Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:12:41.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of supplementary crude protein level and degradability in grass silage-based diets on performance of dairy cows, and digestibility and abomasal nitrogen flow in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. F. Cody
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4
J. J. Murphy
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Dairy Husbandry Department, Moorepark Development Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork
D. J. Morgan
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4
Get access

Abstract

Four concentrate supplements differing in crude protein (CP) and undegradable protein (UDP) content were offered to 16 lactating Friesian cows together with grass silage (dry matter (DM) 196 g/kg, pH 4·38, CP 160 g/kg DM, in vitro DM digestibility 0·68) ad libitum in a Latin-square trial with 3-week periods. The supplement treatments were: (1) barley 122 g CP per kg DM, degradability (dg) 0·77; (2) barley/soya-bean meal 210 g CP per kg DM, dg 0·69; (3) barley/soya-bean meal/fish meal 190 g CP per kg DM, dg 0·61; (4) barley/soya-bean meal/fish meal 219 g CP per kg DM, dg 0·59. Supplements were given at 8 kg/day. Total daily intakes of silage (kg DM), CP and UDP (g) on treatments 1 to 4 were 7·77, 2087, 375; 8·35, 2804, 655; 8·29, 2676, 717; 8·70, 2917, 826, respectively. Milk yield (kg/day) and yields of fat, protein and lactose (g/day) on the four treatments were 21·3, 791, 617, 984; 23·0, 816, 688, 1055; 23·0, 818, 696, 1050; 23·6, 813, 735, 1071 for treatments 1 to 4 respectively. Yield and concentration of protein and lactose were significantly lower on treatment 1 than on the other treatments, while the of blood metabolites indicated treatment effects on blood glucose, non-esterified fatty acids, plasma protein and urea. Digestibility of organic matter and non-ammonia nitrogen (NAN) flow to the abomasum (g/day), measured in sheep given a fixed silage/supplement ratio at maintenance, were 0·81 and 18·4, 0·81 and 20·8, 0·82 and 21·4, 0·82 and 22·4 for treatments 1 to 4 respectively. The NAN flow was significantly greater on treatment 4 than on treatment 1.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1984. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Suppl. No. 1. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Allison, M. J. 1969. Biosynthesis of amino acids by ruminal micro-organisms. Journal of Animal Science 29: 797807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. Official Methods of Analysis. 14th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Virginia.Google Scholar
Butlkr, T. M., Gleeson, P. A. and Morgan, D. J. 1983. Effect of supplement feeding level and crude protein content of the supplement on the performance of spring-calving dairy cows. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 22: 6978.Google Scholar
Chaney, A. L. and Marbach, E. P. 1962. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clinical Chemistry 8: 130132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clancy, M. J. and Wilson, R. K. 1966. Development and application of a new chemical method for predicting the digestibilities and intakes of herbage samples. Proceedings of the 10th International Grassland Congress, Helsinki, pp. 445453.Google Scholar
Collins, J. D. and Kelly, N. R. 1977. The haematology and clinical biochemistry of domesticated animals. The use of the International (SI) System of Units. Irish Veterinary Journal 31: 127133.Google Scholar
De boer, G., Murphy, J. J. and Kennelly, J. J. 1987. A modified method for determination of in situ rumen degradation of feedstuffs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 67: 93102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-shazly, K., Dehority, B. A. and Johnson, R. R. 1961. Effect of starch on the digestion of cellulose in vitro and in vivo by rumen microorganisms. Journal of Animal Science 20: 268273.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. P., Field, A. C. and Wiener, G. 1987. Concentrations of blood constituents in genetically high and low milk-production lines of British Friesian and Jersey cattle around calving and in early lactation. Animal Production 44: 183199.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. and McMurray, C. H. 1979. The optimum level of protein in the supplement for dairy cows with access to grass silage. Animal Production 29: 283291.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J., Unsworth, E. F. and Peoples, A. C. 1981. Protein supplementation of silage-based diets for milk production. 54th Annual Report, Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, pp. 1323.Google Scholar
Hibbitt, K. G. 1984. Effect of protein on the health of dairy cows. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition — 1984 (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 189200. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, W. 1977. Calculation of protein requirements for dairy cows according to measurements of N metabolism and nutrition. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition (ed. Tamminga, S.), Publ, European Association for Animal Production, No. 22, Wageningen, pp. 130132.Google Scholar
McDonald, P. 1981. The Biochemistry of Silage. John Wiley. Chichester.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1984. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Reference Book 433. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1986. Feed Composition. UK Tables of Feed Composition and Nutritive Value for Ruminants. MAFF Standing Committee on Tables of Feed Composition. Chalcombe Publications.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. J., Gleeson, P. A. and Morgan, D. J. 1985. Effect of protein source in the concentrate on the performance of cows offered grass silage ad-libitum. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 24: 151159.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. J., Kennelly, J. J. and Shelford, J. A. 1986. Effect of level of undegradable protein in the diet on the performance of lactating cows fed grass silage ad-libitum. 65th Annual Feeders Day Report, University of Alberta, pp. 8798.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1985. Ruminant Nitrogen Usage. National Academy Press, Washington.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Grubb, D. A., Wenham, G. and Corrigall, W. 1979. The sustenance of growing and fattening ruminants by intragastric infusion of volatile fatty acid and protein. British Journal of Nutrition 41: 553558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 499503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, K. A., Stern, M. D. and Satter, L. D. 1984. Protein degradation in the rumen and amino acid absorption in the small intestine of lactating dairy cattle fed various protein sources. Journal of Animal Science 58: 244255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siddons, R. C., Paradine, J., Beever, D. E. and Cornell, P. R. 1985. Ytterbium acetate as a particulate-phase digesta-flow marker. British Journal of Nutrition 54: 509519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, C. and Rae, R. C. 1988. Concentrate supplementation of silage for dairy cows. In Nutrition and Lactation in the Dairy Cow (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C.), pp. 327354. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18: 104111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topps, J. H. and Thompson, J. K. 1984. An Appraisal of the Relationships Between Blood Characteristics (and other in vivo parameters) and the Nutritional Status of Farm Ruminants. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, H. F. and Reid, J. T. 1965. Prediction of the energy value of cow's milk. Journal of Dairy Science 48: 12151223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verite, R., Journet, M. and Jarrige, R. 1979. A new system for the protein feeding of ruminants: the PDI system. Livestock Production Science 6: 349367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar