Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:15:06.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of photoperiod and light intensity on the performance of intact male turkeys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. D. Lewis ,
G. C. Perry  and
C. M. Sherwin
P. D. Lewis
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU
G. C. Perry
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU
C. M. Sherwin
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU
Get access

Abstract

Injurious pecking can be a major cause of mortality in growing turkeys, particularly if given a long photoperiod. Consequently, birds are usually reared under low light intensity (<1 lux) and/or have their beaks trimmed. The influence of an 8, 12, 16 or 23 h photoperiod at an intensity of 1 or 10 lux on the performance of intact (not beak trimmed or de-snooded) BUT8 male turkeys was assessed in a 4 X2 empirical study.

Excessive injurious pecking in groups exposed to 10 lux light intensity on >12 h photoperiods necessitated an unscheduled reduction to 1 lux light intensity. Overall, light intensity did not significantly affect food intake, food conversion efficiency, growth or carcass composition. Groups exposed to 10 lux light intensity for all or part of the trial had higher losses and a greater incidence of pecking than birds maintained on al lux light intensity.

Growth was inconsistently affected by photoperiod, with birds on 12 h having the highest body weight at 108 days but no significant differences at 136 days. Patterns of food intake were variable but cumulatively to 136 days food intake was not significantly affected by daylength. Overall, but particularly after 108 days, birds on longer photoperiods converted food more efficiently. Mortality and the incidence of injurious pecking was positively correlated with photoperiod and breast meat yield and testicular weight were greater in birds on longer daylengths. There were no significant interactions between photoperiod and illuminance.

Keywords

light intensityphotoperiodturkeys
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , June 1998 , pp. 759 - 767
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auckland, J. N. 1973. Effect of lighting period on the performance of male turkeys from 6 to 18 weeks of age. British Poultry Science 14: 621–622.Google Scholar
Auckland, J. N. 1978a. The effect of photoperiod on performance of male turkeys from 2 to 15 weeks of age. British Poultry Science 19: 35–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auckland, J. N. 1978b. The effect of photoperiod on performance of female turkeys from 2 to 16 weeks of age. British Poultry Science 19: 691–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, W. L. and Touchburn, S. P. 1976. Effect of light intensity on confinement rearing of male turkeys. Poultry Science 55: 999–1007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakely, R. M. and MacGregor, H. I. 1963. The effect of length of day and temperature on the disposition of subcutaneous fat by market turkeys. Canadian Journal Animal Science 43: 332–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. S. and Siopes, T. D. 1985. The effect of light duration on turkey poult performance and adrenal function. Poultry Science 64: 995–1001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, G. S., Siopes, T. D., Peiffer, R. L. and Cook, C. 1986. Morphologic changes induced by photoperiod in eyes of turkey poults. American Journal of Veterinary Research 47: 953–955.Google Scholar
Hester, P. Y., Elkin, R. G. and Klingensmith, P. M. 1983. Effects of high intensity step-up and low intensity stepdown lighting programs on the incidence of leg abnormalities in turkeys. Poultry Science 62: 887–896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hester, P. Y., Sutton, A. L., Elkin, R. G. and Klingensmith, P. M. 1985. The effect of lighting, dietary amino acids, and litter on the incidence of leg abnormalities and performance of turkey toms. Poultry Science 64: 2062–2075.Google Scholar
Ivaschenko, V. P. and Alekseev, F. F. 1974. The effects of light day length and light intensity on turkey broilers of the North Caucasian breed. Proceedings and abstracts of the XV world's poultry congress, New Orleans, p. 421.Google Scholar
McCartney, M. G. 1956. The effect of daylength on rate of growth, feed conversion, feathering and market quality of turkeys. Poultry Science 35: 468–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milby, T. T. and Thompson, R. B. 1941. The use of all-night lights for growing turkeys. Poultry Science 20: 332–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newberry, R. C. 1992. Influence of increasing photoperiod and toe clipping on breast buttons of turkeys. Poultry Science 71: 1471–1479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peng, I. C., Adams, R. L., Furumoto, E. J., Hester, P. Y., Larson, J. E., Pike, O. A. and Stadelman, W. J. 1985. Allometric growth patterns and meat yields of carcass parts of turkey toms as influenced by lighting programs and age. Poultry Science 64: 871–876.Google Scholar
Proudfoot, F. G., Hulan, H. W. and Dewitt, W. F. 1979. Response of turkey broilers to different stocking densities, lighting treatments, toe clipping and intermingling of the sexes. Poultry Science 58: 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoffner, R. N., Polley, C. R., Burger, R. E. and Johnson, E. L. 1962. Light regulation in turkey management. 1. Effect on body weight. Poultry Science 41: 1560–1562.Google Scholar
Siopes, T. D. 1994. Critical day lengths for egg production and photorefractoriness in the domestic turkey. Poultry Science 73: 1906–1913.Google Scholar
Siopes, T. D., Baughman, G. R. and Parkhurst, C. R. 1993. Photoperiod and seasonal influences on the growth of turkey hens. British Poultry Science 34: 43–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siopes, T. D., Baughman, G. R., Parkhurst, C. R. and Timmons, M. B. 1989. Relationship between duration and intensity of environmental light on the growth performance of male turkeys. Poultry Science 68: 1428–1435.Google Scholar
Siopes, T. D., Timmons, M. B., Baughman, G. R. and Parkhurst, C. R. 1983a. The effect of light intensity on the growth performance of male turkeys. Poultry Science 62: 2336–2342.Google Scholar
Siopes, T. D., Timmons, M. B., Baughman, G. R. and Parkhurst, C. R. 1983b. The effect of light intensity on turkey poult eye morphology. Poultry Science 62: 2486–2488.Google Scholar
Siopes, T. D., Timmons, M. B., Baughman, G. R. and Parkhurst, C. R. 1984. The effects of light intensity on turkey poult performance, eye morphology, and adrenal weight. Poultry Science 63: 904–909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Touchburn, S., Bacon, W. and Topscher, M. 1970. The effect of light intensity and dietary fat on the growth performance of turkeys. Proceedings of the XIV world's poultry congress, Madrid, pp. 999–1005.Google Scholar