Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:28:26.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of concentrate energy source on silage intake and animal performance with lactating dairy cows offered a range of grass silages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. W. J. Keady ,
C. S. Mayne  and
M. Marsden
T. W. J. Keady
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 SDR
C. S. Mayne
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 SDR
M. Marsden
Affiliation:
J. Bibby Agriculture, ABN House, Oundle Road, Woodston, Peterborough PE2 9QF
Get access

Abstract

A partially balanced change-over design experiment was made to examine the effects of concentrate energy source on the voluntary food intake and animal performance of 50 lactating dairy cows offered a diverse range of grass silages. The silages were also offered as the sole diet to 10 dairy cows in a partially balanced change-over design experiment. A total of five silages were prepared. Silages A, B and D and silages C and E were harvested from primary regrowths and secondary regrowths respectively of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards. Herbage was ensiled either pre-wilted or unwilted and either untreated or treated with a bacterial inoculant or formic acid based additives. For silages A, B, C, D and E, dry matter (DM) concentrations were 473, 334, 170, 170 and 256 (s.e. 4·0) g/kg, pH values 4·42, 4·01, 4·88, 4·46 and 3·91 (s.e. 0·059), ammonia-nitrogen (N) concentrations 86, 88, 289, 182 and 135 (s.e. 10·6) glkg total N and in vitro DM apparent digestibilities 0·76, 0·76, 0·75, 0·73 and 0·75 (s.e. 0·009) respectively. When offered as the sole diet DM intakes were 14·1,14·7,10·5,10·1 and 11·5 (s.e. 0·50) kg/day. Five concentrates were formulated to contain similar concentrations of crude protein, effective rumen degradable protein (ERDP), metabolizable energy (ME) and fermentable ME (FME) but using different carbohydrate sources to achieve a wide range of starch concentrations. For the low and high starch concentrates, starch concentrations were 50 and 384 g/kg DM, and acid-detergent fibre concentrations were 128 and 75 g/kg DM respectively. The silages were offered ad libitum supplemented with 10 kg concentrate per head per day. For silages A, B, C, D and E silage DM intakes were 10·6, 10·5, 8·5, 8·6 and 9·0 (s.e. 0·37) kg/day and milk yields 23·9, 28·1, 26·2, 26·1 and 25·0 (s.e. 0·76) kg/day respectively. Concentrate energy source did not influence (P > 0·05) silage DM intake, diet apparent digestibility or the yields of milk or fat plus protein. For concentrates containing 50, 131, 209, 310 and 384 g starch per kg DM, milk protein concentrations were 32·0, 32·2, 32·5, 33·0 and 33·6 (s.e. 0·13) glkg, milk fat concentrations were 44·5, 43·9, 43·8, 43·3 and 43·1 (s.e. 0·35) glkg and urinary allantoin concentrations 15·2,15·4, 17·0, 1.7·6 and 18·0 mmolll respectively. Increasing starch intake resulted in positive and negative linear relationships for milk protein (P < 0·01, R2 = 0·96) and fat (P < 0·01, R2 = 0·96) concentrations respectively. There were no significant concentrate energy source × silage type interactions on silage intake or yields of milk or fat plus protein (P > 0·05). However there was a concentrate energy source × silage type interaction on milk fat yield (P > 0·05). It is concluded that, with silages of varying fermentation and intake characteristics but similar apparent digestibility, there were no concentrate energy source × silage type interactions on food intake, milk composition or milk yield. Also concentrate energy source had no effect on silage DM intake or milk yield. However increasing starch intake linearly increased milk protein concentration, probably due to increased microbial protein synthesis and decreased milk fat concentration.

Keywords

concentratesdairy cowsgrass silagemilk compositionmilk production
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 21 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Aston, K., Thomas, C., Daley, S. R. and Sutton, J. D. 1994. Milk production from grass silage diets: effects of the composition of supplementary concentrates. Animal Production 59: 335–344.Google Scholar
Bergmeyer, H. U. and Butler, H. O. 1985. Methods of enzymatic analysis, third edition, vol. 8, pp. 454–461. Verlag Chemie Weinheim, Deerfield Beach/Florida, Basel.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Sutton, J. D. and Bines, J. A. 1979. Concentrate: forage ratios for high yielding dairy cows. In Recent advances in animal nutrition — 1978 (ed. Haresign, W. and Lewis, D.), pp. 99–126. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Burgess, P. L., Muller, L. D., Varga, G. A. and Griel, L. C. 1987. Addition of calcium salts of fatty acids to rations varying in neutral detergent fibre content for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 70: (supplement) 220 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Butler, T. M. 1973. A comparison between concentrates containing barley-soyabean meal and dried molassed beet pulp-groundnut meal for milk production. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 12: 329–331.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E., Gill, M. S. and Watson, J. N. 1981. Silage and milk production: a comparison between barley and dried sugar-beet pulp as silage supplements. Grass and Forage Science 36: 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Thomas, P. C., Wilson, W. D., Kassem, M. E. and Robertson, S. 1984. The influence of the type of carbohydrate in the supplementary concentrate on the utilisation of silage diets for milk production. Proceedings of the seventh silage conference, Belfast, p. 18.Google Scholar
Chen, X. B., Grubic, G., Ørskov, E. R. and Osuji, P. 1992. Effect of feeding frequency on diurnal variation in plasma and urinary purine derivatives in steers. Animal Production 55: 185–191.Google Scholar
Chen, X. B., Hovell, F. D. DeB., Ørskov, E. R. and Brown, D. S. 1990a. Excretion of purine derivatives by ruminants: effect of exogenous nucleic acid supply on purine derivative excretion by sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 63: 131–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X. B., Ørskov, E. R. and Hovell, F. D. DeB. 1990b. Excretion of purine derivatives by ruminants: endogenous excretion, differences between cattle and sheep. British Journal ofNutrition 63: 121–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cushnahan, A. and Gordon, F. J. 1995. The effects of grass preservation on intake, apparent digestibility and rumen degradation characteristics. Animal Science 60: 429–438.Google Scholar
DePeters, E. J. and Cant, J. P. 1992. Nutritional factors influencing the nitrogen composition of bovine milk: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 2043–2070.Google Scholar
Doherty, J. G. and Mayne, C. S. 1996. The effect of concentrate type and supplementary lactic acid or soya oil on milk production characteristics in dairy cows offered grass silages of contrasting fermentation type. Animal Science 62: 187–198.Google Scholar
Dowman, M. G. and Collins, F. C. 1982. The use of enzymes to predict the digestibility of animal feeds, journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 33: 689–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, J. M., Jackson, D. A., Johnson, C. L., Stockill, P. and Hoyle, B. S. 1986. A method for the automatic monitoring of food intake and feed behaviour of individual cattle kept in groups. Research and Development in Agriculture 3: 175–180.Google Scholar
Goering, H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agricultural handbook no. 379, Agricultural Service, USDA, Washington DC, pp. 11–12.Google Scholar
Gonda, H. L. and Lindberg, J. E. 1994. Evaluation of dietary nitrogen utilisation in dairy cows based on urea concentrations in blood, urine and milk, and on urinary concentration of purine derivatives. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 44: 236–245.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J., Porter, M. G., Mayne, C. S., Unsworth, E. F. and Kilpatrick, D. J. 1995. Effect of forage digestibility and type of concentrate on nutrient utilisation by lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Research 62: 15–27.Google Scholar
Huhtanen, P. 1987. The effect of dietary inclusion of barley, unmolassed sugar beet pulp and molasses on milk production, digestibility and digesta passage in dairy cows given silage based diets. Journal of Agricultural Science Finland 59: 101–120.Google Scholar
Huhtanen, P., Jaakkola, S. and Saarisalo, E. 1995. The effects of concentrate energy source on the milk production of dairy cows given a grass silage-based diet. Animal Production 60: 31–40.Google Scholar
Ready, T. W. J., Steen, R. W. J., Kilpatrick, D. J. and Mayne, C. S. 1994. Effects of inoculant treatment on silage fermentation, digestibility and intake by growing cattle. Grass and Forage Science 49: 284–294.Google Scholar
Keppler, D. and Decker, K. 1974. In Methods of enzymatic analysis, second edition (ed. Bergmeyer, H. U.), vol. 3, p. 1127–1131. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, Academic Press Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Lindberg, J. E., Bristav, H. and Manyenga, A. R. 1989. Excretion of purines in the urine of sheep in relation to duodenal flow of microbial protein. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 19: 45–52.Google Scholar
Ling, E. R. 1963. A textbook of dairy chemistry, vol. 2, pp. 85–86. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
McMurray, C. H., Blanchflower, W. J. and Rice, D. A. 1984. Automated kinetic method for D-3-hydroxybutyrate in plasmas or serum. Clinical Chemistry 30: 421–425.Google Scholar
Mayne, C. S., Agnew, R. E., Patterson, D. C., Steen, R. W. J., Gordon, F. J., Kilpatrick, D. J. and Unsworth, E. F. 1995. An examination of possible interactions between silage type and concentrate composition on the intake characteristics of grass silage offered to growing cattle and dairy cows. Animal Science 60: 514–515 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Mayne, C. S. and Gordon, F. J. 1984. The effect of type of concentrate and level of concentrate feeding on milk production. Animal Production 39: 65–76.Google Scholar
Mehrez, A. Z. and Ørskov, E. R. 1977. A study of the artificial fibre bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88: 645–650.Google Scholar
Mertens, D. R. and Loften, J. R. 1980. The effect of starch on forage fibre digestion kinetics in vitro. Journal of Dairy Science 63: 1437–1446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Kiely, P. 1989. Deterioration of silage at feeding time. In Farm andfood research, April 1989, pp. 4–5. Teagasc, Dublin.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Hughes-Jones, M. and McDonald, I. 1981. Degradability of protein supplements and utilisation of undegraded protein by high producing dairy cows. In Recent developments in ruminant nutrition (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 17–30. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Park, R. S., Gordon, F. J., Agnew, R. E., Barnes, R. J. and Steen, R. W. J. 1997. The use of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy on dried samples to predict biological parameters of grass silage. Animal Food Science and Technology In press.Google Scholar
Phipps, R. H., Sutton, J. D., Weller, R. F. and Bines, J. A. 1987. The effect of concentrate composition and method of silage feeding on intake and performance of lactating cows. Journal ofAgricultural Science, Cambridge 109: 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, P. 1986. A new method of analysis of feedingstuffs for the determination of crude oil and fats. In Recent advances in animal nutrition, pp. 77–81. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, B. K., Rowlinson, P. and Armstrong, D. G. 1987. A note on concentrate energy source for dairy cows in mid lactation. Animal Production 45: 321–323.Google Scholar
Sloan, B. K., Rowlinson, P. and Armstrong, D. G. 1988. Milk production in early lactation dairy cows given grass silage ad libitum: influence of concentrate energy source, crude protein content and level of concentrate feeding. Animal Production 46: 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, R. W. J., Gordon, F. J., Mayne, C. S., Poots, R. E., Kilpatrick, D. J., Unsworth, E. F., Barnes, R. J., Porter, M. G. and Pippard, C. J. 1995. Prediction of the intake of grass silage by cattle. In ecent advances in animal nutrition — 1995 (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 67–89. Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D. 1984. Feeding and milk fat production. In Milk compositional quality and its importance in future markets (ed. Castle, M. and Gunn, R. G.). Occasional publication, British Society ofAnimal Production, no. 9, pp. 43–52.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Aston, K., Daley, S. R. and Bass, J. 1986. Milk production from silage. 4. The effect of the composition of the supplement. Animal Production 42: 315–325.Google Scholar