Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:36:56.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of recombinant DNA-derived bovine somatotropin on growth, carcass characteristics and meat quality in lambs from three breeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. A. Sinnett-Smith
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Edinburgh Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
J. A. Woolliams
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Edinburgh Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
P. D. Warriss
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Food Research, Bristol Laboratory, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
M. Enser
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Food Research, Bristol Laboratory, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
Get access

Abstract

Purebred lambs from three breeds (East Friesland, Oxford and Texel) were fed to appetite and treated with recombinant DNA-derived bovine somatotropin (BST) at 0·05, 0·10 or 0·20 mg/kg per day or a placebo between 19 and 27 weeks of age.

BST maintained growth over the later stages of treatment but did not affect average daily live-weight gain over the whole treatment period. Food intake was decreased and food conversion efficiency was improved by BST treatment. However, carcass weight and killing-out proportion were decreased by BST treatment in all breeds. Consistent breed differences were observed. Oxford lambs had higher live weights and carcass weights than the other breeds but no breed × treatment interactions were apparent. Ultrasonic backfat depth (mean of measurements at 13th rib and 3rd lumbar vertebra) was reduced by BST treatment in the Oxford (the fattest) and Texel lambs but not in the East Frieslands (the leanest). Ultrasonic muscle depth was not affected by BST; East Friesland lambs had considerably smaller muscle depth than the other breeds.

In the loin joint, BST decreased fat cover and subcutaneous fat proportion and increased longissimus dorsi proportion. There were also marked breed differences with Oxfords fatter than the other breeds. BST treatment did not affect any of the meat quality indicators but some differences between breeds were apparent in ultimate pH and colour of the muscle. Fatty acid composition of the subcutaneous fat was affected by breed but not by BST. East Friesland lambs had higher concentrations of unsaturated and branched chain fatty acids than the other breeds.

A mammogenic response (increased mammary development and some secretory activity) to BST was observed in some female East Friesland and Texel lambs but not in Oxford lambs.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Busboom, J. R., Miller, G. J., Field, R. A., Crouse, J. D., Riley, M. L., Nklms, G. E. and Ferrell, C. L. 1981. Characteristics of fat from heavy ram and wether lambs. Journal of Animal Science 52: 8392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler-Hogg, B. W. and Johnsson, I. D. 1987. Bovine growth hormone in lambs: effects on carcass composition and tissue distribution in crossbred females. Animal Production 44: 117124.Google Scholar
Buttery, P. J. 1983. Hormonal control of protein deposition in animals. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 42: 137148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cameron, N. D. and Smith, C. 1985. Estimation of carcass leanness in young rams. Animal Production 40: 303308.Google Scholar
Davis, S. L., Garrigus, U. S. and Hinds, F. C. 1970. Metabolic effects biosynthetic bovine somatotropin on live-weight gain, carcass composition and wool growth in young lambs. Animal Production 44: 405414.Google Scholar
Davis, S. L., Garrigus, U. S. and Hinds, F. C. 1970. Metabolic effects of growth hormone and diethylstilbestrol in lambs. II. Effects of daily ovine diethylstilbestrol in lambs. II. Effects of daily ovine growth hormone injections on plasma metabolites and nitrogen-retention in fed lambs. Journal of Animal Science 30: 236240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, W. R. H., Ørskov, E. R. and Garton, G. A. 1972. Fatty acid composition of triglycerides of lambs fed on barley-based diets. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 31: 19A20A.Google ScholarPubMed
Elliot, R. J. 1969. The relationship between the subjective and objective measurement of pork quality. Journal of Food Technology 4: 147156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, I. C. and Johnsson, I. D. 1986. Growth hormone and growth in meat producing animals. In Control and Manipulation of Animal Growth (ed. Buttery, P. J., Haynes, N. B. and Lindsay, D. B.), pp. 135159. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. B., Wong, E. and Birch, E. J. 1977. Analysis of 4-methyloctanoic acid and other medium-chain length fatty acid constituents of ovine tissue lipids. Lipids 2: 340347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnsson, I. D. and Hart, I. C. 1986. Manipulation of milk yield with growth hormone. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition — 1986 (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 105123. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnsson, I. D., Hart, I. C. and Butler-hogg, B. W. 1985. The effects of exogenous bovine growth hormone and bromocriptine on growth, body development, fleece weight and plasma concentrations of growth hormone, insulin and prolactin in female lambs. Animal Production 41: 207217.Google Scholar
Johnsson, I. D., Hart, I. C. and Turvey, A. 1986. Pre-pubertal mammogencsis in the sheep. 3. The effects of restricted feeding or daily administration of bovine growth hormone and bromocriptine on mammary growth and morphology. Animal Production 42: 53–53.Google Scholar
Johnsson, I. D., Hathorn, D. J., Wilde, R. M., Treacher, T. T. and Butler-hogg, B. W. 1987. The effects of dose and method of administration of biosynthetic bovine somatotropin on live-weight gain, carcass composition and wool growth in young lambs. Animal Production 44: 405414.Google Scholar
MacHlin, L. J. 1972. Effect of porcine growth hormone on growth and carcass composition of the pig. Journal of Animal Science 35: 794800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClelland, T. H., Bonaiti, B. and Taylor, St C. S. 1976. Breed differences in body composition of equally mature sheep. Animal Production 23: 281293.Google Scholar
MacDougall, D. B. and Rhodes, D. N. 1972. Characteristics of the appearance of meat. III. Studies on the colour of meat from young bulls. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 23: 637647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, L. A., Wien, S., Duouette, P. F., Rickes, E. L. and Cordes, E. H. 1983. Effects of exogenous growth hormone and diethylstilbestrol on growth and carcass composition of growing lambs. Journal of Animal Science 56: 13151323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pell, J. M., Blake, L. A., Buttle, H. L., Johnsson, I. D., Simmonds, A. D. and Morrell, D. J. 1987. Insulin-like growth factor-I and growth hormone in sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 46: 48A (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Pullar, R. A., Johnsson, I. D., Chadwick, P. M. E. and Hart, I. C. 1986. Recombinant bovine somatotropin is growth promoting and lipolytic in fattening lambs. Animal Production 42: 433434 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Royal Statistical Society. 1978. The GLIM System Release 3. Numerical Algorithms Group, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sinnett-Smith, P. A. and Woolliams, J. A. 1989. Antilipogenic but not lipolytic effects of recombinant DNA-derivcd bovine somatotropin treatment on ovine adipose tissue: variation in the genetic type. International Journal of Biochemistry 21: 535540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, J. F. and Veenhuizen, E. L. 1978. Growth performance, carcass composition and plasma hormone levels in wether lambs when treated with growth hormone and thyrotropin. Journal of Animal Science 47: Suppl. 1, p. 397 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Wolf, B. T., Smith, C. and Sales, D. I. 1980. Growth and carcass composition in the crossbred progeny of six terminal sire breeds of sheep. Animal Production 31: 307313.Google Scholar
Wong, E., Nixon, L. N. and Johnson, C. B. 1975. Volatile medium chain fatty acids and mutton flavour. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 23: 495498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, J. D. 1984. Fat deposition and the quality of fat tissue in meat animals. In Fats in Animal Nutrition (ed. Wiseman, J.), pp. 407435. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar