Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:52:16.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of feeding whole and rolled barley to steers in the morning or afternoon in diets containing differing proportions of hay and grain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. W. Mathison ,
D. F. Engstrom  and
D. D. Macleod
G. W. Mathison
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2P5
D. F. Engstrom
Affiliation:
Animal Industry Division, Alberta Agriculture, O.S. Longman Building, 6909 116 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 4P2
D. D. Macleod
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2P5
Get access

Abstract

A 2 × 2 × 2 factorial experiment was conducted with 128 growing-finishing steer calves to examine the effects of feeding whole v. rolled barley in diets containing either a constant proportion of concentrate (0·67) or proportionately 0·33 concentrate for 56 days followed by 0·90 concentrate for 83 days, with the concentrate being given at either 08.00 or 15.30 h. Steers given hay at 08.00 h and concentrate at 15.50 h grew proportionately 0·05 faster (P < 0-05) and had better dry matter (DM): gain ratios (P < 0·05) during the first 56 days than those given concentrate at 08.00 h and hay at 09.00 h. By the end of the trial steers fed at 15.50 h had similar daily gains to steers fed at 08.00 h but required proportionately 0·02 less DM: gain (P <0·05). No significant difference in gain was detected between steers given whole (1·30 kg/day) or rolled (1·38 kg/day) barley, but those given whole barley ate proportionately 0-08 more DM daily and had a proportionately 0-15 poorer DM: gain ratio (P < 0-05). The digestibility of diets containing whole grain was reduced (P < 0-05). Thirty-six steers given whole barley bloated compared with nine given rolled barley (P < 0·05). No significant differences were found either in DM intake or in final proportion of concentrate in the diet between steers given the diet containing proportionately 0·67 concentrate throughout the feeding period and those given the variable concentrate diets. There was a trend for DM: gain ratios to be poorer for steers given the constant proportion of concentrate (6·89 v. 6·65).

Keywords

barleyliveweight gainsmeal patternsprocessingsteers
Type
Papers
Information
Animal Production , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , December 1991 , pp. 321 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. Official methods of analysis. 14th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC. and Wainman, F. W. 1956. Frequency of feeding and energy utilization by sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 15: ii–iii.Google Scholar
Bragg, D. St A., Murphy, M. R. and Davis, C. L. 1986. Effect of source of carbohydrate and frequency of feeding on rumen parameters in dairy steers. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 392–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, A. W. A. and Dunton, C. R. 1967. Effect of frequency of feeding upon food utilization by ruminants. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 26:181–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fahey, G. C. and Berger, L. L. 1988. Carbohydrate nutrition of ruminants. The ruminant animal digestive physiology and nutrition (ed. Church, D. C.), pp. 269–297. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Feedingstuffs Evaluation Unit. 1976. First report 1975. Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
French, N. and Kennelly, J. J. 1990. Effects of feeding frequency on ruminal parameters, plasma insulin, milk yield, and milk composition in Holstein cows, journal of Dairy Science 73:1857–1863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, M., France, J., Summers, M., McBride, B. and Milligan, L. P. 1989. Simulation of the energy costs associated with protein turnover and Na+, K+-transport in growing lambs, journal of Nutrition 119:1287–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieve, C. M. 1968. Rolled versus whole barley or oats in rations for fattening dairy calves. 47th annual feeders day report, Department of Animal Science, University of Alberta, pp. 35–26.Google Scholar
Howarth, R. E. 1975. A review of bloat in cattle. The Canadian Veterinary journal 16: 281–294.Google ScholarPubMed
Ikhatua, U. J., Ehoche, O. W. and Umoh, J. E. 1987. The influence of feeding frequency on feed intake, nutrient utilization and nitrogen metabolism in growing zebu cattle. journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108: 639–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joanning, S. W., Johnson, D. E. and Barry, B. P. 1981. Nutrient digestibility depressions in corn silage-corn grain mixtures fed to steers, journal of Animal Science 53: 1095–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, C. A. and Hamilton, D. 1980. The effect of proportion of whole or rolled oats in steer rations on their digestibility. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 20: 268–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macleod, D. D. 1990. Relationships between chewing activity and voluntary intake, passage rate constants and digestibility in steers. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Animal Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.Google Scholar
Macleod, G. K., Grieve, D. G. and Lewis, N. J. 1989. Effect of feeding strategies on performance of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 72: suppl. 1, pp. 509-510 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Mathison, G. W., Engstrom, D. F., Kennelly, J. J., Roth, L. and Beck, B. E. 1989. Efficacy of anhydrous ammonia and sulfur dioxide as preservatives for high-moisture grain and their effect on the nutritive value of barley for growing- finishing cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 69: 1007–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathison, G. W., Engstrom, D. F. and Weisenburger, R. D. 1989. Ruminant feed evaluation unit. 68th annual feeders' day report, Department of Animal Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, pp. 4–6.Google Scholar
Mathison, G. W., Hironaka, R., Kerrigan, B. K., Vlach, I., Milligan, L. P. and Weisenburger, R. D. 1991. Rate of starch degradation, apparent digestibility and rate and efficiency of steer gain as influenced by barley grain volume-weight and processing method. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 71: In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milligan, L. P. 1971. Energetic efficiency and metabolic transformations. Federations Proceedings 30:1454–1458.Google ScholarPubMed
Moir, R. J. and Somers, M. 1957. Ruminal flora studies. VIII. The influence of rate and method of feeding a ration upon its digestibility, upon ruminal function, and upon the ruminal populations. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 8: 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. A. and Campling, R. C. 1978. Digestibility of whole barley and oat grains by cattle of different ages. Animal Production 27: 323–329.Google Scholar
Morgan, E., Males, J. and Nelson, M. 1987. Use of rolled, whole barley examined for growing heifers. Cited in Feedstuffs 59: (36), 10.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J. W. G., Gorrill, A. D. L. and Burgess, P. L. 1971. Loss in digestible nutrients when ensiled barley is fed whole. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 51:697–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordin, M. and Campling, R. C. 1976. Digestibility studies with cows given whole and rolled cereal grains. Animal Production 23: 305–315.Google Scholar
Okine, E. K., Mathison, G. W. and Hardin, R. T. 1989. Relations between passage rates of rumen fluid and particulate matter and foam production in rumen contents of cattle fed on different diets ad libitum. British Journal of Nutrition 61: 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. 1979. Recent information on processing of grain for ruminants. Livestock Production Science 6: 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Soliman, H. S. and MacDearmid, A. 1978. Intake of hay by cattle given supplements of barley subjected to various forms of physical treatment or treatment with alkali. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90: 611–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, D. L., Smith, L. M. and Ronning, M. 1964. Effect of time of feeding concentrates and ground, pelleted alfalfa hay on milk fat percentage and fatty acid composition. Journal of Dairy Science 47:516–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, R. L. and Pfander, W. H. 1960. Performance changes in Iambs fed concentrate and roughage at varying times. Journal of Animal Science 19: 1287 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Rakes, A. H., Lister, E. E. and Reid, J. T. 1961. Some effects of feeding frequency on the utilization of isocaloric diets by young and adult sheep. Journal of Nutrition 75:86–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. H. 1989. Dynamic aspects of feeding management for dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 1197–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz, A. and Mowat, D. N. 1987. Effect of feeding frequency on the utilization of high-forage diets by cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 67:1067–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satter, L. D. and Baumgardt, B. R. 1962. Changes in digestive physiology of the bovine associated with various feeding frequencies. Journal of Animal Science 21: 897–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. D. G. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar
Sunderland, T. M., Gupta, B. N., Reid, R. S. and Murray, M. G. 1963. Effects of continuous feeding on digestion. Proceedings of the 6th international congress on nutrition, Edinburgh, p. 579 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Hart, I. C., Broster, W. H., Elliott, R. J. and Schuller, E. 1986. Feeding frequency for lactating cows: effects on rumen fermentation and blood metabolites and hormones. British Journal of Nutrition 56:181–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yaremcio, B. J., Mathison, G. W., Engstrom, D. F., Roth, L. A. and Caine, W. R. 1991. Effect of ammoniation on the preservation and feeding value of barley grain for growing- finishing cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 71: 439–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar