Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:13:47.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of dietary probiotic on the pH and colour characteristics of carcasses, breast fillets and drumsticks of broilers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

M. Karaoglu ,
M.I. Aksu ,
N. Esenbuga ,
M. Kaya ,
M. Macit  and
H. Durdag
M. Karaoglu*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science
M.I. Aksu
Affiliation:
Department of Food Engineering, College of Agriculture, Atatürk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey
N. Esenbuga
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science
M. Kaya
Affiliation:
Department of Food Engineering, College of Agriculture, Atatürk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey
M. Macit
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science
H. Durdag
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science
*
†E-mail:[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This research was carried out to determine the effects of commercial probiotic (115-Biogallinox) on the colour properties of carcasses and dissected products in broilers. Ross-308 male chicks were given probiotic (P0:0 g/kg, P1:1 g/kg and P2:2 g/kg) containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae for 49 days. At the end of the trial all birds were slaughtered, and pH and skin colour of the carcasses were determined at various times during the first 24 h (1, 3, 7, 12, 17 and 24 h). After dissection, breasts and drumsticks were divided into two groups for vacuum packaging and aerobic packaging. Packaged breasts and drumsticks were stored at 3 ± 0.5°C for 12 days. During the storage period, the colours of breast meat, drumstick meat and drumstick skin were determined.

pH values of carcasses decreased (P < 0.01) over the 24-h period post mortem. The pH values of the P1 group were lower than the P0 and P2 groups (P < 0.01). L*, a* and b* values increased during the 24-h period and the P0 group had lower a* values than the P1 and P2 groups (P < 0.05). The use of probiotic in the broiler diet had no effect on L*, a* and b* values of breast and drumstick muscle. The L* and a* values of breast muscles were lower than drumstick muscles (P < 0.05). The values of b* in aerobic packaged breasts and drumsticks were higher than when vacuum packaged (P < 0.01). L* and b* values were also affected by storage period. While the L* and b* values of drumstick skin were higher than of drumstick meat, a* values in drumstick meat were higher (P < 0.05). The packaging had no effect on drumstick colour values (drumstick meat and drumstick skin) and L* and b* values decreased during the storage period.

