Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:21:07.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of nutrition in utero and in early life on the subsequent lifetime reproductive performance of Scottish Blackface ewes in two management systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. G. Gunn ,
D. A. Sim  and
E. A. Hunter
R. G. Gunn
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ
D. A. Sim
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ
E. A. Hunter
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural Statistics Service, James Clerk Maxwell Building, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ
Get access

Abstract

Over 3 years, a flock of Scottish Blackface ewes was managed so that one-third of the ewes received a high level of nutrition during the last 100 days of pregnancy (P), one-third received a high level of nutrition during the first 100 days of lactation (L) and one-third received a low level of nutrition as derived from a hill grazing over the same two periods (C). From these ewes, 496 ewe lambs were retained at weaning (19 to 22 weeks of age), balanced for treatment, year and birth type. At 6 months of age half of the lambs, similarly balanced, were transferred to an upland grazing system (U) for three breeding years. The other half was retained on the same hill grazing as their mothers for the same period (H). At the end of the study, all ewes were fed to reduce the range in body condition at a synchronized mating and ovulation rates were determined at slaughter.

Differences in live weight of ewes due to treatment between groups P, L and C had disappeared by 18 months. There were no pre-mating differences between treatments in live weight or body condition score except that ewes in group P had higher live weights than those in group C at condition scores greater than 2·75. There was little effect of grazing system on the differences between treatments in live weight or body condition score at 30 and 42 months but H ewes were heavier and fatter at 18 months of age. Ewe mortality was consistently less in group L than in groups P and C and on system H than on system U, although the differences were not statistically significant. Group L had fewer barren ewes than groups P and C, and barrenness was significantly greater in the U than the H system. Group C had proportionally more single than multiple births than either groups P or L.

At the end of the study there were no differences between the treatments in the proportion of ewes successfully mated at the final mating nor in their ovulation rates in relation to pre-mating body condition.

It is concluded that nutrition during either the lactation period or late pregnancy period can influence subsequent lifetime reproductive performance and that this was expressed through an effect on embryo or foetal loss since there were neither residual differences apparent in live weight or condition score nor in ovulation rate potential.

Keywords

developmentnutritionreproductionsheep
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , April 1995 , pp. 223 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allden, W. G. 1970. The effects of nutritional deprivation on the subsequent productivity of sheep and cattle. Nutritional Abstracts and Reviews 40: 1167–1184.Google ScholarPubMed
Allden, W. G. 1979. Undernutrition of the Merino sheep and its sequelae. V. The influence of severe growth restriction during early post-natal life on reproduction and growth in later life. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30: 939–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, R. H., Eadie, J. and Maxwell, T. J. 1978. The development and assessment of a modified hill sheep production system at Sourhope, in the Cheviot hills (1968-1976). Hill Farming Research Organisation 7th report, 1974-77, pp. 69–101.Google Scholar
Brasel, J. O. and Boyd, D. 1975. Influence of thyroid hormone on fetal brain growth and development. In Perinatal thyroid physiology and disease (ed. Fisher, D. A. and Burrows, G. N.). Raven Press, NY.Google Scholar
Everitt, G.C. 1967. Prenatal development of uniparous animals, with particular reference to the influence of maternal nutrition in sheep. In Growth and development of mammals (ed. Lodge, G. A. and Lamming, G. E.) pp. 131–157. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Ford, J. T. and Klindt, J. 1989. Sexual differentiation and the growth process. In Animal groivth regulation (ed. Campion, D. R., Housman, G. J. and Martin, R. J.), pp. 317–336. Plenum Publishing Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, R. G. 1977. The effects of two nutritional environments from 6 weeks prepartum to 12 months of age on lifetime performance and reproductive potential of Scottish Blackface ewes in two adult environments. Animal Production 25: 155–164.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. G., Doney, J. M. and Russel, A. J. F. 1972. Embryo mortality in Scottish Blackface ewes as influenced by body condition at mating and by post-mating nutrition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79: 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, R. G., Doney, J. M., Smith, W. F. and Sim, D. A. 1986. Effects of age and its relationship with body size on reproductive performance in Scottish Blackface ewes. Animal Production 43: 279–283.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1987. Genstat V reference manual. Clarendon Press, London.Google Scholar
Lucas, A. 1991. Programming by early nutrition in man. In The childhood environment and adult disease (ed. Bock, G. R. and Whelan, J.), Ciba Foundation symposium 156, pp. 38–55. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
Parr, R. A., Cumming, I. A. and Clarke, I. J. 1982. Effects of maternal nutrition and plasma progesterone concentrations on survival and growth of the sheep embryo in early gestation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 98: 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reardon, T. F. and Lambourne, L. J. 1966. Early nutrition and lifetime reproductive performance of ewes. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 6: 106–108.Google Scholar
Rhind, S. M. 1992. Nutrition: its effects on endocrine profiles and reproductive performance in female sheep and goats. In Progress in sheep and goat research (ed. Speedy, A.), pp. 25–51. CAB International, Oxford.Google Scholar
Schinckel, P. G. 1963. The potential for increasing efficiency of feed utilization through newer knowledge of animal nutrition, (c) Sheep and goat. Proceedings of the first world conference on animal production, Rome, pp. 199–218.Google Scholar
Smart, J. L. 1991. Critical periods in brain development. In The childhood environment and adult disease. (ed. Bock, G. R. and Whelan, J.), Ciba Foundation symposium 156, pp. 109–128. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. 1967. A comparison of the body size, fleece weight and maternal performance of five breeds of sheep kept in one environment. Animal Production 9: 177–195.Google Scholar