Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:24:43.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of concentrate energy source on the milk production of dairy cows given a grass silage-based diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. Huhtanen ,
S. Jaakkola  and
E. Saarisalo
P. Huhtanen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, PO Box 28, FlN-00014University of Helsinki, Finland
S. Jaakkola
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, PO Box 28, FlN-00014University of Helsinki, Finland
E. Saarisalo
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, PO Box 28, FlN-00014University of Helsinki, Finland
Get access

Abstract

Sixteen Finnish Ayrshire cows were used in a four period cyclic change-over experiment to evaluate eight concentrate supplements in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. Two concentrate energy sources (starchy and fibrous) were used, each given with two levels (0 and 180 g/kg on a dry-matter (DM) basis) ofrapeseed meal (RSM) and two levels (0 and 180g/kg on DM basis) of wet distillers' solubles (WDS). The starchy concentrate (S) comprised rolled barley and oats (1:1). For the cows given the fibrous concentrate (F), 600 g/kg of the grain mixture was replaced with a mixture of fibrous by-products. Grass silage was offered ad libitum and the supplements offered at a rate of 9 kg/day (fresh weight).

The cows offered F supplements consumed more silage DM than those offered S supplements (P < 0·01) but the difference in the total DM intake was smaller. The cows given S supplements produced slightly more milk than those given F supplement (26·5 v. 25·9 kg/day) but no differences were observed in the yield of milk constituents between the energy supplements. Replacing starch with fibre in the concentrate had no effect on the apparent digestibility of organic matter but tended to increase that of neutral-detergent fibre.

Including RSM in the supplement increased total DM intake (P<0·05) and led to increases in the yield of milk and milk constituents (P < 0·001 and P < 0·01). Diet apparent digestibility was not affected by RSM supplementation.

There were no significant interactions between concentrate energy source and RSM supplementation. Including WDS in the diet had no effect on food intake. Production responses to WDS supplementation varied with the concentrate energy source. WDS increased (at least P< 0·05) milk yield (1·0 kg/day) and the yields of fat (76 g/day) and protein (48 g/day) when given with the starchy concentrate. With the fibrous concentrate WDS had no effect on milk and protein yield, and decreased fat yield by 52 g/day (P < 0·05). The positive responses in the yields of milk fat and protein to RSM and WDS supplementation were almost additive with the starchy concentrate. Inclusion of WDS in the diet increased the apparent digestibility of organic matter and gross energy.