Keywords

broilersmeat characteristicspackagingprobioticsstorage
Type
Growth, development and meat science
Information
Animal Science , Volume 78 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 253 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abeni, F. and Bergoglio, G. 2001. Characterization of different strains of broiler chicken by carcass measurements, chemical and physical parameters and NIRS on breast muscle. Meat Science 57: 133–137.Google Scholar
Aksu, M. I., Karaoglu, M., Esenbuga, N., Kaya, M., Öztürk Er, H., Macit, M. and Ockerman, H. W. 2004. Effect of dietary probiotic conditions on the quality characteristics of raw broiler drumsticks and breast fillets. Journal of Muscle Foods In press.Google Scholar
Allen, C. D., Russell, S. M. and Fletcher, D. L. 1997. The relationship of broiler breast meat colour and pH to shelf-line and odor development. Poultry Science 76: 1042–1046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altan, A., Bayraktar, H. and Önenç, A. 2001. The effects of heat stress on colour and pH of broiler meat. Journal of Animal Production of the Turkish Animal Science Association 42: 1–8.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemist, 14th edition. The William Byrd. Press, Inc., Richmond, VA.Google Scholar
Banday, M. T. and Risam, K. S. 2001. Growth performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chicken fed with probiotics. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 36: 252–255.Google Scholar
Castellini, C., Mugnai, C. and Dal Basco, A. 2002. Effect of organic production system on broiler carcass and meat quality. Meat Science 60: 219–225.Google Scholar
Du, M., Nam, K. C., Hur, S. J., Ismail, H. and Ahn, D. U. 2002. Effect of dietary conjugated linoleic acid, irradiation, and packaging conditions on the quality characteristics of raw broiler breast fillets. Meat Science 60: 9–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erdogan, Z. 1999. The use of antibiotics and probiotics in broiler diets. Lalahan Hayvancilik Arastirma Enstitüsü Dergisi 39: 57–69.Google Scholar
Fletcher, D. L. 1989. Factors influencing pigmentation in poultry. Critical Reviews in Poultry Biology 2: 149–170.Google Scholar
Fletcher, D. L. 1995. Relationship of breast meat color variation to muscle pH and texture. Poultry Science 74: (suppl. 1) 120.Google Scholar
Fletcher, D. L. 1999a. Poultry meat color. In Poultry meat science (ed. Richardson, R. I. and Mead, G. G.), pp. 159–175. CABI Publishing, USA.Google Scholar
Fletcher, D. L. 1999b. Color variation in commercially packaged broiler breast fillets. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 8: 67–69.Google Scholar
Fletcher, D. L., Qiao, M. and Smith, D. P. 2000. The relationship of raw broiler breast meat colour and pH to cooked meat colour and pH. Poultry Science 79: 784–788.Google Scholar
Froning, G. W. 1995. Color of poultry meat. Poultry and Avian Biology Reviews 6: 83–93.Google Scholar
Karaoglu, M., Aksu, M. I., Esenbuga, N., Kaya, M., Macit, M. and Kurbanoglu, E. B. 2004. Effect of dietary ram horn hydrolysate (RHH) on the pH and color characteristics of carcasses, breast fillets and drumsticks of broilers. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture In press.Google Scholar
Karaoglu, M. and Durdag, H. 2003. Dietary probiotic effect on growth, slaughtering and carcass traits in broiler chickens slaughtered at different ages. Research project final report, College of Agriculture, Atatürk University, Turkey.Google Scholar
Kumprechtová, D., Zobag, P. and Kumprecht, I. 2000. The effect of Saccharomyces cerevisia Sc47 on chicken broiler performance and nitrogen output. Czech Journal of Animal Science 45: 169–177.Google Scholar
Kutlu, H. R. and Görgülü, M. 2001. [Feed additive alternatives to antibiotic-growing factors, used in poultry diets.] Yem Magazin Dergisi 27: 45–51.Google Scholar
Midilli, M. and Tuncer, S. D. 2001. The effects of enzyme and probiotic supplementation to diets on broiler performance. Turkish Journal of Veterinary Animal Science 25: 895–903.Google Scholar
Millar, S. J., Moss, B. W. and Stevenson, M. H. 2000. The effect of ionising radiation on the colour of leg and breast of poultry meat. Meat Science 55: 361–370.Google Scholar
Nanke, K. E., Sebranek, J. G. and Olson, D. G. 1999. Color characteristics of irradiated aerobically packaged pork, beef, and turkey. Journal of Food Science 64: 272–278.Google Scholar
Petracci, M. and Fletcher, D. L. 2002. Broiler skin and meat color changes during storage. Poultry Science 81: 1589–1597.Google Scholar
Pingel, H., Wicke, M. and Lengerken, G. V. 1998. Gewinnung und Qualität von Geflügelfleisch. Qualität von Fleisch und Fleischwaren Band 1. Deutscher Fachverlag, Germany.Google Scholar
Qiao, M., Fletcher, D. L., Northcutt, J. K. and Smith, D. P. 2002a. The relationship between raw broiler breast meat color and composition. Poultry Science 81: 422–427.Google Scholar
Qiao, M., Fletcher, D. L., Smith, D. P. and Northcutt, J. K. 2002b. Effect of raw broiler breast meat color variation on marination and cooked meat quality. Poultry Science 81: 276–380.Google Scholar
Richter, G., Künh, I. and Köhler, H. 1999. [Test of toyocerin in broiler fattening.] In Vitamine und Zusatzstoffe in der Ernahrung von Mensch und Tier: 7. Symposium Jena/Thüringen, 22 and 23 September, Germany.Google Scholar
Satbir, S. and Sharma, V. P. 1999. Performance of broiler chicks under different energy and probiotic levels during summer season. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 34: 34–37.Google Scholar
Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences. 1996. SPSS for Windows release 10.01. SPSS Inc., Chicago.Google Scholar
Yalçin, S., Özkan, S., Açikgöz, Z. and Közkan, K. 1999. Effect of dietary methionine on performance, carcass characteristics and breast meat composition of heterozygous naked neck (Na/Na +) birds under spring and summer conditions. British Poultry Science 40: 688–694.Google Scholar