., Ozaki, T., Stratford, L., Noakes, D. and Hanson, M. 1998. Effect of maternal nutrient restriction in early gestation on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responses during acute hypoxaemia in late gestation fetal sheep. Journal of the Society of Gynecological Investigation 5: (suppl. 1) 20.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, J., Lugt, A. W. van der, Werf, J. H. J. van der and Ouweltjes, W. 1994. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for milk production and fertility traits in upgraded dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 40: 225–232.Google Scholar
Jong, G. de 1995. Sire breeding values for daughters’ fertility in the Netherlands. Proceedings of the open session of the Interbull annual meeting, Prague, Czech Republic, 7-8 September 1995.Google Scholar
Kadarmideen, H. N., Thompson, R. and Simm, G. 2000. Linear and threshold model genetic parameters for disease, fertility and milk production in dairy cattle. Animal Science 71: 411–420.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1993. Genstat 5 version 4•1. Clarendon Press, London.Google Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Scot, N. and Somerville, S. 1976. Condition scoring of cattle, revised edition. Bulletin no. 6. East of Scotland College of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Oltenacu, P. A., Frick, A. and Lindhe, B. 1991. Relationship of fertility to milk yield in Swedish cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 264–268.Google Scholar
Pedersen, J. and Jensen, J. 1996. Evaluation of female fertility of Danish Sires. In Proceedings of the international workshop on genetic improvement of functional traits in cattle, Gembloux, Belgium (ed. Groen, A. F. Solkner, J. Strandberg, E. and Gengler, N.), Interbull bulletin, vol. 12, pp. 72–77.Google Scholar
Pryce, J. E., Coffey, M. P. and Simm, G. 2001. The relationship between body condition score and reproductive performance. Journal of Dairy Science 84: 1508–1515.Google Scholar
Pryce, J. E., Esslemont, R. J., Thompson, R., Veerkamp, R. F., Kossaibati, M. A. and Simm, G. 1998. Estimation of genetic parameters using health, fertility and production data from a management recording system for dairy cattle. Animal Science 66: 577–584.Google Scholar
Pryce, J. E., Nielsen, B. L., Veerkamp, R. F. and Simm, G. 1999a. Genotype and feeding system effects and interactions for health and fertility traits in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 57: 193–201.Google Scholar
Pryce, J. E., Veerkamp, R. F., Thompson, R., Hill, W. G. and Simm, G. 1997. Genetic aspects of common health disorders and measures of fertility in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Animal Science 65: 353–360.Google Scholar
Pryce, J. E., Wilson, L. A. and Visscher, P. M. 1999b. Effects of selection for production on maiden heifer fertility traits. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 1999, p. 49.Google Scholar
Röxstrom, A., Strandberg, E., Berglund, B., Emanuelson, U. and Philipsson, J. 2001. Genetic and environmental correlations among female fertility traits and milk production in different parities of Swedish Red and White dairy cattle. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica 51: 7–14.Google Scholar
Snijders, S.E. M., Dillon, P., O’Callaghan, D. and Boland, M. P. 2000. Effect of genetic merit, milk yield, body condition and lactation number on in vitro oocyte development in dairy cows. Theriogenology 53: 981–989.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F. 1998. Selection for economic efficiency of dairy cattle using information on live weight and feed intake: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 1109–1119.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F. and Emmans, G. C. 1995. Sources of genetic variation in energetic efficiency in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 44: 87–97.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F., Simm, G. and Oldham, J. D. 1995. Genotype by environment interactions: experience from Langhill. In Breeding and feeding the high genetic merit dairy cow (ed. Lawrence, T. L. J. Gordon, F. J. and Carson, A.), British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 19, pp. 59–66.Google Scholar
Waltner, S. S., McNamara, J. P. and Hillers, J. K. 1993. Relationships of body condition score to production variables in high producing Holstein dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Science 76: 3410–3419.Google ScholarPubMed