Keywords

concentratesdairy cowsgrass silagemilk production
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 31 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1984. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Supplement 1. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Ala-Seppälä, H., Huhtanen, P. and Näsi, M. 1988. Silage intake and milk production in cows given barley or barley fibre with or without distiller's solubles. Journal of Agricultural Science in Finland 66: 723–733.Google Scholar
Blauwiekel, R., Huhtanen, P. and Saastamoinen, I. 1992. Effect of fishmeal or barley protein and VFA infusions on milk yield and composition and blood metabolites. Journal of Dairy Science 75: suppl. 1, pp. 99.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E., Gill, M. S. and Watson, J. N. 1981. Silage and milk production: a comparison between barley and dried sugar beet pulp as silage supplements. Gross and Forage Science 36: 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Martin, P. A. and Robertson, S. 1989. Optimizing compound feed use in dairy cows with high intakes of silage. In Recent advances in animal nutrition (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 175–193. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Thomas, P. C. and Anderson, F. J. 1983. Volatile fatty acid proportions and lactic acid metabolism in the rumen in sheep and cattle receiving silage diets. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101: 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choung, J. J., Chamberlain, D. G. and Thomas, P. C. 1990. Effects of abomasal infusion of protein on milk production in cows given grass silage diets. Proceedings of the ninth silage conference, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp. 72–73.Google Scholar
Davis, A. W. and Hall, W. B. 1969. Cyclic change-over designs. Bioinetrica 56: 283–293.Google Scholar
Dhiman, T. R., Cadorniga, C. and Satter, L. D. 1993. Protein and energy supplementation of high alfalfa silage diets during early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 1945–1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Patent Office. 1982. Additive composition of animal feedingstuffs. European patent application no. 0 043202.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1984. The effect of level of concentrate supplementation given with grass silage during winter on the total lactation performance of autumn-calving dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102: 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huhtanen, P. 1987. The effects of barley, umolassed sugar beet pulp and molasses on milk production, digestibility and digesta passage in dairy cows given silage based diet. Journal of Agricultural Science in Finland 59: 101–120.Google Scholar
Huhtanen, P. 1988. The effects of barley, unmolassed beet pulp and molasses supplements on organic matter, nitrogen and fibre digestion in the rumen of cattle given a silage diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology 20: 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huhtanen, P. 1992. The effects of barley vs barley fibre with or without distiller's solubles on site and extent of nutrient digestion in cattle fed grass-silage-based diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology 36: 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huhtanen, P. 1993. The effects of concentrate energy source and protein content on milk production in cows given grass silage ad libitum. Grass and Forage Science 48: 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huhtanen, P. and Miettinen, H. 1992. Milk production and concentrations of blood metabolites as influenced by the level of wet distiller's solubles in dairy cows receiving grass silage-based diet. Agricultural Science in Finland 1: 289–290.Google Scholar
Jaakkola, S. and Huhtanen, P. 1992. Rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in cattle given intraruminal infusions of lactic acid with grass silage based diet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 119:411–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaakkola, S. and Huhtanen, P. 1993. The effects of the forage preservation method and the proportion of concentrate on nitrogen digestion and rumen fermentation in cattle. Gross and Forage Science 48:146–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, J. A., Oldham, J. D., Haresign, W. and Garnsworthy, P. C. 1990. The effect of patterns of rumen fermentation on the response by dairy cows to dietary protein concentration. British journal of Nutrition 63:177–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacRae, J. C. and Lobley, G. E. 1986. Interaction between energy and protein. In Control of digestion and metabolism in ruminants (ed. Milligan, L. P., Grovum, W. L. and Dobson, A.), pp. 367–385. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Martin, P. A. and Thomas, P. C. 1988. Dietary manipulation of yield and composition of milk: effects of dietary inclusions of barley and oats in untreated or formaldehydetreated forms on milk fatty acid composition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 43:145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayne, C. S. and Gordon, F. J. 1984. The effect of type of concentrate and level of concentrate feeding on milk production. Animal Production 39: 65–76.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries. 1984. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Bulletin 43. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Moran, J. B. 1986. Cereal grains in complete diets for dairy cows: a comparison of rolled barley, wheat and oats and of three methods of processing oats. Animal Production 43: 27–36.Google Scholar
Murphy, M., Khalili, H. and Huhtanen, P. 1993. The substitution of barley by other carbohydrates in grass silage based diet to dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 41: 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Näsi, M. 1988. Evaluation of barley feed fractions from integrated starch-ethanol production in the diets of ruminants. Journal of Agricultural Science in Finland 60: 701–709.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. D. 1984. Protein energy relationships in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 67:1090–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Reid, G. W. and Tait, C. A. G. 1987. Effect of fish meal on the mobilization of body energy in dairy cows. Animal Production 45: 345–348.Google Scholar
Phipps, R. H., Sutton, J. D., Weller, R. F. and Bines, J. A. 1987. The effect of concentrate composition and method of silage feeding on intake and performance of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109: 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. G., Patterson, D. C., Steen, R. W. J. and Gordon, F. J. 1984. Determination of dry matter and gross energy of grass silage. Proceedings of the seventh silage conference. The Queens University of Belfast, summary of papers, p. 8.Google Scholar
Rajamaki, S. and Rauramaa, A. 1984 The automated determination of urea in milk. Finnish Chemical Letters 2: 47–48.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. L., Bryant, A. M. and McLey, L. M. 1979. Silage and dairy cow production. 3. Abomasal infusion of casein, methionine and glucose on milk yield and composition. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 22: 533–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooke, J. A., Rymer, C., Maya, F. M. and Armstrong, D. G. 1992. Effect of including barley or molassed sugar beet feed in grass silage diets on their digestion by cattle and sheep. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 58: 475–483.Google Scholar
Sloan, B. K., Rowlinson, P. and Armstrong, D. G. 1987. A note on concentrate energy source for dairy cows in mid lactation. Animal Production 45: 321–323.Google Scholar
Sloan, B. K., Rowlinson, P. and Armstrong, D. G. 1988. Milk production in early lactation dairy cows given grass silage ad libitum: influence of concentrate energy source, crude protein content and level of concentrate allowance. Animal Production 46: 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1989. SAS/stat user's guide. Release 6.04. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Bines, J. A., Morant, S. V., Napper, D. J. and Givens, D. I. 1987. A comparison of starchy and fibrous concentrates for milk production, energy utilization and hay intake by Friesian cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109: 375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C., Aston, K., Daley, S. R. and Bass, J. 1986. Milk production from silage. 4. The effect of the composition of the supplement. Animal Production 42: 315–325.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. and Rae, R. C. 1988. Concentrate supplementation of silage for dairy cows. In Nutrition and lactation in the dairy cow (ed. Gamsworthy, P. C.), pp. 327–354. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P. C., Chalmers, J. S., Chamberlain, D. G. and Belibasakis, N. 1980. The effects of diet on the content and composition of crude protein in milk. Proceedings of the third symposium on protein metabolism and nutrition (ed. Oslage, H. J. and Rohr, K.), pp. 522–528. European Association for Animal Production, Braunschweigh.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. A. M. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of British Grassland Society 18: 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuori, M. 1992. Rapeseed meal as a supplementary protein for dairy cows on grass silage-based diet, with the emphasis on the Nordic AAT-PBV feed protein evaluation system. Agricultural Science in Finland 1: 367–439.Google Scholar
Tyrrel, H. F., Haaland, G. L., Moe, P. W. and Brown, A. C. G. 1983. Effect of level and solubility of dietary protein on the energy value of rations fed to lactating dairy cows. In Energy metabolism of farm animals. (ed. Ekern, A. and Sundstøl, F.), European Association of Animal Production publication no. 29, pp. 14–17. Ski, Norway.Google Scholar
Tyrrel, H. F. and Reid, R. A. 1965. Prediction of energy value of cow's milk. Journal of Dairy Science 48:1215–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, E. F. 1990. The efficiency of utilization of metabolizable energy from grass silage-based diets. Proceedings of the ninth silage conference, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp. 36–37.Google Scholar
Unsworth, E. F. and Gordon, F. J. 1985. The energy utilization of wilted and unwilted grass silages by lactating dairy cows. Fifty-eighth annual report of the Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, pp. 13–20. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Belfast.Google Scholar
Van Keulen, J. and Young, B. A. 1977. Acid insoluble ash as a natural marker for digestibility studies. Journal of Animal Science 44: 282–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitelaw, F. G., Milne, J. S., Ørskov, E. R. and Smith, J. S. 1986. The nitrogen and energy metabolism of lactating cows given abomasal infusion of casein. British journal of Nutrition 55: 537–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed