Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:33:02.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of amount offered and chopping on intake and selection of sorghum stover by Ethiopian sheep and cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

E. L. K. Osafo ,
E. Owen ,
A. N. Said ,
M. Gill  and
J. Sherington
E. L. K. Osafo
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, PO Box 236, Reading RG6 6 AT
E. Owen
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, PO Box 236, Reading RG6 6 AT
A. N. Said
Affiliation:
International Livestock Centre for Africa, PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
M. Gill
Affiliation:
Natural Resources International, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Chatham ME4 4TB
J. Sherington
Affiliation:
International Livestock Centre for Africa, PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Get access

Abstract

Experiment 1, with rams (17·0 kg initial weight (M)), and experiment 2, with steers (203 kg M), involved 2 × 2 arrangements of treatments to compare the effect of doubling the amount of stover offered (25 or 50 g/kg M daily) and chopping (unchopped or chopped), upon intake, selection and live-weight change. The stover used was a non-bird-resistant, local variety (Dinkamash). The particle length distribution of the chopped stover (produced by a tractor-driven chaff cutter) was: <4·5 mm, 0·148; 4·5 to 8 mm, 0·157; 8 to 12 mm, 0·181; 12 to 20 mm, 0·269; 20 to 33 mm, 0·168; 33 to 54 mm, 0·040; 54 to 90 mm, 0·003; >90mm, 0·034. The stover was supplemented with minerals and cottonseed cake (sheep, 0·1 kg dry matter (DM) per day; cattle, 0·76 kg DM per day). Experiment 1, over 56 days, involved 48 Menz Highland, 18-month-old, rams, with four replicate pens containing three rams. Experiment 2, over 49 days, used 32, individually penned, Friesian × zebu yearling steers. With rams, doubling the amount offered and chopping increased intake, and the effects were additive (unchopped: 0·98 v. 2·24; chopped: 1·08 v. 1·60 (s.e. 0·071) kg DM per pen per day). With steers, there was an amount × chopping interaction (P < 0·05) (unchopped: 3·7 v. 4·7 chopped: 3·6 v. 3·9 (s.e. 0·16) kg DM per day), with chopping reducing intake of stover offered at 50 g/kg M per day. Increased intakes were associated with increased growth rate. In both experiments refused stover contained less leaf-plus-sheath than offered stover but the difference was more pronounced in rams compared with steers indicating the superior selective ability of the rams. In rams offered unchopped stover, the increase in stover intake with increasing amount offered was accounted for by a proportional 1·03 unit increase in consumption of leaf-plus-sheath and a 0·06 unit reduction in intake of stem. Doubling the amount of unchopped stover offered increased intake of both rams and steers by 0·27 unit. Chopping stover was clearly beneficial for rams but not for steers. Doubling the amount of stover offered is a simple excess-feeding strategy to apply. Excess feeding also increases the proportion of stover refused from about 0·2 to 0·5, thus generating an uneaten residue available for other purposes, e.g. mulch or compost.

Keywords

food intakesheepsorghum stoversteers
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , August 1997 , pp. 55 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboud, A. A. O. 1991. Strategies for utilization of sorghum stover as feed for cattle, sheep and goats. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Reading.Google Scholar
Aboud, A. A. O., Owen, E., Reed, J. D., Said, A. N. and McAllan, A. B. 1991. Feeding sorghum stover to Ethiopian goats and sheep: effect of amount offered on growth, intake and selection. Animal Production 52: 607 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Aboud, A. A. O., Owen, E., Said, A. N., Gill, M. and McAllan, A. B. 1993. Feeding sorghum stover to Ethiopian goats and sheep: effect of amount offered on intake, selection and performance. In Animal production in developing countries (ed. Gill, M., Owen, E., Pollott, G. E. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), British Society of Animal Production occasional publication no. 16, pp. 202–203.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The nutritional requirements of ruminant livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1984. The nutritional requirements of ruminant livestock. Supplement no. 1. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Alhassan, W. S., Obilana, A. B. and Beko, S. A. 1987. Yield and potential feeding value of straws of grain sorghum cultivars developed in Nigeria. Animal Feed Science and Technology 17: 285–293.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. Official methods of analysis. 14th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bationo, A., Buekert, A., Sedogo, M. P., Christianson, B. C. and Mokwunye, A. U. 1995. A critical review of crop-residue use as soil amendment in West African semi-arid tropics. In Livestock and sustainable nutrient cycling in mixed farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa (ed. Powell, J. M., Fernandez-Rivera, S., Williams, T. O. and Renard, C.), proceedings of an international conference held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 22-26 November 1993, pp. 305–322. ILCA (International Livestock Centre for Africa), Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Bhargava, P. K., Orskov, E. R. and Walli, T. K. 1988. Rumen degradation of straw. 4. Selection and degradation of morphological components of barley straw by sheep. Animal Production 47:105–110.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Wainman, F. W. and Wilson, R. S. 1961. The regulation of food intake by sheep. Animal Production 3: 51–62.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C. and Milne, J. A. 1972. The nutritive value of processed roughages for milking cattle. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production, pp. 53–60.Google Scholar
Fernández-Gonzales, E. 1981. Effects of treatment with NaOH on digestibility and intake by lambs of barley straw chopped to different lengths and treated for different lengths of time. 2: Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B 51: 420 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Fernandez-Rivera, S., Midou, A. and Marichatou, H. 1994. Effect of food allowance on diet selectivity and intake of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) stover leaves by sheep. Animal Production 58:249–256.Google Scholar
Flachowsky, G., Tiroke, K. and Schein, G. 1991. Botanical fractions of straw of 51 cereal varieties and in sacco degradation of various fractions. Animal Teed Science and Technology 34:279–289.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization. 1995. Production yearbook 1994. FAO Statistics Series 125, vol. 48, pp. 84–85. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
Gale, G. E. and O'Dogherty, M. J. 1982. An apparatus for the assessment of the length distribution of chopped forage. Journal of Agricultural Engineering and Research 27: 35–43.Google Scholar
Goering, H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fibre analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agriculture handbook, US Department of Agriculture, no. 379.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. and Wainman, F. W. 1972. The nutritive value of processed roughages for fattening sheep and cattle. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production, pp. 61–72.Google Scholar
Hossain, M. M. and Owen, E. 1992. Concentrate-substitution effect on straw intake in goats. In Recent advances in goat production. Proceedings of and papers presented at the fifth international conference on goats held in New Delhi (ed. Lokeshwar, R. R.), pp. 847–849. Fifth International Conference on Goats, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 1990. Formulation of response strategies. Report prepared for Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) by working group III. WMO and UNEP, Geneva.Google Scholar
Kabatange, M. A. and Kitalyi, A. J. 1989. Livestock feeding in the semi-arid areas of central Tanzania; potentials, constraints and possible improvements. In Overcoming constraints to the efficient utilization of agricultural by-products as animal feed (ed. Said, A. N. and Dzowela, D. H.), Proceedings of the fourth annual workshop of the African Research Network for Agricultural By-products (ARNAB), 20-27 October, 1987, pp. 232–238. ARNAB, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Kitalyi, A. J. 1993. Sorghum stover and lablab bean haulm for dry-season feeding of lactating cattle in semi-arid central Tanzania. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Reading.Google Scholar
Odoi, F. N. A. and Owen, E. 1993. Encouraging store lambs to eat barley straw at housing: influence upon intake of pen to pen visibility and number of lambs per pen. Animal Production 56: 455 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Olayiwole, M. B. and Olorunju, S. A. 1987. Feedlot performance of yearling steers previously maintained on different crop residues/supplementation regimes. In Utilization of agricultural by-products as livestock feed in Africa (ed. Little, D. A. and Said, A. N.), proceedings of a workshop held at Blantyre, Malawi, September 1986, pp. 72–82. ILCA (International Livestock Centre for Africa), Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Osafo, E. L. K. 1993. Sorghum stover as a forage: cultivar effects on yield and effects of chopping, amount offered, supplementation and variety on intake, selection and live-weight gain in Ethiopian sheep and cattle. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Reading.Google Scholar
Osuji, P. O., Sibanda, S. and Nsahlai, I. V. 1993. Supplementation of maize stover for Ethiopian Menz sheep: effects of cottonseed, noug (Guizotia abyssinica) or sunflower cake with or without maize on the intake, growth, apparent digestibility, nitrogen balance and excretion of purine derivatives. Animal Production 57: 429–436.Google Scholar
Owen, E. 1978. Processing of roughages. In Recent advances in animal nutrition—1978 (ed. Haresign, W. and Lewis, D.), pp. 127–148. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Owen, E. and Jayasuriya, M. C. N. 1989. Recent developments in chemical treatment of roughages and their relevance to animal production in developing countries. In Feeding strategies for improving productivity of ruminant livestock in developing countries, pp. 205–230. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.Google Scholar
Reed, J. D., Tedla, A. and Kebede, Y. 1987. Phenolics, fibre and fibre digestibility in the crop residue from bird resistant and non-bird resistant sorghum varieties. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 39: 113–121.Google Scholar
Saadullah, M. and Siriwardene, J. A. de S. 1993. Reasons for success and failure of straw treatment and straw feeding in Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. In Feeding of ruminants on fibrous crop residues. Aspects of treatment, feeding, nutrient evaluation, research and extension (ed. Singh, K. and Schiere, J. B.), proceedings of an international workshop held at the National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal (Haryana — India), February 4-8, 1991, pp. 277–288. Indo-Dutch project on bioconversion of crop residues. Agricultural University, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Schiere, J. B. and Ibrahim, M. N. M. 1989. Feeding of urea-ammonia treated rice straw. A compilation of miscellaneous reports produced by the straw utilization project (Sri Lanka). Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Singh, M., Kumar, M. N. A., Rai, S. N. and Pradan, P. K, 1993. Urea-ammonia treatment of straw under village conditions. Reasons for success and failure. In Feeding of ruminants on fibrous crop residues. Aspects of treatment, feeding, nutrient evaluation, research and extension (ed. Singh, K. and Schiere, J. B.), proceedings of an international workshop held at the National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal (Haryana — India), February 4-8,1991, pp. 289–296. Indo-Dutch project on bioconversion of crop residues. Agricultural University, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1987. Procedures guide for personal computers, version 6 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. C., Holden, S. J., Winugroho, M., Owen, E. and Gill, M. 1995. Feeding livestock for compost production; a strategy for sustainable upland agriculture on Java. In Livestock and sustainable nutrient cycling in mixed farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa. Volume II: technical papers (ed. Powell, J. M., Fernandez-Rivera, S., Williams, T. O. and Renard, C.), proceedings of an international conference held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 22-26 November 1993, pp. 115–128. ILCA (International Livestock Centre for Africa), Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Wahed, R. A. 1987. Stall-feeding barley straw to goats: the effect of refusal-rate allowance on voluntary intake and selection. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Reading.Google Scholar
Wahed, R. A., Owen, E., Naate, M. and Hosking, B. J. 1990. Feeding straw to small ruminants: effect of amount offered on intake and selection of barley straw by goats and sheep. Animal Production 51: 283–289.Google Scholar
Walker, H. G. 1984. Physical treatment. In Straw and other fibrous by-products as feed (ed. Sundstøl, F. and Owen, E.), pp. 79–105. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar