Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:07:09.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of natural zeolite on nutrient digestibility, carcass traits and performance of Holstein steers given a diet containing urea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

A. A. Sadeghi  and
P. Shawrang
A. A. Sadeghi*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Science and Research Campus, Islamic Azad University, PO Box 14155, 4933 Tehran, Iran
P. Shawrang
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Tehran University, PO Box 4111, Karaj, Iran
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate effects of natural zeolite (clinoptilolite) on nutrient digestibility, carcass attributes and performance of Holstein steers given a diet containing urea. Forty-five Holstein steers (309 (s.d. 11·2) kg) were given diets as follows: control diet based on maize and soya-bean meal (SBM); treatment 2 (T2), control diet (without SBM) containing 20 g/kg urea; treatment 3 (T3), control diet (without SBM) containing 20 g/kg urea and 30 g/kg zeolite. Just before feeding, ruminal ammonia levels were low in all treatments. At 2·5 h post feeding, steers given T2 and T3 diets had higher ( P<0·05) ruminal ammonia concentration than the control. At 5·5 h post feeding, steers on T3 diet had the highest ruminal ammonia concentration, which was higher ( P<0·05) than the value for steers given T2 diet. Plasma urea nitrogen level increased post feeding for all treatments. At 3 h post feeding, the level for steers given T2 diet was higher ( P<0·05) than those on control and T3 diets but at 6 h post feeding, the level was higher for steers on T3 diet. No differences ( P>0·05) were observed in dry-matter intake among treatments. Live-weight gain and gain: food ratio were highest ( P<0·05) for steers on the control diet, with no differences ( P>0·05) between steers given T2 and T3 diets. Including zeolite in a diet containing urea had no effect ( P>0·05) on total tract digestibility coefficients of dry matter, organic matter and crude protein but increased ( P<0·05) digestibility of neutral-detergent fibre and acid-detergent fibre. Hot carcass weight and kidney, pelvic and heart fat weight of steers were highest in control, intermediate in T3 and least in T2 ( P<0·05). No differences ( P>0·05) were found in longissimus muscle area and fat thickness over longissimus muscle among treatments. Including 30 g/kg of zeolite in a diet containing 20 g/kg of urea decreased ruminal ammonia nitrogen concentration, plasma urea nitrogen level and increased fibre digestibility but its effect on feedlot performance was negligible.

Keywords

intensive husbandrysteersureazeolites
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , April 2006 , pp. 163 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1995. Official methods of analysis, 16th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
Barrer, R. M. 1987. Zeolites and clay minerals as sorbent and molecular sieves. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Blednov, V. A. 1995. Finishing wether sheep with the use of zeolite. Zootechnica 3: 25–31.Google Scholar
Chaney, A. L. and Marbach, E. P. 1962. Modified reagent for determination of urea and ammonia. Clinical Chemistry 8: 130–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. A., Sweeney, T. F. and Muller, L. D. 1988. Effects of feeding synthetic zeolite A and sodium bicarbonate on milk production, nutrient digestion and rate of digesta passage in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 71: 446–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knaus, W. F., Beermann, D. H., Robinson, T. F., Fox, D. G. and Finnerty, K. D. 1998. Effects of a dietary mixture of meat and bone meal, feather meal, blood meal, and fish meal on nitrogen utilization in finishing Holstein steers. Journal of Animal Science 76: 1481–1487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolver, E., Muller, L. D., Varga, G. A. and Cassidy, T. J. 1998. Synchronization of ruminal degradation of supplemental carbohydrate with pasture nitrogen in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 2017–2028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lana, R. P. and Russell, J. B. 1997. Effect of forage quality and monensin on the ruminal fermentation of fistulated cows fed continuously at a constant intake. Journal of Animal Science 75: 224–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCollum, F. T. and Galyean, M. L. 1983. Effects of Clinoptilolite on rumen fermentation, digestion and feedlot performance in beef steers fed high concentrate diets. Journal of Animal Science 56: 517–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, P., Edwards, R. A., Greenhalgh, J. F. D. and Morgan, C. A. 1995. Animal nutrition, fifth edition. Longman, Singapore.Google Scholar
Michael, B. D., Gerasimowicz, W. V., Stockette, M. and Eberl, D. D. 1991. Infrared spectroscopic examination of the interaction of urea with the naturally occurring zeolite clinoptilolite. Microchemical Journal 44: 130–139.Google Scholar
Milton, C. T., Brandt, R. T. and Titgemeyer, E. C. 1997. Effects of dietary nitrogen source and concentration in high-grain diets on finishing steer performance and nutrient digestion. Journal of Animal Science 75: 2813–2823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montalvo, S., Daz, F., Guerrero, L., Sanchez, E. and Borj, R. 2005. Effect of particle size and doses of zeolite addition on anaerobic digestion processes of synthetic and piggery wastes. Process Biochemistry 40: 1475–1481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumpton, F. A. 1994. Mineralogy and geology of natural zeolite. Department of the Earth Science, New York.Google Scholar
Mumpton, F. A. and Fisherman, P. H. 1977. The application of natural zeolites in animal science and aquaculture. Journal of Animal Science 45: 1188–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. 1996. Nutrient requirement of beef cattle, sixth edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Olson, K. C., Cochran, R. C., Jones, T. J., Vanzant, E. S., Titgemeyer, E. C. and Johnson, D. E. 1999. Effects of ruminal administration of supplemental degradable intake protein and starch on utilization of low-quality warm-season grass hay by beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 77: 1016–1025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, S. 1980. Observation from the literature concerning the use of natural zeolite, clinoptilolite, as an additive to animal feed. Leonard Resources Inc., Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
Pond, W. G. 1984. Protection against acute ammonia toxicity by clinoptilolite in mature sheep. Nutrient reports international 30: 99–110.Google Scholar
Rahmani, A. R., Mahvi, A. H., Mesdaghinia, A. R. and Nasseri, S. 2004. Investigation of ammonia removal from polluted waters by Clinoptilolite zeolite. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 1: 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. F. 1998. Effect of undegradable intake protein on amino acid absorption and utilization by the growing steer. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, L. A., Stallings, C. C., Herbein, J. H. and McGilliard, M. L. 1997. Diurnal variation in milk and plasma urea nitrogen in Holstein and Jersey cows in response to degradable dietary protein and added fat. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 3368–3376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shain, D. H., Stock, R. A., Klopfenstein, T. J. and Huffman, R. P. 1994. Level of ruminal degradable nitrogen in finishing beef cattle diets. Journal of Animal Science 74: 239 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Spears, J. W. 1996. Beef nutrition in the 21st century. Animal Feed Science and Technology 58: 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1996. SAS/STAT software: changes and enhancement through release 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach, second edition. McGraw Hill, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Stephenson, R. G. A. and Huff, J. L. 1992. Effect of molasses, sodium bentonite and zeolite on urea toxicity. Australian Journal of agriculture Research 43: 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweeney, T. F., Bull, L. S. and Hemken, R. W. 1980. Effects of zeolite as a feed additive on growth performance in ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 51: (suppl. 1)401.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. E., Mason, C. R. and Schmidt, S. P. 1984. Relation of feedlot performance and certain physiological responses to the metabolizable protein and urea content of cattle diets. Journal of Animal Science 58: 1285–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Keulen, J. and Young, B. A. 1977. Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. Journal of Animal Science 44: 282–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant, second edition. Cornell University Press, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, P. J. and Lewis, B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J. L. and Ohlrogge, A. J. 1974. Ion exchange materials to increase consumption of non protein nitrogen in ruminants. Canadian patent 939186, 2 January 1974.Google Scholar
Williams, T. O. and Miller, F. C. 1992. Odor control using biofilters. Biocycle 33: 72–77.Google Scholar
Zinn, R. A. 1995. Protein level, source, and non-protein nitrogen for feedlot cattle. Proceedings of Plains Nutrition, Council Symposium, Amarillo, TX, vol. 1, pp. 16–37.Google Scholar