Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:20:17.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of proportion of cell-wall material from lucerne leaf meal on apparent digestibility, rate of passage and gut characteristics in pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

K. K. Kuan ,
G. Stanogias  and
A. C. Dunkin
K. K. Kuan
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
G. Stanogias
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
A. C. Dunkin
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Metabolism trials were conducted with entire male pigs (average initial weight 44·4 ± 0·2 kg) to determine the apparent digestibility of the major chemical components of diets containing 0·05, 0·10, 0·15 and 0·20 cell-wall material (determined as neutral detergent fibre) from lucerne leaf meal, when added to a constant daily allowance of a semi-synthetic basal diet. Concurrent rate of passage studies were also carried out.

Increasing the proportion of cell-wall material in the diet resulted in a linear decrease in the apparent digestibility of dry matter, crude protein and ether extract and the apparent digestibility and metabolizability of gross energy. Daily nitrogen retention (g) increased linearly with an increasing proportion of cell-wall material in the diet. Coefficients of apparent digestibility and cell-wall material fractions did not differ significantly with changes in the dietary proportions.

Although the rate of passage of digesta was slower (F < 0·001) in animals fed the diets containing 0·05 and 0·10 cell-wall material than in those fed the two diets with higher proportions, it did not appear to be a major factor contributing to the observed decline in the apparent digestibility of dietary chemical components as the proportion was raised.

Increase in dietary proportion of cell wall material was associated with marked linear increase in weight and/or length of various segments of the gastro-intestinal tract.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , April 1983 , pp. 201 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ademosun, A. A. 1976. The effect of energy dilution on feed utilization and carcass quality of finishing pigs. Nutr. Rep. Int. 13: 449–461.Google Scholar
Association of Official analytical chemists. 1970. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 11th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bowland, J. P., Bickel, H., Pfirter, H. P., Wenk, C. P. and Schürch, A. 1970. Respiration calorimetry studies with growing pigs fed diets containing from three to twelve percent crude fiber. J. Anim. Sci. 31: 494–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castle, Elizabeth J. and Castle, M. E. 1956. The rate of passage of food through the alimentary tract of pigs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 47: 196–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, Elizabeth J. and Castle, M. E. 1957. Further studies of the rate of passage of food through the alimentary tract of pigs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 49: 106–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, E. W. and Harris, L. E. 1969. Applied Animal Nutrition: the Use of Feedstuffs in the Formulation of Livestock Rations. 2nd ed. Freeman. San Francisco.Google Scholar
Entringer, R. P., Plumlee, M. P., Conrad, J. H., Cline, T. R. and Wolfe, , Shirley, . 1975. Influence of diet on passage rate and apparent digestibility by growing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 40: 486–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrell, D. J. 1973. Digestibility by pigs of the major chemical components of diets high in plant cell-wall constituents. Anim. Prod. 16: 43–47.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. F. and Crofts, R. M. J. 1977. The protein-sparing effect of carbohydrate. 1. Nitrogen retention of growing pigs in relation to diet. Br. J. Nutr. 38: 479–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goering, H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). U.S Dep. Agric, Agric. Handb. No. 379.Google Scholar
Kass, Maria L., Van Soest, P. J., Pond, W. G., Lewis, Bertha and Mcdowell, R. E. 1980. Utilization of dietary fiber from alfalfa by growing swine. 1. Apparent digestibility of diet components in specific segments of the gastrointestinal tract. J. Anim. Sci. 50: 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keys, J. E. JR, and Debarthe, J. V. 1974. Cellulose and hemicellulose digestibility in the stomach, small intestine and large intestine of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 39: 53–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KEYS, J. E. JR, Van Soest, P. J. and Young, E. P. 1969. Comparative study of the digestibility of forage cellulose and hemicellulose in ruminants and nonruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 29: 11–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keys, J. E. JR, Van Soest, P. J. and Young, E. P. 1970. Effect of increasing dietary cell wall content on the digestibility of hemicellulose and cellulose in swine and rats. J. Anim. Sci. 31: 1172–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. H. and Taverner, M. R. 1975. Prediction of the digestible energy in pig diets from analyses of fibre contents. Anim. Prod. 21: 275–284.Google Scholar
Kornegay, E. T. 1978. Feeding value and digestibility of soybean hulls for swine. J. Anim. Sci. 47: 1272–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pond, W. G., Yen, J. T., Lindvall, R. N. and Hill, Dale. 1981. Dietary alfalfa meal for genetically obese and lean growing pigs: effect on body weight gain and on carcass and gastrointestinal tract measurements and blood metabolites. J. Anim. Sci. 51: 367–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seerley, R. W., Miller, E. R. and Hoefer, J. A. 1962. Rate of food passage studies with pigs equally and ad libitum fed meal and pellets. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 834–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1969. Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Teague, H. S. and Hanson, L. E. 1954. The effect of feeding different levels of a cellulosic material to swine. J. Anim. Sci. 13: 206–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. 1963. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin. J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 46: 829–835.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P J. 1967. Development of a comprehensive system of feed analyses and its application to forages. J. Anim. Sci. 26: 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. and Moore, L. A. 1965. New chemical methods for analysis of forages for the purpose of predicting nutritive value. Proc. 9th int. Grassld Congr., Sao Paulo, Brazil, pp. 783–789.Google Scholar
Whiting, F. and Bezeau, L. M. 1957. The metabolic fecal nitrogen excretion of the pig as influenced by the amount of fibre in the ration and by body weight. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 37: 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E. and Evans, R. E. 1947. The nutritive value of fodder cellulose from wheat straw. 1. Its digestibility and feeding value when fed to ruminants and pigs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 37: 202–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar