Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:14:59.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of pattern of food supply on performance, compensatory growth and carcass composition of Beulah and Welsh Mountain lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. R. Iason ,
A. R. Mantecon ,
J. A. Milne ,
D. A. Sim ,
A. D. M. Smith  and
I. R. White
G. R. Iason
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QS
A. R. Mantecon
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QS
J. A. Milne
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QS
D. A. Sim
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QS
A. D. M. Smith
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QS
I. R. White
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QS
Get access

Abstract

Seventy-eight Beulah (BH) and 78 Welsh Mountain (WM) wether lambs (mature live weights (MLW) 60 and 70 kg respectively), were used to investigate genotypic differences in performance and compensatory growth during the post-weaning period. After an initial slaughter of 12 of each breed, a complete straw-based pelleted diet (122 g crude protein and 10·4 Mj metabolizable energy per kg dry matter (DM)) was offered ad libitum to a further 29 of each which were slaughtered at a range of live weights between proportionately 0·35 andl -00 of ML W. As well as these groups undergoing normal growth (NG), the remaining lambs were given the same diet at a level sufficient to maintain constant live weight (LW) for 3 months. Eight of each breed were then slaughtered and the remaining 29 of each offered the diet ad libitum for a period of post-restricted growth (PRG); these 29 were also slaughtered between 0·35 and 1·00 of MLW. During the periods of ad libitum food supply, voluntary food intake was greater in BH than WM lambs (BH: 38·3, WM: 35·3 g DM per kg LW, P < 0·01) and during PRG as compared with NG although this result was due to a response only in WM lambs (NG - BH: 38·0, PRG-BH: 38·5, NG - WM: 33·3, PRG - WM: 37·2 g DM per kg LW, breed × pattern of food supply interaction, P < 0·05). Daily live-weight gain (LWG) was greater during PRG than NG in both breeds (NG: 3·15, PRG: 4·80 g/kg LWper day, P < 0·05). This effect was greatest in the first 8 weeks of growth but persisted into the period 16 weeks to maturity. WM lambs had overall slightly leaner carcasses and a lower proportion of protein in the fleece-free empty body than BH when compared at the same proportion of MLW; particularly during PRG. The protein in the carcass-weight gain (CWG) was greater in WM lambs during PRG than during NG (NG: 98, PRG: 123 g/kg, P < 0·05), but did not differ significantly in BH (NG: 106, PRG: 118 g/kg). The proportion of fat in CWG was concomitantly smaller during PRG. There are thus breed differences in the performance and carcass composition of lambs during compensatory growth. Genotypes to be finished by continuous feeding or a regimen incorporating food restriction should be carefully chosen for date offinishing in relation to desired carcass composition.

Keywords

carcass compositionfood supplygrowthlambs
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , April 1992 , pp. 235 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Allden, W. G. 1970. The effects of nutritional deprivatio n on the subsequent productivity of sheep and cattle. Nutritional Abstracts and Reviews 40: 1167–1184.Google Scholar
Black, J. L. 1983. Growth and development of lambs. In Sheep production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 21–58. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Burton, J. H., Anderson, M. and Reid, J. T. 1974. Some biological aspects of partial starvation. The effect of weight loss and regrowth on body composition in sheep. British journal of Nutrition 32: 515–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler-Hogg, B. W. 1984a. The growth of Clun and Southdown sheep: body composition and the partitioning of total body fat. Animal Production 39: 405–411.Google Scholar
Butler-Hogg, B. W. 1984b. Growt h patterns in sheep: changes in the chemical composition of the empty body and its constituent part s during weight loss and compensatory growth. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103: 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstens, G. E., Johnson, D. E. and Ellenberger, M. A. 1989. Energy metabolism and composition of gain in beef steers exhibiting normal and compensatory growth. In Energy metabolism of farm animals (ed. Honing, Y. van der and Close, W. H.), proceedings of the 11th symposium, Netherlands, 1983, pp. 131–134.Google Scholar
Demment, M. W. and Van Soest, P. J. 1985. A nutritional explanation for body-size patterns of ruminant and nonruminant herbivores. American Naturalist 125: 641–672.Google Scholar
Derting, T. L. 1989. Metabolism and food availability as regulators of production in juvenile cotton rats. Ecology 70: 587–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, N. McC. and Searle, T. W. 1979. Studies of weaned lambs before, during and after a period of weight loss. I. Energy and nitrogen utilization. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30: 513–523.Google Scholar
Hodge, R. W. and Star, M. 1984. Comparison of the fat status of lambs during continuous growth and following nutritional restriction and subsequent re-alimentation. Australian Journal Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 24: 150–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, T. H. and Russel, A. J. F. 1972. The distribution of body fat in Scottish Blackface and Finnish Landrace lambs. Animal Production 15: 301–306.Google Scholar
McClelland, T. H., Bonaiti, B. and Taylor, St C. S. 1976. Breed differences in body composition of equally mature sheep. Animal Production 23: 281–293.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1989. Lamb carcase production. 2nd ed. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. H. and Clawson, W. J. 1964. Undernutrition and subsequent realimentation in rats and sheep. Journal of Animal Science 23: 214–224.Google Scholar
Murray, D. M. and Slezacek, O. 1980. Growth pattern and its effect on feed utilization of sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95: 349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donovan, P. B. 1984. Compensatory gain in cattle and sheep. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B 54: 389–410.Google Scholar
Searle, T. W. and Griffiths, D. A. 1976. The body composition of growing sheep during milk feeding, and the effect on composition of weaning at various body weights. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86: 483–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. 1980. Live-weight growth from embryo to adult in domesticated mammals. Animal Production 31: 223–235.Google Scholar
Thonney, M. L., Taylor, St C. S. and McClelland, T. H. 1987a. Breed and sex differences in equally mature sheep and goats. 1. Growth and food intake. Animal Production 45: 239–260.Google Scholar
Thonney, M. L., Taylor, St C. S., Murray, J. I. and McClelland, T. H. 1987b. Breed and sex differences in equally mature sheep and goats. 2. Body components at slaughter. Animal Production 45: 261–276.Google Scholar
Thornton, R. F., Hood, R. L., Jones, P. N. and Re, V. M. 1979. Compensatory growth in sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30: 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, W. H., Tulloh, N. M. and Murray, D. M. 1976. The effect of compensatory growth in sheep on empty body weight, carcass weight and the weights of some offals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87: 433–441.Google Scholar
Wright, I. A., Russel, A. J. F. and Hunter, E. A. 1987. The effects of genotype and post-weaning nutrition on compensatory growth in cattle reared as singles or twins. Animal Production 45: 423–432.Google Scholar